Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Keep going deeper

Nothing is ever fine, even if you have a fresh set up. Shit happens.

My main point is, the guy has taken it to a tuner, good chance a reputable one and since I havent had personal experience with them its hard to be sure.

They have probably done a fair few and probably a whole heap of other cars with similar turbos and is aware that they are ceramic. This isnt the mid 90's

where info and experience is limited. We have thousands of GTR's in oz now.

The guy is happy with the work, even notes that hes getting better highway mileage. Then all this touting that hes running too much boost and scaring

the poor bugger into turning it down. I doubt any of these guys were there. All they are doing is touting shit that they read/their mate did/etc. So straight

up giving flack to this tuner because he decides thats what the engine likes and he can make it live.

No one is scaring anyone by giving the facts and potential dangers, better to have the information & make an informed decision - than not at all. It's just comes down to a calculated choice as follows.

Can you afford the rebuild?

If you can, carry on.

If you can't, then play it safe.

What one deems to be safe - arguable. There is enough evidence from users personal experience to make a reasonably informed "idea" of safe - if you wish.

Of course "shit happens", thats life. But you can reduce the risk of shit "happening", is all people are saying.

There was poor bloke recently who lost a forged motor by putting stock turbos back on as he didn't have the cash for nonceramic at the time. Running 1bar too. That's the stuff that is really shit and really hate reading :(

As I said via pm tho, that much boost is asking for a dead motor for the sake of 20rwkw, I strongly urge you to consider lowering the boost to a safer level for longevity of turbos, and in turn your motor

dead motor due to the turbos grenading? or dead motor from that much torque?

Then all this touting that hes running too much boost and scaring the poor bugger into turning it down. I doubt any of these guys were there. All they are doing is touting shit that they read/their mate did/etc.

We are pointing out that he's running a high risk, its up to him to accept that risk or not. There is plenty of evidence that these turbos fail quickly at that boost, and quite a few instances where turbo failure has destroyed the engine. It makes a very poor cost/benefit trade off for most people.

None of us were there, but what's the relevance of that? We are taking OP at his word, and assuming that he understood what he was told. If we dont make those assumptions there's no point in responding.

FWIW, my stock GTR turbos failed at 13psi. Fortunately, no motor damage.

This is a community, and as such we should look out for each other. If I were in OP's shoes, i'd want to know about the risk.

ido09s it was definatly Jim. There are only 3 guys there and Jim does the tuning. I called him a few times while the car was being tuned. And yes, he did say the dyno reading on paper was 20kw less than actual power figure. Feel free to call him and ask

dead motor due to the turbos grenading? or dead motor from that much torque?

Turbo failure. Rear turbo fails usually, ceramic dust/particles end up scatterd across the piston top/eating up ringlands and on occasion some marks on the valves.

Not really sure how torque/stock turbos is going to kill a stock RB26

My car made 350kw....

Well the dyno sheet says 296kw but :ninja:

If ur car makes 261 on the dyno thats what u tell everyone it makes. 4kw max round up so u made 265 and i made 300kw

Glad ur happy with the tune he gave u.

REMEMBER.its just a number. There is ALOT of variable when comparing different dyno's.

Like comparing apples and oranges

I'm not trying to bullshit power figures, I'm simply going off what I was told at Dart and I don't think Jim would be bullshitting either. Whatever the actual power output is I'm happy with at the moment... I'm not looking for a 20kw cock extension like some people do.

I'm not looking for a 20kw cock extension like some people do.

Haha u hit the nail on the head.

Doesnt make sense why a tuning shop woul have there dyno calibrated 20kw lower than it should be then tell customers.

I use a mainline aswell as Rondofj stated and unlike dyno dynamics u cant fudge the figures as easy. Like cheating with inlet temps etc.

Who gives a f**k about all these replies!? As long as your happy and confident in your tuner then who cares what everyone else thinks?

You and I both know that if the thing blows up tomorrow, that your in a pretty good financial position to get it fixed anyhow thumbsup.gif

Bring it around on the weekend. I wanna go for a spin!!

I'm not trying to bullshit power figures, I'm simply going off what I was told at Dart and I don't think Jim would be bullshitting either. Whatever the actual power output is I'm happy with at the moment... I'm not looking for a 20kw cock extension like some people do.

Your tune is perfectly fine , my stock turbos have been running 1.2 Bar near 300KWs , Tuned by a highly respected tuner in S.A 6 years ago still going strong , enjoy it !!!!!yes.gif

yeah and thats the exact key to the issue

if you can afford it and are willing to wear the risk go for it

many have run that boost and survived

and im sure there are equally as many who have ran that boost and failed

my car is the same

GTST with std turbo and running 0.85kgcm2 for years+++

many have failed at this level and let go taking the motor with it

im aware of the risk and if it happens, it happens

the key is, can you afford it and wear the risk

if so enjoy

if no, turn boost down as precaution

Yeah, you're probably right global warmer lol. I'll come round Sunday if you're gonna be home? You gonna have your car back for next Sunday?

Nissan gtr thanks for the vote of confidence... seems like you've done well and proof that it is clearly possible. To back that up and those questioning the power output with standard turbos, when calling around and talking to a few reputable tuners in Sydney, quite a few said that I could see anywhere up to 290/300kw including the guys at advan who someone mentioned earlier. Thanks for all the input positive or negative none the less

well ok i got a little dilemma with tuners theories. 1 tuner tells me on standard bottom end with cams and a big turbo to be safe you need you retard the timing and set the cams to 0 and the boost is quiet laggy

then i talk to another tuner and he goes, if you advance the timing and up the cam timing (or whatever it is) but control the torque you can have full boost by 2800rpm

p.s this isnt on a rb26 but just an example???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
×
×
  • Create New...