Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Duly noted, thank you peeps. And thanks for the butter recipe Ham. Omelettes are badass and their simplicity and low mess make them win at life. My omelettes are so busy I have to use a handful of cheese as a binding agent or it goes Hindenburg on me...

Would love to add vegetables for texture, but I don't want to mess with my all meat tastes. Parsley as a pub meal garnish is as far as I would go!

the humanity

Waxed bonnet, then cbfed the rest of the car so now I have a nice smooth bonnet but nothing else :D

Dat arm / shoulder workout rubbing that bitch off

Edited by UNR33L

Yuck what for?

was driving normally 5th gear doing about 70-75 in a 80 zone coming back home from work literally 2 mins away from home yellow one pops up out of nowhere tailgaits me puts the lights on and shit. Partner was a good bloke but main guy was pretty rude. He warned me for my rear licence plate for being bent and unable to read from a 45 deg angle. Got a fine for driving manual on auto licence (my fault for not booking my test sooner so not complaining left my car at site and walked home) but also for "failing to display p-plate rear" even though it was up and on factory uv cut tint that has passed Rwc he said he couldn't see it and gave me a fine and 3 points....I was on 1 point before this so licence is bye bye unless I contest. :(
I got done for the EXACT same thing.

It would of been 4+ years ago, on my P's in my N/A R33 just when green P's were just introduced.

Pulled over - done for manual with auto license (had the re-test booked but you know vicroads delay and what not, fair enough $150 and my fault) Then also said P plates not displayed cos you couldn't really see them that well through the tint, and with water on the rear window. $150 and 3 points for that as well, I wrote a letter to Vic faggotpolicegayflamin mongrels and got out of the P plate thing. From then had to display them on outside of car with magnetic P plate on the back which were sometimes taken but meh.. got through my Ps eventually.

Then got a 33r off Ps, random EPA etc in the mail and just had enough in general sold up and got a ford, buy a ford. inb4grant

No points at guessing which flamin mongrel pulled me over ;)
Edited by UNR33L
  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...