Jump to content
SAU Community

RB26DE for sale at JMS


Recommended Posts

The Autech R32 "26" was a bit of a fizzer in my opinion. It was a pretty boring looking R32 with less power than the GTS-t Type M at almost twice the price new. They were also all autos.

Not everything Autech does is gold. They also produced the R32 "Driving School Sports Sedan" version which was about as base model as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol yeah got the brochure for the driving school one...

BUT it comes with 2 sets of pedals dude lol... i wanna own one of those... actually no, my mates will always press the accelerator when i go past cop cars n take corners.

Autech just makes speciatly cars, ones that factories don't make, but the public wants. Its not necessarily a sports tuner. Tommy Kiara, Impul and Nismo on the other hand are sports tuners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

these look liek and interestign engine

there was one of these car for sale on yahoo ages ago they were auto and 4wd and 4 door. 250 shouldnt be hard with a few tweaks ie cams etc

Water cooling serial 6 cylinders * DOHC Cylinder

Inside diameter x distance mm 86.0×73.7 Entire aerodynamic volume displacement cc 2568 Compression ratio 8.5 The highest output

PS/rpm 220/6800 Largest torque

Kgm/rpm 25/5200

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Interesting engine.....

Compression wise is still the same with the RB26DETT?

If it does, I wonder if It drives.

It's a nice rare engine. But I don't think it worth the price since now adays you can get a newer engine fron Nissan (even in NA) that has meet the 206kw japanese limit (on paper).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if its the same engine autobahn's reffering to. its an rb26 na autech special which supposily rev's to 9 or 10? i can't remember which but some high figure. guess what you expect from an autech special...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
  • 1 year later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...