Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I would dare say it's not your manifolds, standard manifolds have proven to flow quite well to a certain point to which I believe is over 400kw.

What was your power figure before E85? and what are the exact mods?

I am running -5s and was putting out 350rwkw at 21psi on BP98, before my rebuild and I have a restrictive exhaust... Tomei dumps, restrictive front pipe, 3" cat and 3" to 3 1/2" Kaki exhaust.

Yeah look @ people like Paul who are making ~420rwkw on stock manifolds, E85, 2.8l and 23-25psi

Pretty big difference.

Im almost the same power for boost as you on PULP, also have a junk exhaust atm.

Yeah look @ people like Paul who are making ~420rwkw on stock manifolds, E85, 2.8l and 23-25psi

Pretty big difference.

Im almost the same power for boost as you on PULP, also have a junk exhaust atm.

Yea well Paul has a full twin 3 inch so his is ideal!

i think the 2.8L and twin 3inch exhausts from turbo would make a fair difference.

i dont think i'd get close to that power on a 2.6L even with a 3in from the turbo back.

Stock manifolds are not the issue here. Enough of us flow over 400rwkw with them.

I'd put new type A tomei springs in and see how you go.

I want to earn what you are! You can put Supertech ones in there considering Supertech make them for Tomei, no JDM tax.

Edited by bigmikespec

My thought ref the dyno graphs. The boost on the 25 psi run looks a lot like you have valve float. Look at the peaks of the boost line vs the peaks of the power line. They don't line up. It is making more power when the boost is lower on each fluctuation and less power when the boost is higher.

I still have never seen this.

I have seen more boost, same power and same RPM ceiling. I have also seen engines with "good springs" that make good power to 9000rpm.... at 36psi boost

Then change the springs, same power curve but 80 more rwhp on the same boost pressure.........

Maybe on a NA LS engine they may do "funny" things in the top end...... never on an rb.

You haven't tuned enough ba xr6t's have you. They run conical springs which is good for fuel economy but not for holding a valve on it's seat when the revs and exh back pressure are high. What you see is a massive dip in power at the reonant point of the spring and then the power comes back towards the rev limit.

But Ive also seen what you've seen in regards to swapping springs in and making more power even when the only symptom is slightly low power.

The interesting thing on the low boost graph is that the power falls away high in the rev range suggesting that springs are possibly not up to the task. Bangs some springs in and stabilize your boost and I think you'll be on the right path.

You haven't tuned enough ba xr6t's have you. They run conical springs which is good for fuel economy but not for holding a valve on it's seat when the revs and exh back pressure are high. What you see is a massive dip in power at the reonant point of the spring and then the power comes back towards the rev limit.

This is true, I have tuned many an XR6 turbo. Did 2 last week actually. I wont normally touch them without putting springs in them first.

My thought ref the dyno graphs. The boost on the 25 psi run looks a lot like you have valve float. Look at the peaks of the boost line vs the peaks of the power line. They don't line up. It is making more power when the boost is lower on each fluctuation and less power when the boost is higher.

Sensors can lag, I had one that lagged massively (had a problem) making my car look like a laggy piece of shit with the boost plot, but the power curve didn't match the boost curve. Oscillations like that could very well have lag attached to them which is why they don't line up.

Most the sensors have response times in the ms range but if it is hooked up funny or has problems I have seen it before.

Edited by Rolls

After looking at your graphs Im not sold its your springs.

Sensor lag is a consideration. Having them closer to the engine is better for speed, but the factory 4 wire sensors that come with old DD dynos are super slow.

A proper 5 wire should be used as they are much faster and more accurate in richer mixtures...... but that's another story so.......

Back to the story at hand......

Looking at your graphs I would say a fair bit of timing has been pulled over 24psi. Following the graphs as the boost comes up, power actually drops.

As the boost comes down power comes back up. I think if you had the boost control sorted, so the timing at full throttle wouldn't be jumping all over the place with boost pressures there would be gains to have.

Its not in the mixtures because they don't follow the same pattern. I wouldn't be pulling your springs just yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...