Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

spotted: blue vk? wit white rims, the one from the drift comps going up brighton rd yesterday arvo. i heard they spend big $$$ (8 or 900) on a handbreak for the comps. (put on a good show....for a commonwhore )

did ne1 here go on the boosted cruize on sat night? there was a very nice dark purple r32 gts-t that i havent seen b4....loved that colour, sounded nice. would b interested 2 know what mods it had?

blue? yea maybe....kinda looked like the gtr purple to me (love that colour), but i didnt see it under light, just a quick glimps while trying to keep my poor sick(missing) car straight! (wet weather makes for some interesting driving!) souded like it had a bit of power tho....

HA HA A:bahaha:........I Reiceived a letter from VICROADS saying that people find my number plates offensive and that they promote poor driving. They have asked me nicely if i would concider changing my plates for free. Hey dean do you have a scanner so i can put this letter on the forum???! Any ideas for my new plates anyone? Oh and while iam on the subject my plates where ment to be COP Y ME not COPYME.

Why do you have VIC plates? But yeah, that's pretty funny. Buy a scanner.

Oh, and COPY ME is better than COP Y ME, IMO.

Moo_r32, did that purple looking 32 have a gtr kit on it, if its the one im thinking of it used to belong to a mate of mine, supposed to be a 400hp car (so ive been told) I know its got gtr intercooler, exhaust, big turbo (dont know what but its heaps laggy) custom exhaust maniflod and external wastegate, had extra injectors and ran 18psi or something, i think it used to have bbs rims on it. did it have bb licence plates?

Moo_r32, did that purple looking 32 have a gtr kit on it, if its the one im thinking of it used to belong to a mate of mine, supposed to be a 400hp car (so ive been told) I know its got gtr intercooler,  exhaust,  big turbo (dont know what but its heaps laggy) custom exhaust maniflod and external wastegate, had extra injectors and ran 18psi or something, i think it used to have bbs rims on it.  did it have bb licence plates?

I spoke to the owner (or formaer owner a while back), it had a Apex'i turbo, smallish trust intercooler (still in stock location) extra injector etc. I had a chat to him when it was for sale, as I thought it was a GTR. He told me it was making 185rwkw at 18 psi boost

Sounds like its had a few changes since if its the same car

Nice looking car

Dude don't attack me on the net, you don't know me!

AND how i drive my car is up to me, is it not?

Well considering there was no other car on the street except yours and mine. It was late and u decided to rev it up and launch it right next to me, im pretty sure that my guess of you showing off was true.

But dont worry, next time i see you and I dont have a passenger, ill chase you down and do it personally.

Morale of this story, if you wanna show off, go look for some other freak to do it to.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...