Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone able to give me some pointers on where to mount the racing harness?

Its a 3 point harness the rear top straps are mounted to the rear seat beats bolts cant work out where to mount the bottom half of the harness any pointers will be appreciated.

Its in a R34 GTT without a roll cage.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381089-some-help-installing-racing-harness/
Share on other sites

Use the search function, there are lots of ways to do it but most of them are wrong.

You don't want a harness if you don't have a roll cage either, if you roll the far the harness will hold you upright and your head will act as a roll cage, but with your head made from meat and bone you will be dead.

Use the search function, there are lots of ways to do it but most of them are wrong.

You don't want a harness if you don't have a roll cage either, if you roll the far the harness will hold you upright and your head will act as a roll cage, but with your head made from meat and bone you will be dead.

I'll take a harness in a roll over crash over a seat belt with or without a roll cage any day thanks.

As to the question from OP, the BEST thing to do, is actually grab the CAMS regs on mounting and get the angles right. As for the nut strap, you will most likely need to drill straight through the floor, and put the mount in. You can buy certified mounting plates from around the place that the loop will bolt into.

As for the nut strap, you will most likely need to drill straight through the floor, and put the mount in. You can buy certified mounting plates from around the place that the loop will bolt into.

Before you drill, MAKE SURE you're not going to pierce through fuel or brake lines, or drill straight into a wiring harness.

3 point harness hence no nut strap, only correct way IMO would be to install a harness bar, you can use the bolt on the seat belt slide thing on the right side but you will need to drill a hole in the floor on the left side and use a backing plate.

Look at a few cars that have rolled over, its the top of the seat that stops it from going any further down, if you cannot move out the way its going to be your head that stops it.

Do a risk assessment on it and see what you come up with.

Mark " safety devices that are installed without thought will be just another risk "

In my R33 I have a 4 point harness that uses 3 mounting points.

I used the following:

Front bolt for the OEM seatbelt rail for the right hand side

Rear left seat bolt for the left hand side

Made a bracket that bolts onto the parcel shelf for the rear mounts

I'd take photos when I get home, but home doesn't have internet at the moment :laugh:

Off the top of my head I think CAMS recommends a maximum of a 45deg angle from the horizontal from your shoulders (or something to that effect). Any more than that and the harness will tend to pull you down, puting extra strain on your spine (source: Eric the CAMS scrutineer at the old Oran Park drift days :D) This means that your rear mount from the rear seat belt is not ideal...

In my opinion, a harness with a OEM seat is far more effective in holding you in place that an aftermarket seat with OEM seat belts :thumbsup:

It will definitely hold you in place so you don't move around but that isn't what a harness is designed for, the seat holds you in place, the harness stops you from being thrown around in the event of a accident.

Thanks for all the advice guys i kind of got most of the harness installed except the bottom strap on the left. which i need to buy or create a plate to bolt one down.

I was originally going to use the normal seat belt my friend gave me his harness as a present so i thought i use it just for fun.

3 point harness hence no nut strap, only correct way IMO would be to install a harness bar, you can use the bolt on the seat belt slide thing on the right side but you will need to drill a hole in the floor on the left side and use a backing plate.

Look at a few cars that have rolled over, its the top of the seat that stops it from going any further down, if you cannot move out the way its going to be your head that stops it.

Do a risk assessment on it and see what you come up with.

Mark " safety devices that are installed without thought will be just another risk "

Look at the injuries sustained in crashes from front on, side on, and rear on from seat belts, and then from harness.

Then compare the number of total accidents that involve roll overs.

Even on the track, roll overs are the rarest form of accident.

Even if you don't have a roll cage, I'd rather protect myself from the most common type of injuries/accidents...

Thanks for all the advice guys i kind of got most of the harness installed except the bottom strap on the left. which i need to buy or create a plate to bolt one down.

I was originally going to use the normal seat belt my friend gave me his harness as a present so i thought i use it just for fun.

your lower left strap should be easy..

I ended up bolting mine onto my seat rail bolt as its directly opposite the bottom seat belt bolt and goes along the transmission tunnel unlike most other skylines that bolt to the floor..

Hope that made sense.. Basically to summarise.

bottom left strap - left rear seat rail bolt

bottom right strap - bottom seat belt bolt.

shoulder straps. bottom rear seatbelt bolts or rear child restraints or harness bar ( whichever is best location or available)

If i remember ill take pics of mine tomorrow

Thanks for all the advice guys i kind of got most of the harness installed except the bottom strap on the left. which i need to buy or create a plate to bolt one down.

I was originally going to use the normal seat belt my friend gave me his harness as a present so i thought i use it just for fun.

You are only going to be using this on the track correct?

If it isn't engineered and certified, and you're using it on the road, you can be booked for it.

In my experience it's a bad idea to use a harness on the road anyway. In combination with my dark tints and my low mounted Sparco Sprint V, blind spots get quite large and only get larger if I can't move my body :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...