Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Question, being a private/ closed event spectators need a ticket, am i right in saying nobody can rock up on the day for a look?

have a few people interested but they don't want to commit till the day.

  • Replies 436
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thats correct, spectators must be done in advance. The closest they'll get on the day is the front gate and you cant see anything from there.

Thats WSID'd rule, and to be honest it's a good one, so unfortunately if people wont commit to the day it wont work for them.

Money Transferred and entry sent by email

Looking forward to this as this will be my first time down the strip.

If I want to add extra spectators to the list (only have 2 at the moment) do I just send an email to same address?

i will be attending, depends weather i have the money to race before it fills up or not... will be doubling my car.

at the moment we are to be set as spectators.

Mathew Becroft (D1-COP) X8 Cressida - RRH007

Garry oliver (jasper63) X8 Cressida - RRH007

Jordan bradshaw HR 31GTS-X coupe - GTS20X

Richard Diaz R31 aus delivered

Amber shortus

Krystal cash

Myself, Garry, Jordan and Richie are preparing the cars and organising the money and will pay for racing as soon as we can... as i said, if we do miss out on a race spot we will definitely spectate.

Count me in

I will fill in the forms and make payment soon. I havent read the entire thread but has the list been updated? or is it correct that there is more spectators than entrants?

Is the cost set $220 regardless of how many people enter? or will the final cost be dependant on numbers entered? and i gather spectator tickets are allocated to entrants before anyone else?

I have 5 spectators

Andrea Chenouda

Greg Tolpigin

Daniel Nichol

Hilton Smith

Jan Smith

I hope you dont mind but i have also added a link to a thread on vwgolf.net.au. The owner of the forum was trying to organise a day at WSID and isnt having much luck getting a response back from WSID staff. I am sure they will be able to help make up numbers

Edited by ido09s

Yes lots of spectators, don't worry though entrants spectators will all get in over non entrant spectators if it comes to having to choose depending on numbers.

Don't be worried about spreading the word, the more the merrier to be honest.

SPREAD THE WORD PEOPLE THIS MUST SELL OUT 40 SPOTS

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...