Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've only fitted the Fronts R32 GTR on. I used a shim to fill the space from 14-12mm. They are quite a good upgrade, and I don't find any bias issues from the upgrade.

My rears are stock. As you've said, the rears aren't bolt on. Brembos however are bolt on all round, with the obvious trim of stone guards.

  • 3 weeks later...

ah cheers mate!

when you did the 350z mid pipe. asides from the extension was it a straight bolt up?

even thought the 350 pipe uses larger tubing, just have the chance to get a hold of one for my stagea if its an easy enough fit.!

cheers again!

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, she was asking for something shiny and gold coloured for Christmas, so what choice did I have??!!

post-76224-14203233507393_thumb.jpg

If anyone is interested in a R32 GTR front setup (with sleeves to suit c34s2/m35) let me know via pm.

  • Like 1

Hard to say.

I had a bit of a spongy pedal, but I think there was a smidge of air in the rears, cause after we bled that out it felt 1000x better. Would have liked to compare apples to apples.

They certainly provide very confident performance.

Nah, just the fronts.

Nope, no more power planned. Unless my money tree fruits and I can get some headers and cats, the tune is pointless.

Should be taking the Berk HFC's off my car in the next month or two Alex.

Can put them with the unused & ceramic coated 350z headers that I have here if you are interested.

Edited by iamhe77

Black magic indeed.

I was not sold on HHO injection, but have spoken to some Aussies that have done H2 injection (venting the oxygen prior to injection) and all results/testimonials are positive although they do vary with just how effective it has been.

Will certainly post with results/lack of results when I finally get to installing it all.

  • 2 weeks later...

A bit of a pictorial wrap up of the first round of the Nulon Nationals at SMSP. Held on a wet skid pan, it's a Motorsport event that pits 9 forum based car clubs against each other in club level Motorsport events. I represented SAU NSW. The courses were measured out CAMS motorkhana courses, not very suited to our Nissans being much, much tighter than what we run in our texi days, however we put in a good showing and banked some good points to move onto the next rounds.

post-76224-0-33225400-1421647085_thumb.jpgpost-76224-0-70301600-1421647100_thumb.jpgpost-76224-0-18868800-1421647116_thumb.jpgpost-76224-0-60182200-1421647130_thumb.jpg post-76224-0-22171000-1421647144_thumb.jpg

Thanks to the club Prez for the pics!

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...