Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure about the crank but I would assume they are. The block may be different depending if it is a series 2 or 1 r33 block since the 33 S1 didn't have vct the oil galley will be different to the 34 head

Not sure about the crank but I would assume they are. The block may be different depending if it is a series 2 or 1 r33 block since the 33 S1 didn't have vct the oil galley will be different to the 34 head

All Rb25's have vct

The way to find out would be to compare a standard piston with your CP ones . I think the chamber sizes are different R33 R34 DET heads so you would need to buy R34GTt specific pistons to get the static CR right .

Should always measure anyway , cheers A .

all parts are for r33det, only the block and crankshaft is from r34. The CP piston used is SC7305 (which has 9:1CR 86.5mm). The compression height for for the 9:1CR and 8.5:1CR is the same.

"CP Pistons said that the valve reliefs are the same for both the 8.5 and 9.0 pistons. They say they design the pistons to accept high lift and +1.0mm oversized valves."

If the above is true, than r34 block or crankshaft is different to r33. Has anyone done this before (ie using r34 block/crankshaft and everything else are to suit r33)?

Will measure the stock piston.

I know for sure that r34 and r33 pistons are different (different in compression height.

Can you take a picture of how far it protrudes above the deck and post it on here?

all parts are for r33det, only the block and crankshaft is from r34. The CP piston used is SC7305 (which has 9:1CR 86.5mm). The compression height for for the 9:1CR and 8.5:1CR is the same.

"CP Pistons said that the valve reliefs are the same for both the 8.5 and 9.0 pistons. They say they design the pistons to accept high lift and +1.0mm oversized valves."

If the above is true, than r34 block or crankshaft is different to r33. Has anyone done this before (ie using r34 block/crankshaft and everything else are to suit r33)?

Will measure the stock piston.

I know for sure that r34 and r33 pistons are different (different in compression height.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
    • But again, the engineers said your cast aluminium would be fine based on the load that would be stretching that section. Same load stretching the bolts in a flex (not the twist), with a much smaller cross sectional area than the original part you've broken. It's why you'd need to be using higher strength bolts, but that's just making up for the strength you lose with less area...
×
×
  • Create New...