Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

So I've Finally got around to building a RB30DET for THE-31 which is my Aus Spec R31 TI Which was bought new back I'n the day by my grand parents and handed down.

So what i acutely want to know with MY set up (not someone else's) is what power figures i would be looking at? What are my Restrictions? And what are my weak points?

Here is what i have.

Block:

- RB30E

- Bored 40Thou Over

- ACL Forged Pistons

- ACL Rods

- ACL Big & Small Bearings

- ACL Gasket/Seal Kit

- N1 Oil Pump

- STD Crank

- STD Water Pump

- Underdriven Harmonic Balancer

- STD Sump

Head:

- RB25DET

- Ported & Polished

- STD Valves

- Stronger Springs

- STD Lifters

- Tomei Poncams 256 In/Ex

- Works Adj Cam Gears

- Greddy Copy Plenum

- Q45 Throttle Body

- Stainless Hi Mount

- HKS Waste Gate

- GT35/40 With AR.70/ M24 Front Housing

- Split Fire Coil Packs

- MLS 4 Layer Head Gasket

- VRS Gaskets/Seals

Fuel:

- Bosch 044

- 2L Surg Tank

- Denso 880CC Inj

Also Have:

- RB25DET Gear Box

- Apexi Powrer FC

- 3in Exhaust

- 3in Stainless Dump Pipe

- 600x300 Front Mount

- B&M Oil Cooler Kit

- STD Clutch Fan (Do Have EL Thermos But Took Them Out)

What Do You's think?

Thank you for any positive feed back.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

By the looks of that youre pretty much sorted.

On thing I can pick is using the ctandard con-rods which will limit you to around 7000rpm and be safe

and the N1 oil pump measn you wont be able to do rev limiter skids

Apart from that and it isnt a biggie is that stainless high mount manifolds like to crack, and the cheap ones tent to have boost control issues.

As Zebra said, I think your limiting factor will be your pistons/rods (depending on how much boost and the fuel you want to run). IIRC the ACL "forged" pistons are not actually forged - I could very well be wrong, but I remember reading something along the lines of this in the RB30 thread...

Also to note - be wary of the condition of your valve-train (lifters mainly!). I may be having issues with my setup caused by ageing valvetrain or insufficient spring stiffness/seating pressure. At an absolute minimum get your head reco'd whilst its off and out of the car.

Edited by R32Abuser

Thanks For the input fella's.

Ive had the car running with the bottom end set up how it is for awhile now just With a RB30et running probably 200Rwkw. 

The piston are 8.5cr, the rods are ACL but not H-Beam or anything, i was fairly sure the pistons were forged??

The heads got new valves and stronger springs and was recod but the same can't be said for the lifters :/

Any idea of power figures?

Two things I will mention, I just got some Reimax gears for my N1 pump, for AU$430 delivered it would be something to think about doing.

Get a decent sump just for safetys sake, I run an ASR 6.5L baffled/gated item.

Power? Probably looking at ~350rwkw?

Do you have the VCT connected and running? Is that a Garrett 35/40 or a copy ( I thought Garrett woulkd be .63 rather than 70 exhaust).

Should make 350kw ok maybe more with a really good tune. 3.5 or 4in exhaust would be good.

What about a pic of your mint one owner car?!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...