Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Well Ive got most of my parts for my work ready and it should see anything from 280 - 310rwkw on regular fuel pump. The next thing to consider is my brakes but wow the price figures on a set of big brakes is amazing.

I'm going to be cheap here and ask for help and opinions.

First off. What is the biggest, safest size I can get for 17" wheels? Do aftermarket brakes bulge out more than the Nissan brakes on the R33 GTST? They look alot slimmer in pictures.

Secondly, and a big secondly. It looks like alot of money can be saved if I ditch the rear brakes. I can understand this would have a huge impact on a AWD car but all rear wheel cars, including skylines, have little tiny brakes at the back and bigger up front. If I upgrade just the front brakes, would I still get even braking? I don't want my ass to shoot left and right.

Secondly, has anyone heard of the following brands D2 or KSport?

D2 have an 8 piston front caliper, rotor, lines, pads, bolts and adapter set for an R33 for $1650 shipped. KSport have a 6 piston front set for $1500~

I don't really like the idea of running 10 - 15 year old GTR brakes when something brand new can be had for roughly the same price(seriously those old GTR brakes are too overpriced).

Any input would be great.

If anyone can recommend anything else, I ask for your suggestion!

Cheers.

Edited by SargeRX8
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/356186-changing-only-front-calipersrotors/
Share on other sites

yes obviously 8pot brakes will be bigger than factory brakes, Keep in mind the rotors are big on those big brake kits that why they prob look slimmer in pics.

It depneds on the disk type and offset of your 17's. I would assume you would be fine upgrading the front brakes and leaving the rear standard and not having too much ill affect.

Yes everyone heard of d2 and ksport do i quick google search for reviews.

GTR brakes are proven quality and priced accordingly. Mind you like anything second hand with imports some ppl want drug money for their parts.

Edited by Omg_its_trent

whats the intended usage of the car? Power is sort of irrelevant as a track car would have more of a need for better brakes than a street car sitting on 60 all day.

Keep in mind nissan did a good job with the brakes, look at brembo factory calipers maybe as a good upgrade before spending big $ on the biggest and best only to be let down by worn bushes, and poor rubber on the tyres.

First off. What is the biggest, safest size I can get for 17" wheels? Do aftermarket brakes bulge out more than the Nissan brakes on the R33 GTST? They look alot slimmer in pictures.

Around the 330mm mark seems to be a safe bet with 17" wheels. Really depends on the wheel design whether it will clear the brakes as the caliper is now being moved closer to the edge which is where certain wheels will start to "curve in" so to speak.

Secondly, and a big secondly. It looks like alot of money can be saved if I ditch the rear brakes. I can understand this would have a huge impact on a AWD car but all rear wheel cars, including skylines, have little tiny brakes at the back and bigger up front. If I upgrade just the front brakes, would I still get even braking? I don't want my ass to shoot left and right.

This all comes down to brake bias. The front usually has a lot more bias since it does most of the work hence why rear brake calipers are a lot smaller. Obviously there is a lot more to this but I won't cover it here. Research how brakes actually function on the net to get a good understanding of it all.

So as long as you don't upset this brake bias to much you can easily upgrade just the fronts and have the factory rears work in harmony. If you do change the brake bias this can also be ok if you know what you are doing and set it up accordingly.

Secondly, has anyone heard of the following brands D2 or KSport?

D2 have an 8 piston front caliper, rotor, lines, pads, bolts and adapter set for an R33 for $1650 shipped. KSport have a 6 piston front set for $1500~

These brands are all the same. They are manufactured in China and can go under a lot of different names. Basically I could put 100 kits into manufacturing and call them G SPOT and bring them out.

There have been a lot of positive things said about these kits and are probably the most affordable aftermarket options. I looked into these myself but at the end of the day just didn't feel all that comfortable with them.

I don't really like the idea of running 10 - 15 year old GTR brakes when something brand new can be had for roughly the same price(seriously those old GTR brakes are too overpriced).

I know exactly how you feel. The GTR Brembos are great brakes. Perfect bolt on, 100% legal with no mod plates etc needed. However the money people ask for them given their age is a joke. If they were realistic money this would have been my upgrade. Sometimes you can get a bargain, but I was never lucky enough.

If anyone can recommend anything else, I ask for your suggestion!

Well basically after everything was looked into I chose to go with the Wilwood kits that I put together for our group buy. They were everything I wanted in a brake package and were a decent price. For $1850 delivered I really don't think there was anything that could match them :)

My 2 cents.

I'm running the ksport 8pot 330's on the front with stocker 33 gtst brakes on the rear.

blue stuff up front with yellow stuff on the rear. One track day down, no problems.

fitment with 17" depends on the rim. RPF1 will not fit. super advan, te37, gramlight will.

For performance, Personally Id just upgrade to some decent discs like dba 4000 and a quality set of pads like the QFMs , a set of braided hoses and maybe motul 6100 fluid ,I reckon you'd find the setup more than adequate for most applications and cost well under a grand all up..

That said, big brakes do look cool, But Im a cheap ass :P

Hahaha slacker :P

Nah still waiting on the Wilwoods. Maybe another 2 or so weeks.

I'm looking forward to getting some money to put semi slicks on the car to really get the benefit of the bigger brakes.

For performance, Personally Id just upgrade to some decent discs like dba 4000 and a quality set of pads like the QFMs , a set of braided hoses and maybe motul 6100 fluid ,I reckon you'd find the setup more than adequate for most applications and cost well under a grand all up..

That said, big brakes do look cool, But Im a cheap ass :P

4000's will crack on the track. I've gone through a set as have many others (Calder, PI and Sandown)

rda, dba5000's, pmu single's in 324mm with UAS spacers is the other thing you can go. I did, but you chew through pad's.

On my 32 I run 33gtst calipers on dogbones to fit 324mm (33gtr) DBA4000 rotors, DS2500 pads, braided lines and a master cyl stopper.

Way more braking than street tyres can handle (haven't run full slicks so can't comment on that).

They BARELY fit under 34GTT rims, there was like 1mm of clearance from outside of caliper to inside of wheel.

I'm keen to try out a big brake kit on my car.

I'm actually running the setup couple of guys have mentioned being the dba4000s, pads (i'm using project mu pads atm), steel lines and high temp fluid but i still find the braking lacking. Tires are KU36s which as some may know, gives insane grip in the dry for an S compound. Hope this feedback helps.

For the street GTT or GTR brakes with Motul (or other quality) fluid and decent pads will be more than adequate. Just bought a set of D2 fronts for the track and although they have a good rep for stopping they are not going to do my unsprung weight any favours!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...