Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

martin - who can beat aarons paint job...think thats the main reason he won it.. :P

pat - 34s were very interesting...i was surprised my self how it ended up... denial deserved it any way...very clean car....

also thanks for people voting for me... appreciated their votes...it was a very close one....

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

HERE IT IS GUYS!!!!!

Best :

R31 – JESSE C

R32 GTST – PATRICK A

R32 GTR – JAMIE L

R33 GTST – JOHN R

R33 GTR – HARSH G

R34 GTT – CHARLES L

R34 GTR – DANIEL

GTR – DANIEL

GTST – CHARLES L

WRX/EVO – NICK M

DORIFTO – AARON F

INTRUDER – MOHSEN Y

Congrats on the winners. It was very close in numbers and i did go through it 3 time to make sure. ALL WINNERS MAKE SURE YOU ATTEND THE AWARDS NIGHT ON 21st TO RECEIVE YOUR PRIZE!!! If not there you will get nothing unless organised prior to the day.

Thanks again for everyone to make it a great day in the end.

tri - winningbanana.gif

Ohhhhh rigged!!

i voted for you!!

I now know what I need to win next years SnS.

A fluro vest.

hahahahahahahah

And better selection of purple drinks?

maybe get some sunkist in there.. i think alvin has been putting passiona in my baskets lol i came home and found a couple..

hell yeah and I like the kit on his car as well, wished mine looked as clean.

all the winners were worthy that's for sure.

and loved the mini show and shine out the back in the car park as well, next time folks wake up a little earlier!

,

hell yeah and I like the kit on his car as well, wished mine looked as clean.

all the winners were worthy that's for sure.

and loved the mini show and shine out the back in the car park as well, next time folks wake up a little earlier!

thanks man! its not like i can take credit for it anyway.. i didnt exactly do it all..

LOL Aaron, I came home with nothing but Pasitos with more dents on it lol.

hahaahha.. theres still a bucket of sunkist in my boot i cbf taking out lol

haha, mine is no where as crazy as Aarons. Helps break up the black on the car. If not define it with the bright contrasting colours. A bit of fun :thumbsup:

i copied your fuel cap cover.. lol i had some sticker bomb vinyl.. came up okk lol thanks for the idea

you shouldve won "most electrical hazards in a boot"

Fark off it's all insulated wires and they aren't even connected to the battery!

These people have something against us LOL!

For sure, didn't win the raffle, didn't even win a trophy. Got some free soda cans I guess.

Fark off it's all insulated wires and they aren't even connected to the battery!

For sure, didn't win the raffle, didn't even win a trophy. Got some free soda cans I guess.

soda win.

i have so many cans

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...