Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The storey I get is that all turbo RB25s and 26's have the same size and shape chambers and valve head diameters as well . A look around in aftermarket valve circles will tell the storey here if not in factory WSMs .

You could also look around for std reeplacement R33 and R34 RB25 pistons to see if the crown height/style/dish volume is the same .

I tend to think the six throttles and twinned turbos give a std RB26 lower restriction gas paths at high revs .

People should think of compression as dynamic rather than static and I think in many cases the 26's would be higher dynamic once the throttles opened up more than a tad .

I think the main difference between std 26s and Neo 25s is that the Neo would make better part throttle torque because its not intended to be a power at revs engine like 26s were intended to be .

I think valve train wise hydraulic cam followers , buckets if you like , are going to be significantly heavier than plain buckets , "solids" , so less valve train innertia for the valve springs to have to control .

Hydraulic buckets are all about no maintenance because they self adjust enough under normal operating conditions .

It is a major and expensive PITA to have to reset clearences on an under bucket shim engine like an RB26 or FJ20 .

Belt off pulleys and cams out to remove the buckets so you can get at the shims .

It always made me wonder why people ran single throttle and single turbo RB26s particularly if it was in a RWD car , if they changed pistons rods and cams then about the only minor differences are the stroke and slight port differences . Some might argue that a 26 block is a bit stiffer but how many people break blocks in a RWD car ?

The jury is still out about twin scroll single and parallel twin turbos so IMO probably the best thing 26s had was the six throttle inlet system and possibly the water riser/log system .

If you can live without these then a Neo should be cheaper to buy and still have the non hydraulic bucket valve train .

A .

So how do the AWD block RB25s neo and non neo differ from the RB26? Many of the Stagea blocks I've seen have interchangeable sump and sump parts with the Rb26.

Edited by WHITE gtt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...