Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This has me a bit excited after reading so many negative comments about the new GTX version turbos. I am hoping to have my build complete in about 2 months with a GTX3071R 0.82.

:)

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have to admit that I am still a bit unconvinced that all things are equal here, not deliberately - but.

I also can't see any reason why the GTX would spool any faster, it would be absolutely awesome if it did.... but its at odds with all other results, and with the general likelyhood. Being more or less the same wouldn't surprise me so much though.

The "GT3076R" dyno plot also looks more like what you get with a faster ramp rate - but the on road difference does sound promising.

i can assure you there's no trickery with the ramp rates. i have nothing to gain/lose by doing this comparison. i wasnt being paid to do it. and did it out of my own interest/pocket. the results are clear as day and the on road feeling confirms the difference. true test shall be tomorrow at mallala tho :D

I imply I don't think you (or anyone) are trying to fudge the results, just look at the relative shape of the different curves - its like there is something more different than just the turbo. Curiouser and curiouser, etc.

Obviously its a no brainer thats its either a good or a great result, as basically its definite that the new turbo will make more power - if it makes it with the same spool then thats awesome.

Any chance you accidentally ended up with a GTX3071R? ;)

I imply I don't think you (or anyone) are trying to fudge the results, just look at the relative shape of the different curves - its like there is something more different than just the turbo. Curiouser and curiouser, etc.

Obviously its a no brainer thats its either a good or a great result, as basically its definite that the new turbo will make more power - if it makes it with the same spool then thats awesome.

Any chance you accidentally ended up with a GTX3071R? ;)

i'd be stoked if a 3071 could flow that much power at that much boost.. has anyone done any testing on one at 25+ psi?

How much boost should I tune mine for when it is finished being built?

Turbo is GTX3071R 0.82 on an RB25DET Neo with a forged and balanced bottom end.

i'd be stoked if a 3071 could flow that much power at that much boost.. has anyone done any testing on one at 25+ psi?

Keep screwing it in until it makes the power you want and isn't out of the efficiency zone. Check the compressor map and see work out the rough max psi you can run before it'll be out of the zone.

Edited by Rolls

I imply I don't think you (or anyone) are trying to fudge the results, just look at the relative shape of the different curves - its like there is something more different than just the turbo. Curiouser and curiouser, etc.

Ye the way it comes on so hard is still making me look @ the graph over and over.

Wondering if during the swap there was perhaps a slightly split line or something causing a minor issue not neccesarily noticeable.

Simon - were the hoses etc all replaced or was it a literal 'bolt off/on'?

What about the actuator sitation - same or new?

(not having a go, just thinking outside the norm here)

And side question entirely, are the GTX housings different to the GT ones? (ive not really paid attention to that?)

Either way - more more tuning around the 4000rpm mark. Sure looks like it could bring up a massive mid-range increase which would make it MUCH more than 10% gain. Almost 20% if it keeps picking up like it was, would be very impressive

was a true bolt on swap, boost control lines not touched. i run a tial 44mm extrernal gate. and yeah when time permits we might try putting a degree of timing in around the midrange to help it.

let me just say this tho... with a super responsive set up and such a large wack of torque in the midrange. traction is very difficult. i believe for circuit stuff you wouldnt want this type of arrangement. you'd want to opt for a larger rear and lazier ramp to prevent wheelspin.

to save some confusion...

settle time of 3sec, ramp time of 7. both runs. increasing either of those times would mess with the results but they were both done the same.

simon has swapped to a 4.11 from a 4.35 diff but the dyno was set accordingly so it shouldn't mess with it at all.

i didn't touch the tune for the gtx. i can see a few spots i'd like to tweak but this was just a quick run up. I had no time to mess with it.

the one thing i did note was that i had to turn up the boost controler a touch to get the boost to the same point again.

simon has swapped to a 4.11 from a 4.35 diff

wouldn't that in effect change the ramp rate as the ramp rate is measured via wheel speed and the ratio of wheel speed to engine speed is now different?

Edited by D_Stirls

Purely from what you see through the comp housing of a GTX3076R . These compressor wheels appear to be eleven bladed where the GT37 series BCI-18C wheels have twelve . As we know the GT37 ones halve six full height and six splitter blades and only the full height ones sweep over the radial slot in a port shrouded compressor housing .

One of the things you notice when looking at GT series compressors and turbines compared to T series ones is their axial length and it would be interesting to to compare this on GT and GTX compressors .

I'm a conservative in the turbo world and that makes me think that they are looking to get higher airflow rates at mid range wheel speeds but at higher pressure ratios . To me the islands on the maps are a bit narrow and thats why I think they could do with a larger compressor housing - if not a higher A/R one .

Garrett do make a 0.70 A/R T04E compressor housing but its an ungainly looking thing with the same inlet and outlet diameters as and isn't much if any more compact than the T04S housings which are more common things anyway .

In the State FP makes up "HTA" compressors for upgrades to Garrett BB turbos and I think they use a T04S housing on their HTA30R turbo .

I can only go off trends I see with other compressor wheel families in sometimes a number of different compressor housing families and I think these GTX wheels are getting to the stage of needing larger housings than the GT25BB center section can support . Also making up adapter rings to get say GT40 compressor housings on GT25BB center sections means more inventory for a very low volume , aftermarket , rage of turbochargers . This is really where the larger center section/frame Garrett BB turbos come into their own , native to larger housings both sides but they are starting to get away from being "compact" turbos . Also few are itegral wastegate and many use T4 international flanged single and twin entry turbine housings .

I work for the Intermodal Division of one of the interstate rail freight carriers .

A .

wouldn't that in effect change the ramp rate as the ramp rate is measured via wheel speed and the ratio of wheel speed to engine speed is now different?

From what decs said I'm assuming the ramp rate was adjusted to compensate.

From what decs said I'm assuming the ramp rate was adjusted to compensate.

When i read that is assumed that they made the changes to make sure that the RPM signal was correct so the graph was displayed correctly, not that they adjusted the ramp rate by 5.7% to make up for the change of ramp rate that the engine sees. But after re reading it i'm not sure?

Edited by D_Stirls

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...