Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I can hook you up with an Hdi cooler, but you might want 3" piping on the outlet, yes?

So what's the standard inlet/outlet pipe diameter of the HDI cooler?

So reducer required from standard piping into & out of intercooler. No worries.

I had another question re the HDI model, but might post in a more relevant thread. Cheers.

So reducer required from standard piping into & out of intercooler. No worries.

I had another question re the HDI model, but might post in a more relevant thread. Cheers.

Reducer comes in the kit Leon.

In fact everything you need comes in the kit.

  • 2 weeks later...

RE the FCON V Pro - Will it definately offer better performance then the EMU?

No one knows whether it can do speed cut right?

POssibly have a cheap one lined up....but want to make sure i'm not wasting my $$ for another pointless tune!

ALso what's the difference between v3.0 -v3.24?

Edited by ironpaw

Well that's what I'm trying to find out. What can it do better then the Emanage? It obviously has something better to offer then the EMU otherwise why are you holding out for it?

I.e. if Cihan tunes both will there be any difference performance wise?

And no one can confirm whether it can overcome speed cut right?

Just trying to save some $$$ for the future if I ever need it :happy:

Holding out for it?

Scott has his and mine is on the way from the US as I type this (fkn finally!).

Yes, it is better than the eManage. You have to keep in mind that while the Pro-V plugs in like a piggyback, it does not manipulate the ECU's signal. It sends it's own signal to the engine.... but we have already covered this.

Why not just wait and see?

If you want to know if the one you are looking at is suitable, send me the link/description.

Holding out for it?

Scott has his and mine is on the way from the US as I type this (fkn finally!).

Yes, it is better than the eManage. You have to keep in mind that while the Pro-V plugs in like a piggyback, it does not manipulate the ECU's signal. It sends it's own signal to the engine.... but we have already covered this.

Why not just wait and see?

If you want to know if the one you are looking at is suitable, send me the link/description.

I'm waiting for the guy to send me a pic of the serial number...cheers

I'm waiting for the guy to send me a pic of the serial number...cheers

Have you got a VQ25det harness?

Weren't many left when I ordered mine.

EDIT: you need the serial number to be 20,001-30,000 for a 3.2/3.24. v3.3 is 30,001+

There are some that may have been re-flashed by HKS when they provided the service though (they don't any more)

Edited by iamhe77

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...