Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am currently tossing up between 2 versions of the GT2871r for an rb25.

I'm looking for a responsive 250-270kw with decent top end.

The first is the GT2871r 0.64 52 trim (AKA GT-RS).

The second is the GT2871r 0.86 56 trim.

I will be replacing the rear housing with either an OP6 or standard r33 rear housing so it bolts into the stock location.

Intake piping will be modified to suit.

My question is this, which version of the 2871r would be more appropriate and is the OP6 housing worth it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397760-gt2871r-advice/
Share on other sites

Daniel, are you able to pass me a link to the 3071r with sonic housing as I cant find it? (Also, how big is this housing)

The GT3071r internally gated was my other option and it seems as this will be the way to go.

Originally i was after the 0.64 rear housing but I have heard this smaller housing has trouble with boost control.

Because of this, I'll be looking into the standard 0.86 rear housing.

With regards to fitment, I am unsure about a few things regarding the 3071 and I cant find a clear answer.

All I need is for it to bolt onto the stock manifold and dump (oil/water lines will be sorted and custom intake piping will be made).

What is needed to make this possible (i.e. from manifold to turbo & from turbo to dump)

Thanks for the replies guys, I appreciate the help.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397760-gt2871r-advice/#findComment-6315181
Share on other sites

http://www.sonicperformance.com.au/739548_dash_RB20_dash_25/Nissan-RB20_or_25-Ball-Bearing-Upgrade/pd.php

That's about all I can find on the Sonic website as far as what's got a housing but we have done quite a few upgrades now with really good results. Genuine Garrett turbo and the housing fitted is a 0.75 A/R. It can be fitted to anything from a T28 up to a GT3076R.

Then you can have the standard RB25 comp cover machined to suit the front so it's a direct bolt on arrangement but we always pick a size larger when we do this because the smaller comp cover does effect airflow a little bit.

All the standard piping, dump and manifold all fits back up to the original place.

One of those would get you 260rwkw and is complete bolt on except for the water line around the back of the head needs to be cut to suit the line kit you get

Then there is option B which is to leave the 3071 comp cover on it and do your pipework as planned. I think the last one we did was 275rwkw at 18psi but may have been 16psi I cannot remember right now

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397760-gt2871r-advice/#findComment-6315407
Share on other sites

Sonic housing? R U serious?

I can recall quite a few threads where we have specifically weened people off the sonic housings, and even made them return it in place of a genuine Garrett at a massive cost.

Why is it you are recommending that product all of a sudden?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397760-gt2871r-advice/#findComment-6315947
Share on other sites

Sonic housing? R U serious?

I can recall quite a few threads where we have specifically weened people off the sonic housings, and even made them return it in place of a genuine Garrett at a massive cost.

Why is it you are recommending that product all of a sudden?

Not sure why you would be weening people off them. They have a purpose and that's to make a Garrett turbo a direct bolt on. They will not flow as much as the housing that comes with the turbo unless its the 28 series. That's why a 3071 is suggested. It will provide very similar, if not the same, response and make the power he wants.

The only turbo that under-performed on a sonic housing for us was the large GT3076R. It only did 275rwkw at 16psi and more boost just made it ping.

We did a GT2860RS on an RB20 and it had identical response to the factory turbo and at 200rwkw on moderate boost, it also was a good performer.

I have fitted dozens without a single issue but anyone trying to get good power (280rwkw +) should be considering other options anyway. Too many people want to eat cake these days

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397760-gt2871r-advice/#findComment-6315958
Share on other sites

Not sure why you would be weening people off them. They have a purpose and that's to make a Garrett turbo a direct bolt on. They will not flow as much as the housing that comes with the turbo unless its the 28 series. That's why a 3071 is suggested. It will provide very similar, if not the same, response and make the power he wants.

The only turbo that under-performed on a sonic housing for us was the large GT3076R. It only did 275rwkw at 16psi and more boost just made it ping.

We did a GT2860RS on an RB20 and it had identical response to the factory turbo and at 200rwkw on moderate boost, it also was a good performer.

I have fitted dozens without a single issue but anyone trying to get good power (280rwkw +) should be considering other options anyway. Too many people want to eat cake these days

Fair enough. Its good that you put it out there re what they are good for.

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397760-gt2871r-advice/#findComment-6316359
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...