Jump to content
SAU Community

Will I Need A Retune After Cahanging My Catalytic Converter ?


Recommended Posts

Just bought a Venom 500 series hi flow cat with a 100 CPSI flow for 3 inch exhaust system. I am running a Microtech Lt x12s ecu , will i need a retune once i fit the new catalytic converter ? At the moment it has a ceramic cat fitted to the exhaust system , which has had a few bumps & bruises !!! So i thought i would replace it with a stainless steal one , which will last longer & have better flow. Will the extra flow cause the fuel / air ratios to change ? :thanks:

no

flow speed wont be noticable

But if i'm going from 400 CPSI cat to a 100 CPSI cat flow sould be alot better ! If not what would be the point in changing cats then ?

Edited by Tweaky
  • Haha 1

The point of changing the cat is to relieve backpressure, with a freeflowing cat the exhaust velocity is maintained (where it might have been slowed down when caught in the 400cpsi) which helps helps turbo response.

The point of changing the cat is to relieve backpressure, with a freeflowing cat the exhaust velocity is maintained (where it might have been slowed down when caught in the 400cpsi) which helps helps turbo response.

So once the new Hi flow cat is fitted & there is better flow , will that be enough to upset any current tune settings on the ecu ? Will the car have to go back to my tuner for any slight adjustments ? :thanks:

  • Haha 1

But if i'm going from 400 CPSI cat to a 100 CPSI cat flow sould be alot better ! If not what would be the point in changing cats then ?

are you expecting amazing things from changing cats? unless your running high numbers it doesn't really change much

ive tried more cats than an 80 year old chinese cook

Edited by Clutch
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

if anything

you would come on boost earlier, causing a lean of fuel in certain rev ranges.

but this would only happen if your tune was shit to begin with ie running TOOOO lean..

shouldnt be a problem, unless your fussed about 1 or 2 kw's..

O.k thanks guys , just wanted to make sure ! Better to be safe then sorry :nyaanyaa: Car is making the 290rwkw mark at the moment , the guy who sold me the cat recommend i get a tune after it is fitted. Thats why i'm double checking :thumbsup: The last tune was done 3 months ago & car is running great , anything i think the car would be running on the rich side.

Edited by Tweaky
  • 14 years later...

Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate)

Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?

20 minutes ago, silviaz said:

Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate)

Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily.

30 minutes ago, silviaz said:

Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?

Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily.

Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.

Ah, to clarify if the car has already been tuned and has been modified and you want to go from a oem cat to a 100 cell or decat or vice versa.Are you saying that the car doesn't need to be tuned after a cat change if it's already been tuned?

Edited by silviaz
7 minutes ago, silviaz said:

Ah, to clarify if the car has already been tuned and has been modified and you want to go from a oem cat to a 100 cell or decat or vice versa.Are you saying that the car doesn't need to be tuned after a cat change if it's already been tuned?

Maybe?

If changing the cat to a higher flowing cat, caused the turbo to spool more quickly, and those areas of the map had not been tuned for the boost level it is now seeing, then yes you would need a re-tune. How dangerous it is running without the updated tune would depend on how far out the tune is with the now higher boost levels, how the engine protection has been setup, is the ECU compensating with a wideband sensor, is the boost control closed loop blah blah million other things...

But yeah having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if changing out the cat for a high flow, in say a full 3" exhaust, made no noticeable difference at all. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...