Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

$1250 for a bush bearing highflow is more like it - thats the mark

i bought my original journal bearing highflow - the Sliding Performance rb highflow - for $600 :)

no way Id pay triple that amount for a vq bush bearing highflow

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting. Their website says that benefits are:

360 degrees Thrust bearing Inconel steel wheel and shaft Suitable for High Boost applications

Is the "Inconel" brand good?

a bit of light reading here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/

Edited by ironpaw

nah not yet...PM'ed him and awaiting response. Might call him tomorrow...

Can you give me the sizing and all other details I need when getting a quote? I think I'll just get the same size as yours...

Craig and Aaron got a 3071 equiv?

craig got a 3071 mushed into standard housings..

mines a stage 2 sierra combo which is the same size as craigs, except in Journal. my experience hasnt been great with BB. also dont go where i went.

hi guys i think i mentioned earlier

im looking at R.I.P.S to do a custom manifold and custome pipework around the engine so it flows better and is easier to work on , what size turbo do you reckomend for the stagea on stock internals ( that will get a upgrade soon enough )

looking at garret b turbos

hi guys i think i mentioned earlier

im looking at R.I.P.S to do a custom manifold and custome pipework around the engine so it flows better and is easier to work on , what size turbo do you reckomend for the stagea on stock internals ( that will get a upgrade soon enough )

looking at garret b turbos

I'll be interested to see these manifolds when they're done :thumbsup:

when you say core is that just a set that can be used to rebuild the standard turbo

or is that a full turbo replacment ?

if your doing the full manifold rebuil, you should be able to get the complete core and housings in there might take a while, but possible.

if your doing the full manifold rebuil, you should be able to get the complete core and housings in there might take a while, but possible.

well ill post pics up once i start my build , still planning stage as thats were you want to get things right

IMO.....if you change the turbo and manifolds you better off putting the turbo where the current airbox....that way you can get rid of any sharp turn's in the plumbing.

.....an even better idea would be to keep the current passenger side turbo with a new manifold and develop a drivers side bank manifold with turbo. That way you will be able to still use a turbo that fit's into the area and get a decent waist gate on......this might also involve a new custom plenum and FMIC though

P.S. Yes twins Scott!3some.gif

ASked Stao about a bush bearing hi flow with 360 washers...$960

Asked him about getting a 3071 core and this is what he said:

Well, there is no point going for 3071 CHRA in your high flow as the rear housing of it is already small and our customized will produce more power then the 3071 profile. There will be no difference in response based on factory housings, plus bush bearing is a more relaible setup then the ball bearing setup. The 3071 high flow cost $1550 AUD, you need to change all water, and oil lines to suit that CHRA.

The factory housing is not big enough to flow 350rwkws. The max we can that that to is 300rwkws on a manual, Auto will be about 25KW behind plus it won't handle any thing relaiably above 230rwkws. I would recommend you to use our standard high flow option with a high pressure actuator to achieve that goal.

Regards

Stao

hmmm stick with bush bearing i guess?

Even the HKS kit uses the stock manifolds, and they obviously flow well enough to kill a built gearbox so unless you are putting a manual behind it soon, it would be a complete waste of time.

A gt3071 core stuffed into the factory housings is good for 250-270 with the right mods, (intake and exhaust)and wont be too laggy, you will need to spend 3-4k on the auto to handle that sort of power, and it still doesnt hold much more than 300 I have found.

IMO.....if you change the turbo and manifolds you better off putting the turbo where the current airbox....that way you can get rid of any sharp turn's in the plumbing.

.....an even better idea would be to keep the current passenger side turbo with a new manifold and develop a drivers side bank manifold with turbo. That way you will be able to still use a turbo that fit's into the area and get a decent waist gate on......this might also involve a new custom plenum and FMIC though

P.S. Yes twins Scott!3some.gif

Why don't you just go out at get a set of manifolds from and APS G35 TT kit?

Even the HKS kit uses the stock manifolds, and they obviously flow well enough to kill a built gearbox so unless you are putting a manual behind it soon, it would be a complete waste of time.

A gt3071 core stuffed into the factory housings is good for 250-270 with the right mods, (intake and exhaust)and wont be too laggy, you will need to spend 3-4k on the auto to handle that sort of power, and it still doesnt hold much more than 300 I have found.

what are you running scotty ? and how does it perform any cons?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...