Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am. 20psi I should have 300 but sitting on 250ish. apart from little small issues probably not related to the turbo or power it self, its great. Just seems like a fussy turbo so to speak as everything needs to be pretty perfect on the intake and exhaust side to get the desired results. I recommend over any other turbo for a stock motor. If, though, response is not a concern, get a kando.

good call yes..

but I am a little concerned with mixed responses about what a stock motor can handle..

I was using the 15psi actuator until coil failures waiting on a tune but talking with Stao i advised that i wanted 18-20psi (using a DSBC) and he advised the motor may not handle it , then in the next sentence advised to get the 20psi actuator So ai guess you will see why I am a little confused

hence the question..

Dazza

Edited by itshimdazza

I think it really depends how you drive Dazza, long squirts will cause higher piston and exhaust temps, waiting until the engine oil is up to operating temp before thrashing it could help too, but in reality with double the stock power your unopened engine is close to its limits, and so is the fuel. Are you planning on an e85 tune down the track?

Scotty,

I dont any long quirts only the odd up to the limit and accasional overtake. But since its my daily it rarley gets the full boost so I dont think that will be a problem, I have the 650 injectors but dont plan on a E85 tune in the near furure.

I am runnnig @ 230 rwkw on say 14-15 psi presently and hopefully when i get the tune finished with the 20psi actuator on friday i hope this will be the end of it, maybe 250 to 280 (for a while at least, lol)

Dazza

Edited by itshimdazza

Hard to compared the Garrett items, remember the HG items are not running as large of a rear housing and hence they always fall off around 7000rpm where a 3076 never will. So it'd be interesting to see just how much hotter everything is for the same power levels etc.

Either way there is no "magical" number. 260-270rwkw/18psi would be the smart choice with a good tune. Should last quite a good while.

Yes 280kw seems to be the limit of reason, aiming for 260-270 seems like a smarter choice as mentioned.

The motor will happily see 300kw but it is a fairly mixed bag when it comes to long term longevity of the motor. I know people that live long and prosper with a 300kw RB25 and others who would kill one in a 'piece of string' scenario.

However I would say 20psi is not as much of a problem as 300kw is. I would rather run a little less timing up top and a little more boost to get the desired output. Focus more on mid range for your torque.

20psi is fine as long as it's been safely tuned. I'm making 287rwkws at 19psi out of their .63 OP6 high flow for over a year. No issues of what so ever.

The ATR43SS1PU runs a big .84 rear housing with top notch response using what they call fnt turbine setup so judging by size its not getting hotter then any thing else in its HP range.

How ever they are very skeptical with free flow intake and exhaust, So make sure you have them before taking to the tuners.

I'm unsure what actuators Stao fitted onto your turbo, ask them to supply a stronger actautor only if boost drops below expectation with act of boost controller. how ever it could also be none actuator related.

Edited by GeorgesR34

I was told 20psi was pushing the limits of the head gasket and/or head studs? Is this not the case?

not the case. boost pressure isnt the be and end all when it comes to reliability. just use it as a rough guide.

aslong as there was no knock and temps were kept under control theres no reason you couldnt run 30psi with a standard h/g and head bolts

20psi is fine as long as it's been safely tuned. I'm making 287rwkws at 19psi out of their .63 OP6 high flow for over a year. No issues of what so ever.

The ATR43SS1PU runs a big .84 rear housing with top notch response using what they call fnt turbine setup so judging by size its not getting hotter then any thing else in its HP range.

How ever they are very skeptical with free flow intake and exhaust, So make sure you have them before taking to the tuners.

I'm unsure what actuators Stao fitted onto your turbo, ask them to supply a stronger actautor only if boost drops below expectation with act of boost controller. how ever it could also be none actuator related.

the FNT nozzles are adjustable, so if there is an issue with boost drop a change of nozzles that is supplied with the ATR SS may be required

I am about to head down this path myself with a gt3582r. I'm going to push the engine as far as the fuel pump will allow as that will be my limiting factor. I find it interesting that people are always referring to a "safe" tune. In my opinion there is either tuned "properly" or its not. When I tune a car it doesn't knock and the afr's are "normal" ie: 12:1ish at full load. How else would you tune your car? You sure as hell wouldn't tune it so it knocks excessively. In saying that you run as much timing as you can whilst still making power. You wouldn't run 5 degrees less than it could handle when you could run 5 more and it still doesn't knock. Sure you can run more or less fuel at full load. My point is that when I hear people talking about a safe tune it makes me wonder if they actually know how to tune a car. When you are pushing an engine to high hp levels you get the tune right or you f**k your motor quickly.

I should have it dyno'd in about a month so I'll let ya all know how it goes. Check out SimonR32's car for reference to this thread.

safe tune = a tune that wont go anywhere near the engines limits no matter if its 50degs outside or -50deg, or WOT at 8000rpm in 5th gear up a hill etc.

Simply doing a 7 sec run on a dyno in 4th doesnt show how the car will react on the road/track

Think of it this way.

Race car gets tuned by you on a dyno...a few runs in 4th gear with the dyno fan on flat out.

Goes out on track and is following a car for 2-3-4 laps with bugger all airflow through the intercooler/radiator....IAT's go to over 100degs...and ping ping ping ping BANG

same can be applied to the road but not to the same extreme

Ye there are street tunes and track tunes certainly. You can generally be a little more agressive on a street car as it's not doing flat out 3-6 laps at a time.

Where a street car with a bit of spirited driving, won't be going near those types of temps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...