Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just after some info on these. As iv got a set. And dont know weather to use them or sell them off for a t04z.

Iv got the inturnally gated set, that sits in the stock looking position.

What are some good supporting mods?? ie cams and stuff.

Cheers

James.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365731-twin-hks-gt2835s/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine are the bolt on standard position ones. So they are a bit smaller than he high mount kit. I think 0.6 front and 0.640rear.

Wanna push them high 300's plus. Got the engine and Haltech ready for support. Now turtle things like cam size injector etc.

Its gonna be a dog to drive. But its not going to be a daily.

Come on mate your talking about getting 2 turbos capable of 450-500rwkw setup and you cant be bothered having a 2 second look at hks site for the different sizes. Either do some serious research or just walk into a quality performance joint and tell them how much power you want and see if you can afford it.

The HKS GTRS makes about 250rwkw on a well setup RB25.

The HKS 2835 Pro S makes about 270rwkw on a well setup RB25.

So yes they are bigger.

They will be one of the laggiest ways to make high 300's.

Mine are the bolt on standard position ones. So they are a bit smaller than he high mount kit. I think 0.6 front and 0.640rear.

Wanna push them high 300's plus. Got the engine and Haltech ready for support. Now turtle things like cam size injector etc.

Its gonna be a dog to drive. But its not going to be a daily.

"push" them to high 300's? They wont even be awake flowing that much! Why not get a set of turbo's suited to you goal? It will make for a much nicer (and quicker) car!

There is quite a range of HKS spec turbos called GT2835 but the chief thing to remembe is that they are based on a GT30 turbine so the 28 part is marketing slight for what is actually a GT3071R turbo , just ones with cropped turbines .

Long story short they came with GT28 or GT30 based turbine housings and either could have T25 or T3 flanges .

The ones you have would be the low mount GT28 0.64 A/R RB26 based turbine housing version bored out to suit the cropped GT30 turbine .

These are from memory the largest low mount IW HKS spec Garrett ball bearing turbos used as parallel twins on RB26 heads . I would not expect these turbos to be what you'd call responsive given that they are 250+ Kw capable units on their own . I believe they use the same turbine housing castings as RB26 style GT2530's and many people don't even consider 2530s to be responsive turbos on std capacity RB26's .

The bottom line is that you cannot have it both ways with turbochargers and when you have an engine car combination that needs turbo boost to make healthy torque getting some boost in early makes all the difference .

An RB26 is a short stroke short rod medium bore low compression ratio inline six . It is designed to rev and equipt to make good power for the capacity but not at low or what most consider "normal" engine revs . We know its entirely possible to make a lot more power than Nissan did standard with these engins but increasing the state of tune with larger turbochargers almost always pushes the onset of boost higher up the engines rev range . The higher up it is the less accessible it becomes when trying to drive these cars "normally" .

I personally wouldn't have anything larger than 2530s on on a GTR even a dual purepose street/club car . For pure street it would be GTSSs and enjoy the fact that you can have a GTR with good road squirt but without revving the piss bags out of it all the time .

In my book you 2835s are drag race turbos and for a pure quarter mile car not a bad starting point .

I think they are impractical for much else but thats just my conservative view .

A .

pointless post from me but be sure to note there is twin 2835 with internal gate and external gate setups

twin 2835s regardless like disco says is stupid

its a cropped GT30 setup basically

and who runs twin GT30s????

imho for the original poster the T04Z would probably provide much more linear response vs twin that large

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...