Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

not really but hey that test is only a guide to what you really might be i think im only 102 IRL i took that test twice and basically came up with the 112 i took it again today changing some of the anwsers i wasnt sure on and got 117 so its not that accurate

lol serious, i got this first time, im not that smart either:

11.gif

Edited by nisskid

got a wave from a white 34 GTR at NE Road / Lower Portrush Road intersection about 7pm New Years Eve, and on my way home about 1am followed TYPE M along Portrush Rd near the Glen Osmond end for about 3 or 4 minutes

got a wave from a white 34 GTR at NE Road / Lower Portrush Road intersection about 7pm New Years Eve, and on my way home about 1am followed TYPE M along Portrush Rd near the Glen Osmond end for about 3 or 4 minutes

That would be me in the GTR.

Does SLO-032 have Doriteks and a FMIC on it? If so I spotted it on Portrush Road today.

Also saw a tough S1 R33 GTS-t painted yellow with big DriftRs on it - sounds tough as. I want to make love to its exhaust.

Followed a nice silver R33 sedan with big rims yesterday along Grenfell Road, Redwood Park.

Does SLO-032 have Doriteks and a FMIC on it? If so I spotted it on Portrush Road today.

Also saw a tough S1 R33 GTS-t painted yellow with big DriftRs on it - sounds tough as. I want to make love to its exhaust.

Followed a nice silver R33 sedan with big rims yesterday along Grenfell Road, Redwood Park.

Silver or grey that would be sunday wot time was it if it was silver prolly guy or his misses as i didnt notice any skylines following me

spotted a maroon 33 in the car wash at the bp on port rush rd at payneham...some girl washing it....

BUHAHAHAHAH!. i wish i was there.

This might be a first but i spotted Vange on hindley st :)

same, parked outside the petrol station. he had gone to pickup a few steecharies no doubt.

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t
Saw a orange R32, beautiful as at the video store near my place in valley view. look lik a car i have seen on here. Flick or something?
Did you notice any front quarter panel damage? cos apparently some blind B!#@* reversed into it, if it was Flick's. :)
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...