Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here is some interesting reading. http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/support/manual/LC-1_Manual.pdf

Previously discussed, it does mention that the sensor should be kept to 900f. It is the same sensor that bosch manufacture and recommend a max temp of 1000c. Go figure.

It also recommends calibrating the sensor frequently so this mornin I'm gonna calibrate me a sensor, yup.

4.3 Calibration Schedule

Normally aspirated daily driver:

- Calibrate before installation of new sensor

- Calibrate new sensor again after 3 month of use

- Thereafter calibrate once a year or every 20,000 miles, whichever comes first

Turbo car, daily driver (tuned rich):

- Calibrate before installation of new sensor

- Calibrate new sensor again after 3 month of use

- Thereafter calibrate twice a year or every 10,000 miles, whichever comes first

Race car

- Calibrate before first installation of new sensor

- Calibrate once per race weekend

Dyno use

- Calibrate a new sensor

- Calibrate every 2-3 days, depending on usage

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

as i explained before the temps are at different places.

I disagree. I don't think that the difference you are talking about is measured by bosch. Could be but I doubt it. The sensor is the part that will die not the housing. It does mention on the pdf that for track use the sensor should be 36 inches from the turbo so it doesn't cark it.

SimonR32 youtube us up :thumbsup:

  • 3 weeks later...

Quick question for those using the UEGO, is the gauge supposed to not give a reading on decel? I installed my kit the other day, but haven't had much chance to play around with it yet. On the one drive I took it on, I noticed the gauge would display "- - -" while on decel, is that supposed to happen? I thought it may have been because there won't be much air going into the engine on decel, but then I thought surely if it gives a reading at idle then it should give a reading while it's in gear?

Edited by Hanaldo

This is why they say it's more fuel efficient to pull up to lights while downshifting rather than just putting the car in neutral. Fuel is required to keep the car running at idle. Your drivetrain is doing this under decel so no fuel is needed

Edited by 89CAL

Quick question for those using the UEGO, is the gauge supposed to not give a reading on decel? I installed my kit the other day, but haven't had much chance to play around with it yet. On the one drive I took it on, I noticed the gauge would display "- - -" while on decel, is that supposed to happen? I thought it may have been because there won't be much air going into the engine on decel, but then I thought surely if it gives a reading at idle then it should give a reading while it's in gear?

Yep normal, gauge reads up to 18:1 and on decel the mix geats leaner than this so it displays those --- instead.

The XD-16 is discontinued, shame they didnt test the LC1 but I would assume it would be just as accurate from the comparisons I have done.

Lol @ PLX and NGK, + or - 1.0 afr... >_<

Still able to find them but they cost almost double the price of the AEM. I want to get one of these for my car, get rid of the narrowband and put this in its place. My ECU isn't using it so it would be just for me to monitor the ratios.

The XD-16 is discontinued, shame they didnt test the LC1 but I would assume it would be just as accurate from the comparisons I have done.

Lol @ PLX and NGK, + or - 1.0 afr... >_<

pretty sure the XD16 was used with the LC1 in that test. the XD16 is just the display, you still needed the LC1 controller to work with it (i had one).

I love my LC1.

Works great, and piece of cake to re calibrate. I quite like the re-calibration feature. Do it every time the car gets an inspection.

The only issue being they have a high failure rate. From what i can gather from the interweebs they changed their manufacturer at some point and there were a few dodgy batches around. I got one that failed withing a week.

But they replaced everything at their cost incl shipping. So thats good, and its been perfect ever since.

^ Plus you could also wire it into your ECU if it allows it and set up closed loop, and target AFR :D

So you are saying you can use the wideband and ecu to dynamically control afrs? Surely something my power fc can't do lol. I might pick up a innovative unit. Shop near my place has them plus 12 months warranty

Here are results from a wideband shootout, you can google and read how they compared it along with a industry sniffer.

chart_lg.jpg

Innovative is both accurate and quick to display it's numbers.

I remember this test. Very controversial test.

We have spoken to Mr. Mike Kojima the author of the Fordmuscle shootout and got first hand test details. According to Mr. Kojima his article was edited prior to the publication.

The tests were done using Innovate methodology and Innovate equipment.

There were several major flaws in the test, including but not limited to the way the O2 sensor was exposed to the test gases.

One of the major test flaws was reading the AFR value from the Zeitronix Zt-2 analog output using the Innovate logger. There is a voltage drop on the power-ground wire caring 12W of O2 sensor heater power and offsetting the AFR value. Reading the AFR value from the Innovate digital output but logging a raw Zt-2 voltage using Innovate logger subjected the Zt-2 AFR reading to the voltage drop, noise and Innovate logger analog to digital conversion offsets and conversion time.

The Zeitronix ZDL datalogging software should have been used to read the digital AFR value from the digital output of the Zt-2; not any other product brand.

Using the Innovate analog logger to read the Zt-2 (and other wideband meters) analong AFR value gave Innovate LC-1 unit, a half track length advantage in this 1/4 mile race. We either start from the same line or this test is not valid at all. This is an absolute violation and unscrupulous action.

The same goes for the "latency" measurement. The Zt-2 AFR readings were obtained by using the Innovate logger and software.

The Zeitronix ZDL software was not used in the test but scored the lowest.

For those who use our ZDL software know that hitting Enter starts logging, Enter stops. What's easier? "Clap on, clap off"?

Let me point out again that the other unit, which does not come with any logging software scored higher in the "Software" category.

Moreover, the Zt-2 scored the lowest in "ease of use" category. In order to get the AFR value from the Zt-2 all it takes is two wires to be connected to +12V and ground plus the O2 sensor placed in the exhaust stream. The Zeitronix LCD display plugs and powers up directly from the Zt-2.

As you suspect, Fordmuscle is sponsored by Innovate.

Eng

Zeitronix Inc.

A lot of aftermarket computers will take a wideband input in the 0-5v range, I've got my AEM output wire in place ready for when I upgrade my management and can make use of the wideband readings.

Having a local supplier for the Innovate would be good too given some of the failure info around just in case that still applies.

As an aside, My AEM shipped with an ever so slightly suspect 4 pin harness, I contacted my supplier through ebay and he had AEM send me another express from the states no questions asked.

Who you deal with from a retail point of view is just as important as which product you buy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually everyone on the roads was really well behaved. The only person that did any minor tailgating was a local hoon in a Turbo Focus. Unfortunately we weren't going the same way so there was no grand initial D touge battle. Lots of people pulled over and let me through. The amount of "Hey man nice car, omg skyline, nice 34 man woo" was suprising. Like really suprising. Like almost annoying. My partner was obviously surprised, she'd never seen anyone in the real world point out the car/like the car/want to chat about the car before, so to have like 3 people per day mention it was notable, I could finally say SEE? SOMEONE THINKS THEY'RE COOL. Everyone was also pretty suprised about the weather. Every day was dry and about ~13-14C. Mount Wellington had a sign that said they close the gates at 9pm and I was heading up there at about ~7:30. It was VERY apparent that conditions were getting significantly worse by the minute on the way up and down. The road on the mountain was terrible though, it's no driving road. I have various suspension related questions now. Luckily it was only about 20 minutes from where we were staying to the top of the mountain as said Google maps. We only had the 2 nights in Hobart. We went to the Farm Gate Market though which was really good - And went down to the Hastings Thermal springs/caves down there during the day. I'd definitely be up for going back again, so luckily there's a few more sights yet to see. Didn't get to do the west coast/queenstown/cradle mountain so this was supposed to be a 'scouting' trip anyway of sorts if I were to one day do/take part in/organize a more car-focused trip. As for the boat, it wasn't bad. Well it was bad, but not in the way you're thinking. We did the night trip which leaves at 6:45 (though you have to be there ~2 hours earlier) and arrives the next morning at about 6am. There is nothing to do on the ship. If you plan accordingly and bring a book/tablet/show to watch/charger you can just chill out, take some Travacalm and just sleep through it. The food there is an extremely basic buffet that costs $32 a plate, or $14 for a $3 pizza. The way back we had a travel kettle and a few different types of cup noodles and made our own tea/coffee in the room. This was a far superior way to do it. At the very least book one of the rooms with beds. I guess as we were in the off season we didn't have room mates. You get an option for rooms with 4 beds (2x bunks) or a room with just the two bottom beds. There's also some option for a deluxe queen bed but it's much pricer. We've been on sleeper trains in Asia before so we figured this is similar (and it was)
    • You just gotta be really, really, really clear and decisive with what you want your end product to be. 99% of people who want this conversion aren't "I want to run a 295 front tyre!" so they don't really need the widebody. They just want the OEM body to look a little less dumpy, so bonnet, bar, skirts job done with some camber, stretch, slam. It's when you want that, but then decide to pivot later you get big problems. See also if you're willing to get an all in one fibreglass bar, and you're willing to accept fibreglass problems like cracking the entire item on a driveway, instead of just a piece attached to the bottom, etc etc etc. Decide this all before buyin'.
    • After @Kinkstaah debacle, I'd never want to try and get it right 😛
    • The hood lines up with the fenders. The front bar doesn't perfectly line up with the fenders where the wheel arch is. You have to 'squeeze' the front bar 'in' as it wants to naturally flare out and be longer on the sides. There's a few threads where people notice this when they only swap a GTR style bumper and front bar. Unless you have genuine OEM items - you may be better served getting conversion kits. There are GTT bumpers to fit GTR hoods. There are GTR hoods (non genuine) to fit the GTT bracketry. MAY  
×
×
  • Create New...