Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when i changed my stock turbos to -7's there was no way in hell i was gonna put back the stock dump pipes, while everything is out you may aswell do it

i got lucky and found some r34 gtr dump pipes, much much better design than the old 32/33 items

Would have to be big power...they are very short pipes so there is no real time for the gasses to be held back...being that they are exiting the turbine at near supersonic speed (I no make that up)

Quick edit - Also, whilst the standard dumps are quite small, they are still larger than the turbine exit, and only have 3 cylinders worth of gas flowing down each one.

So whatever size the stock dumps are, 2 1/4" or so, that is quite a large exhaust for a 1.3L motor

Fair enough. BUT why do our cars respond so well to larger front pipes, cats and catbacks?

Wouldn't it be better to have 2 3 inch dumps going into a matched twin 3 inch front pipes rather than out of turbo, into something larger then into something larger again.

Perhaps on a 430rwkw+ car this is where the bigger dumps count? As Ash said at 350 or so the dumps are not as restriction .... YET

I don't doubt somewhere they offer benefits. From what I've seen though around the 350-370 not so much.

I mean i wouldn't be making 370rwkw on 19psi if there was an exhaust restriction, you'd soon spot it nose over.

There is more length in the front pipes, and more again in the catback also the gasses lose inertial the further down the system they go, so the friction on the pipe walls start to have more of an effect.

Also as a little bit info info, The only friction in an exhaust pipe is within 3mm of the pipe walls, so effectivly the radius of the pipe - 3mm, and there is no friction on the exhaust gas outside 3mm of the wall

So thats what im getting at re: the turbine outlet compared to the dump pipe, Also works for exhaust manifolds, if you want no restriction then have your primary pipes 6mm in diamiter larger than your exhasut ports (obviously less applicable if you throw a turbo in the mix)

  • 2 years later...

i know im ressurrecting an old thread here but in relation to

i got lucky and found some r34 gtr dump pipes, much much better design than the old 32/33 items

arnt the R34 ones longer? so do they fit propeperly to the R32 Front pipe, or does it make the exhaust sit stupid low off the car?

and, does the R34 front pipe offer any gain from the 32 stock? (or would it be better going r34 dump, to aftermarket front, to aftermarket catback)

i know im ressurrecting an old thread here but in relation to

arnt the R34 ones longer? so do they fit propeperly to the R32 Front pipe, or does it make the exhaust sit stupid low off the car?

and, does the R34 front pipe offer any gain from the 32 stock? (or would it be better going r34 dump, to aftermarket front, to aftermarket catback)

No, they are all the same length

Yes, the 32 ones are just garbage, the 33 ones where a massive improvement over the 32 and the 34 are fabricated instead of cast but IMO don't offer much if any of an improvement in flow over the 33

Split V bell, if the split is designed correctly then the split are better IMO, it is just easier to get the bell mouth to work then the split

I use both of the CES racing designs, factory replacement ones on the 32 and the longer race ones on the 34, when I'd did the 34 ones that was all that changed, unfortunately it didn't go on the same dyno for retune though it did need more fuel as they made it a little lean

ohh thanks for that mate,

only other query. does anyone know the dimensions of the stock front pipe. i got out and measured it this morning.. because i believe mines still stock.

my split pipes were 20cm circumference (63mm diameter externally) and meeting in a 24.5cm circumference (78mm diameter External) pipe. im assuming i would be able to find some gains through replacing these. Im running N1 turbos atm, and at 19psi making 248awkw, tuned for mid range and SMOOTH power curve.. but seems alot of boost for the power.

my only power mods incl.

greddy FMIC (unknown size.. looks same as stock, maybe fractionally larger)

modified actuators on the N1s

apexi 3" catback.

Vipec ECU and electronic boost solenoid

my last (stolen) GTR had the above + cam gears, and cutsom dumps/front pipe to 3.5" decat. and it was 298 awkw on 21psi (2 psi more)

Edited by harks

Stock R32 GTR ceramics, I have

Apexi Z32 pod filter kit with Z32 AFMs

UAS cold air feed

Adjustable cam gears

CES racing pump pipes and front pipe

MetalCat cat convertor, has since been changed for HKS cat convertor

HKS Superdragger cat back

Greddy oil cooler, no filter relocator

Exedy twin plate

HKS EVC 4

Apexi Power FC

nice, you would have a hella responsive build using the stockies.

so really the 3 big differences are:

You have cam gears

your using z32's

and you have custom front/dumps

(although im not suing a standalone EVC, using it via the ECU i dont think that should matter?)

for 50wkw... hrmmm....

Any thing over 2800rpm is instant boost and it is a very angry car

The cam gears made a big difference both in response and top end

The Z32s are the best option when using the Power FC

Not custom, I have these ones

http://www.cesracing.com.au/products_2.htm

The two at the bottom right, I have the silver ones on the 32 and the black ones on the 34, what have you got ?

The EVC just means I can easily change boost level with the touch of a button, the type of controller I have means the wastegate doesn't creep open till the car gets very close to the preset boost level

Setup and tune have alot to do with, my car was initially tuned by a very well known tuning company in sydney and it was rubbish drove like shit and I only picked up 0.1 seconds on the quarter, changed there bodgy Z32 adapters to the apexi ones and took it to Insight, drove better then it did when factory and picked up another 0.5 second one the quarter going from 11.8 to 11.36

Any thing over 2800rpm is instant boost and it is a very angry car

The cam gears made a big difference both in response and top end

The Z32s are the best option when using the Power FC

Not custom, I have these ones

http://www.cesracing.com.au/products_2.htm

The two at the bottom right, I have the silver ones on the 32 and the black ones on the 34, what have you got ?

The EVC just means I can easily change boost level with the touch of a button, the type of controller I have means the wastegate doesn't creep open till the car gets very close to the preset boost level

Setup and tune have alot to do with, my car was initially tuned by a very well known tuning company in sydney and it was rubbish drove like shit and I only picked up 0.1 seconds on the quarter, changed there bodgy Z32 adapters to the apexi ones and took it to Insight, drove better then it did when factory and picked up another 0.5 second one the quarter going from 11.8 to 11.36

Have been in the car. You would not expect this off a standard car. I would rather this tha some of the bigger power cars that I've driven due to the area under the curve, let alone boost recovery.

yeah still running stock dumps/front pipe.. which for the 32 is pretty sub optimal. someones selling a set of the standard CES pipes (not the racing ones) for a good rate, im juist weighing up weather i pick them up (At a good bargain) or get a 3.5" front pipe and cat-back.. cause turbo';s will need to come out for installation.

i was origionally going to get cam gears, but my tuners like.. nah why would you do that? thasts a waste of time.. takes a long time to tune, not worth it unless using cams.. i thought that odd. awell.

addition to my last.. how much would i expect a workshop to charge to pull the turbos off and install the dumps/front? im thinking 2-3 hours labour so maybe 300-400? or am i way off?

and what about cam gears? 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...