Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

My girlfriend is looking for a new car to replace her old Corolla. She wants a small, fuel efficient, good looking, 5dr car thats reliable to drive daily. She will probably keep this car for 10+ years. Her budget is $20,000-$30,000 but she'd be willing to spend more if the value for money is there.

We're looking at almost all Japanese and European hatches. We're also considering the CT200h Lexus Hybrid. Its $44k but my girlfriends brother works for Toyota/Lexus and gets a 21% discount on all cars. Does anyone have any experience with the Lexus or Hybrids in general? Is the Hybrid technology good enough to last 10 years and 200,000kms if maintained properly?

Of the other hatches avaliable, does anyone have any personal experience with any? Any you would or would not recommend?

Appreciate any feedback, cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381640-best-value-hatch-for-daily-driving/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yesterday at Parramatta. $32K reduced from $39k is the Manual Citroën DS3 Sport. 1 left. Black. We looked Alfa Mito & Abarth too for another lady. The Auto DS3 isn't worth it since it drops the turbo.

Pretty much any of the small hatches from Ford, Holden or one of the Jap brands. Price wise/feature wise you could throw a hanky over the lot.

It's really a matter of which one does she like the look of better. Go test drive a few.

If I had to pick, however, it'd probably be a Festiva.

There's absolutely no need to spend upwards of $25k (in fact you should get change from $20k). I'd avoid the Euro brands.

Hybrid's are bullshit heavy and slow and not particularly fuel efficient. Lexus make great cars, but big money for a runabout, even with 21% off.

Recently I've driven an i30, Focus, Corolla, ix35, Dualis and a few others (Mrs is looking for a new car) and it's hard to find a bad one. The Focus was dynamically superior to the others, but cost more and in reality, for my wife, not really required.

Go test drive a metric shitload and buy the one which you gelled with the most.

Can you give us some more information please Keiran?

Perhaps you can answer these questions to help narrow down the selection criteria for us. I am looking at a near new (2008 or later) 5-door hatchback to replace my Peugeot 205 GTI that I've had for 14 years so I have been studying some of these models in depth.

  1. Does she want a brand new car or is she willing to get one that's a few years old and save thousands?
  2. Can your sister drive a manual?
  3. What size hatch does she want eg a Mini, VW Polo, Fiat 500, Citroen DS3 or the larger VW Golf, Ford Focus, Audi A3 size?
  4. If she buys a European car from the 'premium' brands like BMW, Merc, Audi or even the Japanese Lexus will she be able to afford the (usually more expensive) maintenance?
  5. Does she want a sports model like VW GTIs or Focus XR5 or is she happier with the more generic, better fuel economy models?

  1. Does she want a brand new car or is she willing to get one that's a few years old and save thousands?

She's willing to buy a demo model, but needs a new car. Her dad is paying $20,000 towards whatever she gets, but he is flat out against anything second hand.

2. Can your sister drive a manual?

My sister can, my girlfriend can't thumbsup.gif

3. What size hatch does she want eg a Mini, VW Polo, Fiat 500, Citroen DS3 or the larger VW Golf, Ford Focus, Audi A3 size.

Probably the slightly larger. She prefers the Golf over the Polo, but she'll consider them all.

4. If she buys a European car from the 'premium' brands like BMW, Merc, Audi or even the Japanese Lexus will she be able to afford the (usually more expensive) maintenance?

She could afford it, but I think it would be more than she realizes.

5. Does she want a sports model like VW GTIs or Focus XR5 or is she happier with the more generic, better fuel economy models?

She doesn't give a shit about performance, so long as its not absolutely gutless.

cant see why the latest 'rolla wouldnt be a good buy

corolla02.jpg

great build quality, excellent on fuel, CHEAP to service, looks great, and in manual its a hell of a lot of fun

totally worth the cash.

shit, even im thinking about it

This is what I'm pushing her towards. That 21% discount on an already excellent value car is just too good to pass up. Her main issue is she has driven a Corolla for the last 7-8 years and would like something else.

She likes the the FT-86 though, if only it were released this year!

She doesn't give a shit about performance, so long as its not absolutely gutless.

Corolla, Focus, 3, i30, Tiida (f**king stupid name that I believe is soon to be replaced by Pulsar again [yay!]), Civic, Lancer.

There's not a bad one amongst them. Spend a weekend test driving them all then pick the one you (she) liked best. You can't go wrong with any of them. They are a lot cheaper than the Euros, have nearly as many features and will be cheaper to run and more reliable (noting 10+ years ownership).

My pick would be VW Golf, preferably the Comfortline TSi (I think), 1.4l twin-charged unit anyway.

CHEAP on fuel, zippy, reliable & euro quality...

Only thing you would have to check out is servicing costs, etc

My pick would be VW Golf, preferably the Comfortline TSi (I think), 1.4l twin-charged unit anyway.

CHEAP on fuel, zippy, reliable & euro quality...

Only thing you would have to check out is servicing costs, etc

$35,000 later.

f**k that. It doesn't do anything one of the $22,000 japs won't do.

Get the 1.2L (i think?) gold brand spankers with DSG for 22, redbook says 77kw, 0-100 in 10.6 so not that bad.. Pretty economical...

Or you could get a japper for the same price with more features and 100+kw and a few seconds quicker to 100.

= not better than regular auto for the intended purpose here (regular A-B driving).

Probably cost more for servicing too.

You said she is not interested in performance so I would just play it safe & get another Corolla.

Edited by Mayuri Krab

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...