Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Daz was saying this is on a Hubber. Anyone care to have a guess at what the difference is between a hub and roller dyno?

My last figures were 375 kw at 4500, 425 kw at 5000 and 470 (6500) odd up top. Boost was 27 tapering back to 25 top end.

Interestingly was the difference between setting "2" and "3" on my controller. Setting 2 is 23 PSI (give or take) and the midrange was 50 KW less than setting 3.

It would be interesting to have both cars there, get out of one and into the other.

They're 63's IIRC.

Damn stout effort. I'm too wonder if the standard compact housing is/will hamper the GTX's. Power wise it seems up there but it's the apparent surge that might be an issue.

I'm fairly sure that chequered tunings dyno is setup so it's spot on with local roller dynos.

Gav made 500 on less boost, guess we won't really know without similar spec engines

Yeh, Trents is a RWD hub dyno, still he shouldn't need to justify his figures, it is on par with most of the other local tuners machines, but obviously dispenses with the wheelspin and over strapping required at that sort of power.

If you ran it on a roller I would expect to see minimal losses, although I still haven't been on Trents to compare my figures. As you say though, same dyno same day, or take them to the drags together is the only way to know.

Yeh, Trents is a RWD hub dyno, still he shouldn't need to justify his figures, it is on par with most of the other local tuners machines, but obviously dispenses with the wheelspin and over strapping required at that sort of power.

If you ran it on a roller I would expect to see minimal losses, although I still haven't been on Trents to compare my figures. As you say though, same dyno same day, or take them to the drags together is the only way to know.

Yeah, I was soley referencing to real gtx2863 compared to 2.5" gtx2863 with similar spec engines.

At a guess, the GTX stuffed into the stock housings will flow more air in the midrange compared to the anti-surge ones, which is why I heard what I assume was surge. (unless it was a cooler pipe or gasket, but it was only as it hit boost)

I would prefer the real housings myself, the slot is there for a good reason. Garrett wouldn't have added the complexity to the casting and machine work otherwise. But this was a stealth stock setup.

At a guess, the GTX stuffed into the stock housings will flow more air in the midrange compared to the anti-surge ones, which is why I heard what I assume was surge. (unless it was a cooler pipe or gasket, but it was only as it hit boost)

I would prefer the real housings myself, the slot is there for a good reason. Garrett wouldn't have added the complexity to the casting and machine work otherwise. But this was a stealth stock setup.

Thats right, 500kw, stock. even 450kw, stock is a good outcome. considering not many people crack 400 with -5's.

At a guess, the GTX stuffed into the stock housings will flow more air in the midrange compared to the anti-surge ones, which is why I heard what I assume was surge. (unless it was a cooler pipe or gasket, but it was only as it hit boost)

I would prefer the real housings myself, the slot is there for a good reason. Garrett wouldn't have added the complexity to the casting and machine work otherwise. But this was a stealth stock setup.

Okay so with all the GTX talk lately, here is my experience:

Put them on late last year when I built my engine. GTX2860's and keep in mind these are 400hp per turbo rating.

Used the anti surge compressor housings and added flanges to outlets etc to bolt to original pipework.

The good:

They are quiet,

They don't surge

After 4800RPM they really take off

Dynoed around the 480hp+ on Godzilla motorsports dyno

The bad:

Anti surge housings are not bolt in for GTR's

Don't come with turbine housing but you just use your busted -5, -10 bits that probably shit their bearings out from crap plastic bearing cages.

Laggy/lazy coming on, after a gear change due to anti surge ports.

Not suited to pump 98 as you really gotta pump some psi (25+) to take advantage of the stronger billet compressor wheel.

So the gun setup to get some sort of lower response with surge as a trade off would be the GTX's with a -5 front housing. Or run E85 or put em on a 3+litre engine.

I have some -5's ready to go onto my car, but still contemplating whether to give the GTX another chance with a different front from the -5's or just put the -5's in and enjoy. Ahh the joys...

Hey Sean,

After talking to you earlier in the year I also decided to stick with -5s as I'm gonna stick with 98 pump and I wanted a bolt on solution. I've had my fair share of headaches when I did my 3ltr a few years back.

pump some psi (25+) to take advantage of the stronger billet compressor wheel.

So the gun setup to get some sort of lower response with surge as a trade off would be the GTX's with a -5 front housing. Or run E85 or put em on a 3+litre engine.

I'm trying all of the above.

  • Like 1

Hey Sean,

After talking to you earlier in the year I also decided to stick with -5s as I'm gonna stick with 98 pump and I wanted a bolt on solution. I've had my fair share of headaches when I did my 3ltr a few years back.

Yep :) -5 are one of the best 'bolt on' setups if you want 330-470kw at the wheels depending on fuel and setup ;)

  • Like 1

Yep :) -5 are one of the best 'bolt on' setups if you want 330-470kw at the wheels depending on fuel and setup ;)

Did you use the -5 before on the non-built engine?

Or how do you come to the conclusion the GTX are laggier than the -5?

I have used HKS GT2530, GT-RS and now GTX2860 (all in their genuine housings) on a RB30 with stock cams, and the GT-RS were the only one which were REALLY laggy.

As they have been on the car inbetween I can´t really compare the 2530 to the GTX side-by-side, but my impression still is that the GTX are way better spooling etc. than the 2530...am I really that wrong?

BTW all turbos were running with about 1.5 bar / 22psi.

With my -5s converted into GTX 2863's it has really made a big difference to mine, and the lag Sean is talking of is a bit of a mystery, because I actually decreased lag and found a little bit more low down, and heaps from mid range to the top. Even with the cams on my -5s I found my cams to be a bit big 272/9.7 but now with the GTX turbos, the cams really seem to be more efficient, especially the mid range. I was going to take my cams back to a 260 but I don't think I need to as much now, the power delivery from these GTX's is fantastic IMO.

Hey Sean, maybe it's worth giving your 2860's another go, and get it tuned at NextUp, John really got the benefits out of mine quite nicely. And considering you have the same 2.8 as me, it doesn't make sense really that I have decreased lag with the 63's while you saw a decrease?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...