Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 886
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm running an atr43 ss1. I was hoping for 240kw, but i am happy with the result, it drives really well, it's only running 14psi so it makes me think it's even safer. I'm not sure where the temp sensor was, the booth was a constant 24 degrees so I guess that would help a bit though.

Il post up the dyno later. But needless to say there was some big holes in the old tune. It was pinging on 7psi.

Do you realise that this is a completely new engine, better compression, and the CAS is probably in a completely different spot?

Don't get me wrong im very happy with it, I just expected to be running 18-20 psi like most other people.

Did you just randomly pick those numbers?

Do you know what boost the turbo is actually capable of producing efficiently?

I was actually referring the fuel maps having massive holes in them, the new maps are nice and smooth.

The turbo was built by stao to run 20psi, am I wrong to think it would do differently to what it was built for?

Considering youve got a SS1 not the SS1PU i think thats a really good result.

It comes on really well and had a good usable powerband. I cant see it falling off up top at all.

Take this from a Hypergear follower: that turbo is doing exactly what its meant to do. You should be very happy with that result, good work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...