Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Just hoping for some input. We are currently doing a RB26/30 conversion for my BNR34 and we didn't want to run a sump adaptor so an extra piece was welded on and machined flat. Has anyone done this conversion or know anyone who has?

Looking for some input, will it work? Or will I run in to more problems? Cheers! Pictures below:

Before welded:

Before%20Weld.JPG

After welded:

One%20Side%20Welded.JPG

Both Sides welded:

Both%20Sides%20Welded.JPG

Machined:

Machined.JPG

Edited by destrukshn
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396893-bnr34-rb2630-conversion/
Share on other sites

Good luck with that! I have a steel sump adapter but will be interested to know if yours works out. Can't you just bolt the sump on without a gasket to see how it looks?

What's the plan at each end?

It is not a problem of fitting the sump, it will fit the sump as it was already put on and those pieces were cut to fit the RB26 sump. We just need to tap the holes.

It's about the strength, will it crack? Just curious to see if anyone else has attempted this modification to avoid a sump adaptor?

  • Like 1

did you weld the top too for strength, I would also try and weld some tabs on top to help.

The idea is good but you are trying to weld to cast, was something I thought of doing but was advised against and brought the platinum adapter instead, so am very interested how this turns out

did you weld the top too for strength, I would also try and weld some tabs on top to help.

The idea is good but you are trying to weld to cast, was something I thought of doing but was advised against and brought the platinum adapter instead, so am very interested how this turns out

Well it was welded both on top and the bottom for strength. Yeah i was told that youre trying weld on to cast it is hard but apparently with the right welding tools you should be able to do it. We'll see if it is strong enough! :)

Whats the plan for the oil pickup, its tight enough with an adapter plate

Oilpickup? It will use the same spot as the RB26 dipstick. :)

Edited by destrukshn

I would have thought the only approach to do this would have been to build up the sides of the block gradually, so that discimilar metal thermal expansion variations are minimised. Thereby minimising the creation of stresses in the added material. It would have to be oven heated to do the welding to do this as well.

It doesn't look like there is a taper on the mild steel plate where it was welded to the block too. A thicker fillet weld between the block and the plate will increase the chances of this working if you couldn't get the metalurgy 100% correct. Welding it with a lot of current/heat to get complete penetration into the join might complete the weld, but it creates stresses all through the cast and added materials.

Weather it holds up is anyone's guess. You won't know till you try it.

what material is the extra piece?

What material weld was it?

If neither are cast iron it won't work

How was it welded?

If an oven was not used then it will crack and split

Though A for effort and trying something different

Not too sure of the exact material, but i am guessing it was some sort of steel.

Well it has been machined and hasnt cracked yet so it looks a bit promising. As it retains a few original holes on the RB30 from the RB26 Sump, will tap out using larger studs to ensure it doesn't move.

Whats the reason for not using an adaptor plate? Sounds like an awful lot of effort for something that would worth with a plate?

Well the reason for not using it was probably due to extra 10mm which person working on it didnt want for sump adaptor. Possible oil peaks too.. Well cutting was done in house, welding was done free & machining was done free. We'll see if it works otherwise if it cracks, can always take motor out and fix it! :)

I would have thought the only approach to do this would have been to build up the sides of the block gradually, so that discimilar metal thermal expansion variations are minimised. Thereby minimising the creation of stresses in the added material. It would have to be oven heated to do the welding to do this as well.

It doesn't look like there is a taper on the mild steel plate where it was welded to the block too. A thicker fillet weld between the block and the plate will increase the chances of this working if you couldn't get the metalurgy 100% correct. Welding it with a lot of current/heat to get complete penetration into the join might complete the weld, but it creates stresses all through the cast and added materials.

Weather it holds up is anyone's guess. You won't know till you try it.

Haha yeah guess we'll just have to wait and see once it is done and if it holds up! Thanks for the input!

  • 2 weeks later...

I like it! Nearly looks like an RB26.

The only suggestion I'd make would make would be to haven an align bore done on the mains. Shave 1 thou off your cradle, install your main studs, and then re-align bore the main bearing saddles to make sure everything is straight. Then do the rest of your block machining.

I like it! Nearly looks like an RB26.

The only suggestion I'd make would make would be to haven an align bore done on the mains. Shave 1 thou off your cradle, install your main studs, and then re-align bore the main bearing saddles to make sure everything is straight. Then do the rest of your block machining.

It does look like an RB26 indeed, just letting everyone know the welds are so hard that our drill is having problems drilling the holes and it is getting done by someone external and not in-house!

There is no reason to align bore done on the mains. There is nothing wrong with the mains and so there is no need to realign them. It is factory aligned.

heat from welding may have distorted the block, so if there is the slightest twist then the tunnel may not be in line, which is why a line bore/ hone is done, if it is not, and the alignment is out then the crank may rotate at an awkward angle and force it to flex and vibrate, and or seize

material hardness effecting the drilling... to make it easier get a drill bit guage and then sharpen the drill head to match the angle recommended for the material your drilling into

heat from welding may have distorted the block, so if there is the slightest twist then the tunnel may not be in line, which is why a line bore/ hone is done, if it is not, and the alignment is out then the crank may rotate at an awkward angle and force it to flex and vibrate, and or seize

material hardness effecting the drilling... to make it easier get a drill bit guage and then sharpen the drill head to match the angle recommended for the material your drilling into

Heating was only done on the top of the block, the whole block wasnt heated just to weld the sump extension pieces on and so there is no twist in the tunnel. It is definitely aligned. Work is done by professionals and there is no need to worry about it being out of alignment, but thanks for the input :)

The holes are drilled now, will update with pictures once short motor has been assembled!

You are crazy... as if you would not go through the trouble just to be 100% sure. I know plenty of "professionals".

+1

I've not measured a standard block and seen all the mains measure up the same, let alone a welded one. For the extra few hundred dollars its worth the piece of mind. Personally I hate the idea of pulling an engine out of a car to fix something I could have done better if I'd just paid a tiny bit more.

While you might 'get away' with it in a lowish power situation combined with big 2.8+ thou clearences, why would you set an engine up like that if you can do better. Especially in a GTR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...