Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What he will be doing is changing gears a lot more, he has a big power band and a mountain of torque which means he can easily drive the "wrong " gear, been able to hold gears is easier and faster, with that much power you want taller gears to help settle the car and make less rail happy out of corners

And when driving the car on the freeway it will be reving higher then it needs to and this is a street car first and formost

He has already complained that he has still been caught in the wrong gear at times

And it a lot cheaper to throw the box in and say nope they are to short, then it is the change the lot and say f**k shoulda left the diff alone

Farken 4 PPG boxes, my rajab. The helical dog 1-4? How much grunt, Dave?

The problem with aftermarket gear sets is the size of the gearbox casing is the limiting factor for gear strength. If you can't make the gears physically bigger and space them further apart there are limitations on stength. Gear design, material and heat treatment can be optimised but only to a point.

The most cost effective option is the new Quaife sequential for the GTR, totally new design and much improved in comparison to their original GTR sequential which is a modified Dodge Viper Quaife sequential. I think they are around the $9k English pound... group buy? :)

The problem with aftermarket gear sets is the size of the gearbox casing is the limiting factor for gear strength. If you can't make the gears physically bigger and space them further apart there are limitations on stength. Gear design, material and heat treatment can be optimised but only to a point.

The most cost effective option is the new Quaife sequential for the GTR, totally new design and much improved in comparison to their original GTR sequential which is a modified Dodge Viper Quaife sequential. I think they are around the $9k English pound... group buy? :)

Only rated to 750 HP though which is a bit of a bitch. Looking at the ratios, they do look pretty neat.

I just got a quote back from Marcus and he said $12,700 for the OS88. Thing is, there is $2k give or take with GST and Duty. They do say 5,000 kms of "race/track kms" before it needs to be inspected. I'd say that would be no let off and yank on the stick. There is nothing stopping you from clutching in and pulling the lever.

Bob posted a quick video of his OS88 last night on Facebook. Seemed pretty stout.

It doesn't matter which way, it's not going to be cheap for a solution that's gonna be tough enough.

Paul.....I think the best thing to do before you commit to anything is do a spreadsheet comparing all of the relevant transmissions available by type, cost of acquisition, Max HP, gear ratios options (inc extra costs for this where applicable) and ongoing maintenance / servicing costs at the recommended servicing intervals and then make you're assessment.

My two cents worth

  • Like 1

Paul.....I think the best thing to do before you commit to anything is do a spreadsheet comparing all of the relevant transmissions available by type, cost of acquisition, Max HP, gear ratios options (inc extra costs for this where applicable) and ongoing maintenance / servicing costs at the recommended servicing intervals and then make you're assessment.

My two cents worth

That's not a bad idea.

I'll type something up and post it in here.

Might be useful for other guys also.

  • Like 1

The wait time really isn't an issue. I've just bought a house so it won't be ordered next week!

Taken from another thread on here;

Quote

The original Quaife H-gate 6 speed was developed back in 1991 for Trust (aka GReddy) Japan. In those days the primary objective was to get an extra gear, with two overdrives (5th and 6th) so the top speed trialers could make 300kmh. It was never really designed for lots of extra strength. When you fit a new cluster of gears into any stock gear casing, you cant alter the diameter of the gears because the shaft positions cant change. So all you can do is improve the tooth design and possibly the width of the gears. All that was done as that product evolved during the '90s. Thing is though, by then most serious cars were making 750hp or more so the gears would eventually fail - due to their stock diameter. It was obvious something more serious was needed. The sequential is a completely different thing altogether and is completely different internally to the older H gate kit. Its a direct derivative of Quaifes universal 6-speed sequential, an entirely different product altogether. It was re-designed in fact to fit a new car specific 32/33 GTR casing, I know cos I lent them my car to model it on. The sequential has enormous gears by comparison to the H. I think there are about 65 sequential boxes around the world now and remarkably few spares have been supplied during the 11 years they have been out there. Spares are generally available at the moment, whereas for the older H-pattern, none have been made since 2001, so spares if not on the shelf have to be made to order, meaning much longer lead times. I think the most important thing to remember about the sequential, is its a racing transmission. It uses straight cut gears and is as noisy as you like. Not the preferred option for a daily driver really, but lets face it, there arent too many options available for the GTR. What I really wanted to do here was just answer the heresay and explain the product. The same basic principle goes for anything on the market - if the gear diameter is the same as standard, the strength is ultimately limited by that factor alone, so watch yourself spending fortunes on anything that fits into the standard casing.

The Getrag really intrigues me, so little info out there,but if you want to fit one of those in a 32/33, will need a 34 transfer and 34 gear ratios in the front and back axles, because all the ratios are completely different. As the 34 had a dual mass flywheel (as do Supras,M5's and 911 turbos), when you switch to a twin or triple with a solid flywheel, it seems to put alot of pressure on the constant meshing gears, or input driven pair as they are known. Whether these ultimately fail or just get noisier and noisier I really dont know. Getrags seem to manage 700hp quite successfully in the 34, Supra and others, so I assume it has bigger gears than the 32/33- Anyone care to comment on that ? The Quaife sequential is noisy in all gears however, as all of them are straight cut. As far as using it goes, you will either love it or hate it. It needs you to shift definitely and aggressively, mainly due to a mixture of the large gear diameter and the sequential mechanism being mounted on the side of the box. Treat it like a motorcycle gearbox, pushing it hard into gear, and you will get on with it just fine. Press it delicately and it probably wont engage the next gear up or down. What did Richard Bell say out of interest ? He hated his initially whereas Brian loved it. I sat next to Rich at that drift place in Wales and made him have a go with it properly, by about the 3rd lap he loved it. So much so that after two more sessions, he broke his lovely new engine !

Anyway, hope it was ok to post, just thought a bit of background might help

cheers, Tim

That's is another point, the quaife is straight cut noisy and the OS88 is helical cut so not as noisy

Paul.....I think the best thing to do before you commit to anything is do a spreadsheet comparing all of the relevant transmissions available by type, cost of acquisition, Max HP, gear ratios options (inc extra costs for this where applicable) and ongoing maintenance / servicing costs at the recommended servicing intervals and then make you're assessment.My two cents worth

Well said :)

My mechanic had a couple of runs off the limiter (8K) and it bogged (2.1 & 2.2 60').

I went off 6-6.5K and managed a 1.85 and 1.75 60'. This is with 275/35/19 Kumho Ecsta's and twin plate DCS clutch. I'm thinking the rubber is too big.

Tried two-step on the street and it bogged also. Stock engine so I took the two-step off.

Have you ordered the OS88 yet? :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...