Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking to replace the original radiator on my r32 but i'm not sure if radiator thickness or number of cores/rows makes a difference? Been looking on ebay and other part's sites and i've seen all different kinds like 40mm 42mm 50mm 57mm, not sure which to go for as i just want to replace the old one without having to make any other mods etc. Any help is appreciated Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/390276-does-radiator-thickness-matter/
Share on other sites

Thicker core == larger body of water + more surface area.

This pretty much just means that you can provide more cooling capabilities.

Unless you plan on pushing some serious horsies out from your engine you shouldn't need much more than stock core size (though with Aus weather, a little bit extra wouldn't hurt).

Be careful of the fit if you go non-standard size - you don't want the fan taking a bite out of the shroud... Some of the ebay ones dont fit at all.... You should be able to find an SAU trader with something to suit, and that would be a safer bet.

I run one of these Fenix 42mm radiators in my R33. Fits fine with factory fan shroud!

40 or 42 mm is the way to go as that will allow you to run the standard fan shroud and not have any clearance problems.

If you run any larger then you can have clearance problems and also your motor can run too cold if it is in close to stock condition. I run a 40 mm core with about 230kw and have difficulty getting the car up to normal operating temps even at track days and at Sydney Drags.

If you run any larger then you can have clearance problems and also your motor can run too cold if it is in close to stock condition. I run a 40 mm core with about 230kw and have difficulty getting the car up to normal operating temps even at track days and at Sydney Drags.

This is true!

Last time my car saw "normal" water temps was at Wakefield in December!

I have a brand new alloy radiator i think is for an r32 i have a 33 and only realised a year later when trying to fit. ill try find out. its about 40mm thick. pm me if your interested

Edited by abr33

But if u have a properly working thermosat it should self regulate the temps regardless of the radiator temps??

Brand new radiator, brand new thermostat. Factory temp sensor never goes over 70degC on the street

Is it worth it for a car pushing about 260rwkw? During the cooler days my average temps are 76 - 83C. On hot days I can see it rise up to about 88 - 89c on the power FC. I don't even need to be giving it a hard time. No idea if this is a concern or not...

Is it worth it for a car pushing about 260rwkw? During the cooler days my average temps are 76 - 83C. On hot days I can see it rise up to about 88 - 89c on the power FC. I don't even need to be giving it a hard time. No idea if this is a concern or not...

No concern. It's perfectly fine operating temperatures.

I have a 52mm radiator in my R33 and it fits with the factory shroud and clutch fan, so you can definitely get away with that size too. Been running it for a month or so now with no issues.

Agreed that Its perfectly normal to be into the 90's. Most modern cars run alot hotter than older ones anyway due to emissions so its not going to hurt. R34's run in the 90's stock. Thermostat starts opening at 84C i believe, fully open at 95. Whereas R33's open at 72C, fully open at 85C.

My OEM Nissan thermostat used to have the car sit at around 84-85C cruising the streets and highways. I replaced it with a higher flowing unit as i was getting a tad hot on the track. The aftermarked thermostat opens slightly hotter than OEM, be it 3C i believe. And now cruises at about 88C. It cools far better than the stock one though. I actually see a temperature drop when i give it a bootful lol. 300rwkw,

  • 1 month later...

Brand new radiator, brand new thermostat. Factory temp sensor never goes over 70degC on the street

I just thought some more about this- It aint right. Unless you are living in a very low temp area (snow areas) and have a low temp thermostat...

An OEM R33 thermostat doesnt start opening until the 70's so there is no way the water in the motor could stay that cold without flowing thru the radiator, and a very cold radiator at that...

I just thought some more about this- It aint right. Unless you are living in a very low temp area (snow areas) and have a low temp thermostat...

An OEM R33 thermostat doesnt start opening until the 70's so there is no way the water in the motor could stay that cold without flowing thru the radiator, and a very cold radiator at that...

Yep agree with that. Starts opening at 72/73C and fully open by 85.

And also, VCT doesnt even start working till ECT is above 75C.

I just thought some more about this- It aint right. Unless you are living in a very low temp area (snow areas) and have a low temp thermostat...

An OEM R33 thermostat doesnt start opening until the 70's so there is no way the water in the motor could stay that cold without flowing thru the radiator, and a very cold radiator at that...

Nismo low temp thermostat, live in Sydney

I'm not saying it's right, just what ECUtalk reports ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...