Jump to content
SAU Community

Rich + More Ignition, Or Lean + Less Ignition, What Is A Safer Way To Tune?


Recommended Posts

What does MBT stand for?

mean best torque

the point at which, as you advance ign timing, the engine makes the best torque.

say at 3,000 rpm and 10deg timing, the engine makes 200nm, 12deg might make 205nm, 14deg makes 207nm, then 16 deg makes 205nm, then your ign timing for MBT is between 14 and 16deg.

happy to be proven wrong, thats just how I understand it...

P.s. for the mathematically minded fellas out there, I've always struggled with understanding the relationship between power and torque...

I know the power is the amount of work done with respect to time, and that torque is a rotation force, but dont understand how they interact!?

If is accurate to say that torque is the derivative of power with respect to engine RPM???

Edited by StealthX

mean best torque

the point at which, as you advance ign timing, the engine makes the best torque.

say at 3,000 rpm and 10deg timing, the engine makes 200nm, 12deg might make 205nm, 14deg makes 207nm, then 16 deg makes 205nm, then your ign timing for MBT is between 14 and 16deg.

happy to be proven wrong, thats just how I understand it...

Is it always the case that torque will drop off after MBT if you keep adding timing?

I was of the impression that it would just stop making any more torque.....I'm guessing it might be dependant on the set up itself?

P.s. for the mathematically minded fellas out there, I've always struggled with understanding the relationship between power and torque...

If is accurate to say that torque is the derivative of power with respect to engine RPM???

Power is directly proportional to torque x rpm.

Think of torque as the instantaneous force, rpm is how many times a second that force is being put out, hence why your power can still increase even though torque is decreasing.

Another analogy is torque is the force of each cylinder explosion, rpm is how many explosions per second. So if you have lots of explosions but they are weak (low torque, high rpm) or not many explosions but they are very powerful you can have the same power (high torque low rpm).

P.s. for the mathematically minded fellas out there, I've always struggled with understanding the relationship between power and torque...

I know the power is the amount of work done with respect to time, and that torque is a rotation force, but dont understand how they interact!?

If is accurate to say that torque is the derivative of power with respect to engine RPM???

relative power = torque x rpm

basically if you have a perfectly flat torque curve from 0 rpm to redline (never happens, i know, just an example) the power will double when you double the rpm. so if your making 100kw at 2000rpm, you'll be making 200kw at 4000rpm, 300kw at 6000rpm and 400kw at 8000rpm etc.

torque is the force that is exerted by each combustion cycle, power is the overall force produced by the engine (as revs increase each combustion might be less powerful on its own but its happening faster, therefore more combustion cycles in a set period of time).

Is it always the case that torque will drop off after MBT if you keep adding timing?

I was of the impression that it would just stop making any more torque.....I'm guessing it might be dependant on the set up itself?

Yeah not sure on that one... I was under the impression that more ignition timing past MBT will make more heat, thus less dense intake charge and less power. sorta like a turbo out of it's efficiency range. boost = timing and power = torque.

Power is directly proportional to torque x rpm.

Think of torque as the instantaneous force, rpm is how many times a second that force is being put out, hence why your power can still increase even though torque is decreasing.

Another analogy is torque is the force of each cylinder explosion, rpm is how many explosions per second. So if you have lots of explosions but they are weak (low torque, high rpm) or not many explosions but they are very powerful you can have the same power (high torque low rpm).

right! got it....

thanks!

MBT is actually maximum brake torque, or peak torque, i.e. the peak of the torque curve. After the point where the maximum amount of torque can be achieved cylinder pressure drops, ideal for more timing to be added to continue to make power.

If you look at many stock ignition maps (not stock PowerFC maps) you will see after the peak torque, igntion timing will increase. Do a trace map on a stock ECU for any newish car and you'll see after MBT, more timing is added. A good example would be a 4G63T map.

I guess that's just my opinion though. Jez I will need to send you another email BTW! You may be disapointed, may not haha.

look out guys we have a trader among us. First of all he was putting a toyota motor in his skyline. But now he is buying a silvia with sr20.

All good im an ex silvia owner. :ninja:

a couple of points. the formula for Power is torque in ft lbs x rpm over 5252, this gives power in hp. secondly adding timing after peak torque does not increase EGTs in my experience. if anything it lowers them. even when detonation occurs they will keep dropping, altho damage will obviously occur.

It makes sense for timing to always reduce EGTs as you are keeping the explosion in the cylinder for longer so more heat gets absorbed.

Edited by Rolls

I use both too, its the only accurate way to see whats going on isnt it? Im sure most tuners would prefer to have them in the dash if possible. I used to run the egt sensor in the dump and noticed a 100 degree increase in temps now its in the manifold.

When tuning last month I noticed as we increased boost past a certain point the power didn't increase but torque continued shooting up, how can this relate to your equations?

Thats because torque is on a finer scale the whole way through, its why I prefer to tune to MBT using the torque curve - its easier to spot differences. Its also way torque curves often tend to have huge dips etc if the dyno software allows you to scale to just minimum torque to max torque, instead of 0-max torque.

Its not an explosion Rolls. Its a burn

its actually a deflagration ; )

(I knew)

I use both too, its the only accurate way to see whats going on isnt it? Im sure most tuners would prefer to have them in the dash if possible. I used to run the egt sensor in the dump and noticed a 100 degree increase in temps now its in the manifold.

When tuning last month I noticed as we increased boost past a certain point the power didn't increase but torque continued shooting up, how can this relate to your equations?

That is because peak hp isn't at peak torque. So you might have had more tweaking around peak torque to do, but not at peak hp.

Edited by Rolls

The engine will give you the answer. We have tried tuning lean with minimal timing but running it at low 11's with more timing doesnt make much difference to our car. A richer tune will leave more room for safety unless its on the ragged edge with timing.

Most RB's i have seen that are running 20+psi have always liked to be tuned in the mid to low 11's

  • 2 years later...

Just dial in timing till the motor stops making power or knocks for a certain rpm, then proceed to next rpm band.

Joys of e85, keep pumping in timing till the power drops as it doesn't knock.

Joys of e85, keep pumping in timing till the power drops as it doesn't knock.

I have almost the opposite opinion, more boost, 11:1afr and keep the timing on the lower side of MBT for best longevity, especially at the point the torque hits hard.

E85 knocks just like petrol but at a much higher boost. Definitely need knock ears on the block for WOT tuning...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...