Jump to content
SAU Community

Any Car Faster Than Gtr Good For Airport Run?


Recommended Posts

...Gnomes have a chance of fitting in the back of R35s...

Link me to info you have saying "3.046"

You can easily fit 2 adults in the backseat of an R35. 2 adults can even have sex in the backseat of an R35. It's difficult but can be done.

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You can easily fit 2 adults in the backseat of an R35. 2 adults can even have sex in the backseat of an R35. It's difficult but can be done.

Really? I haven't tried but it's pretty cramped back there. You've achieved this successfully? Surely if you can afford a R35 you can afford a hotel room.

But really, i'm not a big fan of the back seats. Does anyone know if I ripped out the backseats and put in a roll cage, would it be able to double as storage space or luggage rack?

Really? I haven't tried but it's pretty cramped back there. You've achieved this successfully? Surely if you can afford a R35 you can afford a hotel room.

But really, i'm not a big fan of the back seats. Does anyone know if I ripped out the backseats and put in a roll cage, would it be able to double as storage space or luggage rack?

Achieved, yes. Successful maybe. There are many degrees of successful.

Back seats in the R35 are really only good for ferrying kids around, which i do with my lot quite often. But anyway whats even more spectacular are lap times. 0-100km/hr gets boring fast. Hell i am sure we could build a 600hp falcadore with a 4500 stall that will drag off a godzilla, for less than 1/4 the price. Where to mate?

Relax with the R35 better than the rest crap, go out and drive some cars is all I can say. I have a 2010 R35 and I lurk here every now and then.

It is a great car for the money, there are still better cars out there but you pay more for them and it depends in what you want from a car. If you want looks then don't get an R35, if you want reliability don't get an R35 ( I keep having issues and finally Nissan is ordering a transmission for me, my navigation/multimedia unit sometimes works, sometimes doesn't). If you like to pose to euros about your 0-100 times and 60ft launch times then get an R35, but then they get back by saying "what about your 60-160 times? " If you can afford something better, then get it, if you can't then you are stuck with these, although they are not bad, they are not great either and only kids and hoons seem to appreciate them unless you are at an owners meet. I have never had a random breath test in anything other than the R35 which I have been singled out 3 times since owning it (no fines).

0-100 times are not what car guys care about, ofcorse an R35 is going to have a good 0-100 time, it is awd and geared for it, japs are facinated about 0-100 times and 60 ft launch times. And yes it has an awesome 0-100 time for the money you spend.

I am glad I have owned an R35, but when I sell it I won't miss it. It doesn't excite me like other cars and bikes do. An MX5 excites me more.

I am currently looking for a new car to replace the R35, Series 3 sounds good, but do I want to do it again? Probably not.

In regards to being the fastest. Wakefield and Winton lap times say it all.

Wakefield:

Porsche 911 turbo = 1:05

Porsche 911 GT2 = 1.05.05

Porsche 911 Gt3 = 1.05.10

Series 2 R35 GTR = 1.05.80

Winton

Porsche 911 GT2 = 1.32.10

Lambo Gallardo = 1.32.80

Series 2 R35 = 1.33.70

Series 1 R35 = 1.36.30

https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=tADXtWYMAmoUeQu0VP6yGKQ#gid=1

Found it from the Wheels Magazine, short tracks so a 1 second difference is quite large really.

Back seats in the R35 are really only good for ferrying kids around, which i do with my lot quite often. But anyway whats even more spectacular are lap times. 0-100km/hr gets boring fast. Hell i am sure we could build a 600hp falcadore with a 4500 stall that will drag off a godzilla, for less than 1/4 the price. Where to mate?

Back seats are for extra luggage and the dog :rofl2:

the 3 dead is impressive in videos, but in reality cars are much slower than US and Japan tests on Aussie soil

the back seats in the R35 are also good for comparing the different grades of vinyl used bw the rear seats, front seats and dashboard :whistling:

but i still love it, best car ive owned so far, i can drive to and from work in comfort and zero fuss, park it without fear of getting keyed, tinker with the mods, head out to the country in the dead of the night for a blast, then give it a detail on sunday ready for another week

and only kids and hoons seem to appreciate them unless you are at an owners meet.

my experience has been the opposite. Most older car enthusiasts i know with ferraris, lambos, high end porsches etc actually appreciate the mechanical package and value for money in conversation

Edited by domino_z

Back seats in the R35 are really only good for ferrying kids around, which i do with my lot quite often. But anyway whats even more spectacular are lap times. 0-100km/hr gets boring fast. Hell i am sure we could build a 600hp falcadore with a 4500 stall that will drag off a godzilla, for less than 1/4 the price. Where to mate?

Good post !

And quarter of the price, mate build you two for that :P

That 3.0 flat 0 - 100 seems ludicrously fast i would look to the launch control and electronics etc for such fast times as the GT-R is simply too underpowered and too heavy to do that in a classical sense (not that they don't go like stink ! just saying physics is against us!)

Good post !

And quarter of the price, mate build you two for that :P

That 3.0 flat 0 - 100 seems ludicrously fast i would look to the launch control and electronics etc for such fast times as the GT-R is simply too underpowered and too heavy to do that in a classical sense (not that they don't go like stink ! just saying physics is against us!)

Relax with the R35 better than the rest crap, go out and drive some cars is all I can say.

In regards to being the fastest. Wakefield and Winton lap times say it all.

Wakefield:

Porsche 911 turbo = 1:05

Porsche 911 GT2 = 1.05.05

Porsche 911 Gt3 = 1.05.10

Series 2 R35 GTR = 1.05.80

Winton

Porsche 911 GT2 = 1.32.10

Lambo Gallardo = 1.32.80

Series 2 R35 = 1.33.70

Series 1 R35 = 1.36.30

https://spreadsheets...u0VP6yGKQ#gid=1

Found it from the Wheels Magazine, short tracks so a 1 second difference is quite large really.

First of all, this thread is not about GTR being better than the rest. Simply asking is there a faster car for an airport run.

Second, why does Winton and Wakefield say it all? Does Nurburgring and Top Gear test track mean nothing?

Porsche GT2's are death traps that cost 3 times as much. Rear engine? Grow a brain. I don't feel so bad about having a car that's a fraction of a second slower in the dry and will absolutely kill it in the wet.

I've owned my series I for almost 2 years, no problems at all. And you have got to be seriously delusional if you think anyone can build more reliable cars than the Japs.

As far as if someone can afford better, then get it. I had a McLaren MP-4 12C on order for the end of the year. Cancelled it once I saw the series III. I just don't think it's better. I'll just keep laughing at people who pay through the nose for a brand name and nothing more. They are like school girls staring wide eyed at Louis Vuitton or Chanel. This is a car, not a fashion accessory. Performance should be enough for bragging rights. I'm not stuck in a GTR, I choose it.

I'll buy a more expensive car when the performance justifies it. Not before. Until then, the GTR gives me the performance of a supercar, convenience of a regular coupe and a chance to bank all the money I saved by not buying Ferraris and McLarens to invest in something that will appreciate in value. So when a truly worth hyper expensive car comes along, I'll be able to pay for it more easily.

Edited by R35III

my chaser can do an airport run quicker then your gtr, fit an extra passanger and carry 2 suitcases and will get more looks then a GTR because of my super cool camry badge

:ph34r:

Amazing sounds coming from the Z06 and Mustang, R35 needed an open exhaust :wub:

Did not expect the Z06 and GTR to be that close around the circuit - the carbon brake package must really help it along. I was confused at the end with what the presenter said - did he say at the "checkout" the GTR is cheaper than the Z06, meaning fuel? Cause at the start of the video they mentioned the list price was ~70k for the Corvette and ~90k for the GTR?

my chaser can do an airport run quicker then your gtr, fit an extra passanger and carry 2 suitcases and will get more looks then a GTR because of my super cool camry badge

:ph34r:

Is this a joke? I'm not sure :unsure:

Is this a joke? I'm not sure :unsure:

ummm cant you tell its a serious post from my ninja emotican and my super cool camry badge post???

marlin the grown ups left as soon as they saw a thread title "Any Car Faster Than Gtr Good For Airport Run"

First of all, this thread is not about GTR being better than the rest. Simply asking is there a faster car for an airport run.

Second, why does Winton and Wakefield say it all? Does Nurburgring and Top Gear test track mean nothing?

Porsche GT2's are death traps that cost 3 times as much. Rear engine? Grow a brain. I don't feel so bad about having a car that's a fraction of a second slower in the dry and will absolutely kill it in the wet.

I've owned my series I for almost 2 years, no problems at all. And you have got to be seriously delusional if you think anyone can build more reliable cars than the Japs.

As far as if someone can afford better, then get it. I had a McLaren MP-4 12C on order for the end of the year. Cancelled it once I saw the series III. I just don't think it's better. I'll just keep laughing at people who pay through the nose for a brand name and nothing more. They are like school girls staring wide eyed at Louis Vuitton or Chanel. This is a car, not a fashion accessory. Performance should be enough for bragging rights. I'm not stuck in a GTR, I choose it.

I'll buy a more expensive car when the performance justifies it. Not before. Until then, the GTR gives me the performance of a supercar, convenience of a regular coupe and a chance to bank all the money I saved by not buying Ferraris and McLarens to invest in something that will appreciate in value. So when a truly worth hyper expensive car comes along, I'll be able to pay for it more easily.

You seem awfully reassured buddy.. why bother even posting a thread?

You seem awfully reassured buddy.. why bother even posting a thread?

Dude, I'm asking if I missed some cars in my thinking. I started this thread to ask if there's a car that's faster and can let you pick up a friend with luggage from the airport.

I'm not looking for vindication of my choice in motor vehicle. Quite comfortable with my choice and my car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I always wondered how you were supposed to buy a set of 24 buckets and somehow magically have every single one of them yield exactly the desired clearance. I would have thought you'd need to assemble a cam with either 12 "sample" or "example" buckets of known top thickness (or a single such sample/example 12 times over!!) measure clearances at every valve, and then do the usual math to work out what the actual "shimness" of each bucket needed to be, before buying the required buckets to make up he thicknesses that you didn't have on hand.
    • I now seem to be limited in power due to my rev limit/hydraulic lifters in my built RB25. I'm looking into converting over to Tomei solid lifters. Question for anyone that has done the conversion. I was always under the impression that when using the Tomei solid lifter conversion, you would also require new valves (Longer or shorter stems, I can't remember which).  I don't know where I got this idea, as so far I see no mention of this in any of the Tomei documentation. It just states I need the Tomei solid buckets, solid lifter cams and upgraded springs. As my head is already built, all I would need is another set of 1000$ Kelford cams, 500$ buckets and about 4H hours of my time installing and I'm off to the races!?!? There's no way it's that simple, I must be missing something? 
    • I couldn't agree more. I should have started from the get-go with a NEO or solid bucket conversion. I started looking into converting over to solid lifters yesterday. Now for some reason I was always under the impression that when using the Tomei solid lifter conversion, you would also require new valves (Longer or shorter stems, I can't remember which).  But I see no mention of this on any of the Tomei documentation. It just states that I need the Tomei solid buckets, solid lifter cams and upgraded springs. As my head is already built, all I would need is another set of 1000$ Kelford cams, 500$ buckets and about 4H hours of my time installing and I'm off to the races!?!? There's no way it's that simple, I must be missing something? 
    • BRUH, one of the biggest mistakes of my life..... and i've had plenty ;[)
    • @Murray_Calavera iam just considering options 🙂 of course it is very expensive so that why i ask here 🙂  @joshuaho96 I looked at that GCG hybrid(i remember looking at it few weeks before) So this is "that" hybrid where i send them my turbo and they upgrade the inside to Garrett stuff and then they send it back. It cost around 1200-1300 USD which is FAR cheaper than the HKS and it is what iam looking for(i just do not have experience like this...to send something off to "upgrade" ) @tylink720 that is like 150 USD turbo no? 😄 I dont think i have the "ease on my mind" with this kind of turbo. I just put over 7000k USD to "LINK" up my engine...dont want to blow it up with cheap turbo 😄     EDIT: https://www.cj-motor.com/gcg-turbo-charger-for-nissan-rb20det-rb25det-high?srsltid=AfmBOooVeOZ6CZ6r1AIv5m-KPaa6BvudIPJTY8LW78khkd-gQlsaCht9 I looked at this and it seems ok? It is that CGC hybrid and it costs around 1250 USD (with back shipping). Do any of you have experience with this hybrid on NEO turbo? I quickly look thru the forum/web and it seems very good.
×
×
  • Create New...