Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As a tuner, I prefer not to use it. It's too unreliable and a lot of people tack it on without any safeties. When the kit fails, you get a massive amount of detonation which is more than enough to destroy a motor. I have seen cars come in with clogged nozzles. How long they have been beating on them - you have no idea. It could throw a rod on the first dyno ramp. Once again, no idea. A lot of these people also have zero motivation to service the WMI kit - cleaning nozzles, testing them etc. 

If you insist on using it, I suggest these as a minimum:

- Aftermarket ECU with proper safeties set up
- A FLOW meter, not a pressure sensor wired to the ECU and protections set up. no flow = no boost and timing. 
- Decent lines and pump
- A proper solenoid nozzle that supports PWM and has a very good spray pattern

Tuning will cost a fair bit more but it will save your engine. 

3 hours ago, The Mafia said:

As a tuner, I prefer not to use it. It's too unreliable and a lot of people tack it on without any safeties. When the kit fails, you get a massive amount of detonation which is more than enough to destroy a motor. I have seen cars come in with clogged nozzles. How long they have been beating on them - you have no idea. It could throw a rod on the first dyno ramp. Once again, no idea. A lot of these people also have zero motivation to service the WMI kit - cleaning nozzles, testing them etc. 

If you insist on using it, I suggest these as a minimum:

- Aftermarket ECU with proper safeties set up
- A FLOW meter, not a pressure sensor wired to the ECU and protections set up. no flow = no boost and timing. 
- Decent lines and pump
- A proper solenoid nozzle that supports PWM and has a very good spray pattern

Tuning will cost a fair bit more but it will save your engine. 

Basically everything you described + the annoyance of keeping all of that stuff working is bad enough that as much as I'm in love with the idea I can't bring myself to actually do it.

40 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Basically everything you described + the annoyance of keeping all of that stuff working is bad enough that as much as I'm in love with the idea I can't bring myself to actually do it.

E85 is so much better. Even in E40 form. It's shame that you don't have access to it. 

A water meth kit can be made reliable but it takes a few sensors and a decent ECU like the Link G4x. 

23 minutes ago, The Mafia said:

E85 is so much better. Even in E40 form. It's shame that you don't have access to it. 

A water meth kit can be made reliable but it takes a few sensors and a decent ECU like the Link G4x. 

I have E85 locally, the US loves subsidizing corn and corn ethanol. Also we've banned basically every other octane booster at this point so ethanol is the only thing that you can get for a reasonable price. I plan on doing flex fuel eventually.

If you have E85 available at the pump, that would be my go to option. If you don't, like us in Canada then WMI becomes very interesting and is safe to use with proper integration and safeties setup. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...