Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh dear, looksee what has happened now.... We may have lost one of our brightest, consistent and most informative poster's ever !

Damn you, Damn you all

I needed to know so much more..... and now..... i never will

*sigh*

I know, I'm sorry.confused.gif

Please come back UNDR8ED; all is forgiven.

Please share your boundless knowledge of how to use unnecessary capitalisation and numerals within words to convey your vast wisdom; we are lost, and have much to learn.

Edited by Daleo

I know, I'm sorry.confused.gif

Please come back UNDR8ED; all is forgiven.

Please share your boundless knowledge of how to use unnecessary capitalisation and numerals within words to convey your vast wisdom; we are lost, and have much to learn.

I can't even pronounce his name without help.

Is he under bed ? Thats just plain weird man !

Damn it .....I was wondering if he was ever going to inform us the the m35 doesn't have an RB! :P

Seriously what a f{:content:}amp;ktard!

FARKEN WHAT!?!?!? thats the reason i bought a Stagea for all the plentifull and cheep RB goodies to bolt on :( damnit should've bought a skyline!!!

My GTX3071 made 288rwkw on 98 at 21psi im now on E85 and at 18psi made 307rwkw and on 22psi with major boost leaks got up to 312kw with predictions of theoretical possibility of 350rwkw.

GTX3076 some boys are making 360-400rwkw on E85

so whats the figures on these???

GTX3071.......... is that the stage 1 hiflow option? 270kw max?

GTX3076.......... and this is the stage 2 hiflow ? 270kw+ ?

My GTX3071 made 288rwkw on 98 at 21psi im now on E85 and at 18psi made 307rwkw and on 22psi with major boost leaks got up to 312kw with predictions of theoretical possibility of 350rwkw.

GTX3076 some boys are making 360-400rwkw on E85

is that on a VQ25DET with 4WD ? otherwise those figures are kinda pointless...........

altho a HP figure on the crank would be useful :)

My GTX3071 made 288rwkw on 98 at 21psi im now on E85 and at 18psi made 307rwkw and on 22psi with major boost leaks got up to 312kw with predictions of theoretical possibility of 350rwkw.

GTX3076 some boys are making 360-400rwkw on E85

I have your GTX3071 at 278.5 as tuned with 98ron. It is a bigger jump with the E85 than you are quoting. Keep in mind my old school GT3076 with ATP TS housing seemed to come on earlier than the smaller 71mm GTX with 98ron.

The claims of 360-400rwkw with E85 might be coming from a certain dyno which seems to produce some higher results than many others so make sure you compare apples with apples. Early results show the GTX3076 to be very similar to a GT3082 aka GT3040. The turbine has proven to be the limiting factor on these turbos.

Scotty has the bigger Tial housing (from memory) so the 76mm GTX compressor will have every chance but ultimately I reckon the 71mm compressor is not the limitation.

It peaked at 288kw but was bought down to a "safe" 278kw :whistling:

Dyno figures for the GTX3076 are in the RB25 dyno thread dont know what dyno was used simply requoting figures

You love bringing up that the ole 3076 comes on sooner than the GTX dont ya mate lol :nyaanyaa:

I'm guessing the current gtx3071 is good for around 320 on ethanol, on an m35, hopefully the 76 can add 30 to that figure so around 350awkw, perhaps a little less with the .82 rear on it. That's the next goal anyway.

Not sure the box will be happy with that figure, even the 33gtr box I hope to slip in may not handle it for long.

so whats the figures on these???

GTX3071.......... is that the stage 1 hiflow option? 270kw max?

GTX3076.......... and this is the stage 2 hiflow ? 270kw+ ?

These are not highflow turbos, they are large housing surge ported Garrett turbo's with external gating, much more chance of a higher figure.

Will the GTR box drop straight in scotty or will it need mods? Has anyone ever looked into or tried Cryotech for gearbox parts dont know the exact process but they use liquid nitrogen and put them under vacuum i believe and claim that it hardens things by 300% NASA stumbled on it when all the space shuttles returned harder than were originally made? I recall seeing its around $60 a kg or something would be a cheap alternative for a hardened GTR gearbox if the claims are true :blush:

I'm guessing the current gtx3071 is good for around 320 on ethanol, on an m35, hopefully the 76 can add 30 to that figure so around 350awkw, perhaps a little less with the .82 rear on it. That's the next goal anyway.

Not sure the box will be happy with that figure, even the 33gtr box I hope to slip in may not handle it for long.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...