Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got some bad news

Car is struggling to make power

Made 317kw at 22psi on e85

They are going to run some tests on it tomorrow to see what the problem is

Seems about right?

i'm making 372rwkw on 24-25psi on E85 with -5's

the only restriction would be the turbo's

E85 won't make turbo's automatically make 50rwkw more top end that it would on PULP.

E85 gains are in the midrange, so you might've only made 317kw but the midrange would be a lot stronger than most others in PULP

ok found the problem! they did a smoke test and found that one of the gasket/hoses on the intake side under the plenum is cracked and is leaking pressure

not the motor :) but still a 3/4 day job to take it out and fix it... labour is going to bend me over! but it should make good power once its sorted!

Seems about right?

i'm making 372rwkw on 24-25psi on E85 with -5's

the only restriction would be the turbo's

E85 won't make turbo's automatically make 50rwkw more top end that it would on PULP.

E85 gains are in the midrange, so you might've only made 317kw but the midrange would be a lot stronger than most others in PULP

Seems a little low. 372 at 25 on E85

Seems about right?

i'm making 372rwkw on 24-25psi on E85 with -5's

the only restriction would be the turbo's

E85 won't make turbo's automatically make 50rwkw more top end that it would on PULP.

E85 gains are in the midrange, so you might've only made 317kw but the midrange would be a lot stronger than most others in PULP

317kw on e85 is shocking... clearly something is up with that sort of power on -9s

we've found the leak... going to fix it then try again!

i probably should get a smoke test done on my GTR.

that's the only thing that i havent tested it for.

i had issues with the idle searching, then i had the tuner block off the hoses going to the idle control valve under the plenum and i picked up another 1.5 of boost on the same settings.

i think all my hoses probably havent been replaced yet, and its an 89 GTR so pretty old hoses.

i probably should get a smoke test done on my GTR.

that's the only thing that i havent tested it for.

i had issues with the idle searching, then i had the tuner block off the hoses going to the idle control valve under the plenum and i picked up another 1.5 of boost on the same settings.

i think all my hoses probably havent been replaced yet, and its an 89 GTR so pretty old hoses.

yeh would def get one done to get the piece of mind that there are no leaks

and yes 375kw @ 25psi with -5s is sorta low... should be nudging the 400 mark

where are the common places for leaks when a smoke test is done?

all gaskets and silicon joiners. I had the sandwidge gasket between my intake manifold leaking (rb25) never would have found it otherwise, gained 4psi just fixing that, had to turn the boost down as it started to detonate.

I've still got std cams, which might be holding it back a little?

will be putting some type B poncams in soon, and will get smoke test done.

hopefully be nudging 400kw if everything is right.

Cams wont be holding you back. I've got 360rwkw on 19psi and PULP with -5s

20-22psi will see 380rwkw on PULP (stock cams, on 2 separate cars down here)

Others using E85 have hit 400-420rwkw.

There are other issues with your set-up

all gaskets and silicon joiners. I had the sandwidge gasket between my intake manifold leaking (rb25) never would have found it otherwise, gained 4psi just fixing that, had to turn the boost down as it started to detonate.

what kind of boost are we talking?

from 10 to 14 or something like 22 - 26psi??

all gaskets and silicon joiners. I had the sandwidge gasket between my intake manifold leaking (rb25) never would have found it otherwise, gained 4psi just fixing that, had to turn the boost down as it started to detonate.

Cams wont be holding you back. I've got 360rwkw on 19psi and PULP with -5s

20-22psi will see 380rwkw on PULP (stock cams, on 2 separate cars down here)

Others using E85 have hit 400-420rwkw.

There are other issues with your set-up

Well hopefully a smoke test can show if there are any leaks anywhere and when the cams go in the clearances will be checked so that should hopefully rule out anything to do with the head?

it very may well be a leak somewhere.

the car made less power when i changed my intercooler piping.

i made 350kw on 21psi on PULP then changed my piping because the stock one blew off and split. replaced it with a silicone one and it made 315-320kw on 21psi.

so it very well may be a leak somewhere in the I/C piping? maybe just enough to be bleeding out a slight amount of air?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...