Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Stop now! I learnt long ago to stop counting the pennies when I comes to cars.

Don't forget dude I bought my s2 in 2000 back when they were the price of a new ss commo.

The money this has cost me over 11 years would have probably got me a nice 34r buy now.

That is the new Kai version, on paper it is meant to be better but I don't think there has been many outstanding results with them.

I think 89CAL has one, flick him a pm and he should be able to tell you more about it.

CJMotor is where I ended up getting my pro s from, delivered in like 3 days. Nice easy transaction.

The rear housing is different mate .68 for pro s which requires new dump and kai kit is .62 i think and Nissan factory dump pipe bolts up

What is the difference between the kai and ProS turbos?

That is the new Kai version, on paper it is meant to be better but I don't think there has been many outstanding results with them.

I think 89CAL has one, flick him a pm and he should be able to tell you more about it.

Chloride is where I ended up getting my pro s from, delivered in like 3 days. Nice easy transaction.

Chloride??? I googled it and no luck?

Both housings are 0.68 i think just the KAI comes with the Nissan dump style flange and anti surge slotted front cover. Ill have to double check the housing size, may be .64

Anyway:

873eea00.jpg

If i had to do it again id go for a gtx3071 or a hypergear. don't get me wrong, its a great turbo if you want to make around 250rwkw, but its certainly not a replacement for the pro s. seems a bit like a gt-rs replacement really

255rwkw is the most I've heard of bolted to a neo with cams. when i sort a few things out ill probably send it off to Stao for a look, so it will probably end up a HKS/Hypergear hybrid and ill win this thread

Stop now! I learnt long ago to stop counting the pennies when I comes to cars.

Don't forget dude I bought my s2 in 2000 back when they were the price of a new ss commo.

The money this has cost me over 11 years would have probably got me a nice 34r buy now.

here i am worrying about depreciation over the last few years, ouch.

you've had the same car for 11 yrs?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...