Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

havent updated for a very long time.

cars painted

cars on the road

car goes like a ripper

went to a dyno day today pulled 288rwhp on stock turbos on 15psi

some recent pics here

DSCF4055.jpg

DSCF4018.jpg

DSCF4015.jpg

DSCF4004.jpg

DSCF4002.jpg

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Its a faaaarkin awesome build dude not knocking it for a second but a 2J has 500cc more so personally i think it can do alot more than a 1J sure it could probably go toe to toe on a dyno in a HP shootout but that half litre more just gives you torque more turbo response which may not look that different on a dyno but the drive would be very different

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

awesome work mate love it. want to know how you made the engine mounts as im looking to do the same to my r33. i already have motor as i own a jzz30 soarer as well but want to swap motors any info would be great

i have found mounts for your s series nissan crossmembers and from memory the s14 crossmember are interchangeable with r33 not 100% sure though and as for the sumps im not to sure about that will have to look into it

you need a front sump yes. i have a few rear sumps here and they are useless i cant even sell them!!

i made my own engine mounts and run the r32 cross member and rubbers.

just sit your engine in the engine bay where you want it and fab up the mounts yourself.

get the motor as low as possible and as far back as possible.

pretty simple if you are handy with the tools

  • 4 weeks later...

so the engine was down on compression and the valve stem seals were causing a lot of smoke

so i got stuck in and built a new 1jz up for it. took me 2 weeks to build it myself and get it in and running.

got the urge for more power so i went with a t66 turbo, and a few little other supporting mods

still runnning a stock ecu with safc2 controller

finished with a total of 413 rwhp 308rwkw at 24psi

here are some pics

2012-06-02201337.jpg

2012-05-27105830.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...