Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pressure between lift pump and surge tank would be low - less than 3psi I would think. Depends on hose length and diameter.

I think you would be better off using a single fluid sensor/switch. We use a capacitance style switch that changes state if the fluid doesn't surround the sensor. Can't remember who makes it - some German company.

Also I wouldn't ever map effective fuel pump duty vs tps on a turocharged car especially on a non positive displacement pump. Really need to map pump duty vs manifold pressure.

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I am not sure where the experience of empty surge tanks killing engines comes from...to me it sounds a like a bit of an internet myth.

I have run the race car out of fuel a twice during races- surge tank empties, car coughs in corner, driver backs off. I have also had a fuel pump fail (came loose in tank tearing wiring off after a rally crash). In 3 cases, even though it has happened to me at full throttle and very hot motor each time, it has not resulted in any damage.

The fact is, it is vey unlikely that a car will fire with insufficient fuel pressure. You need approx 7:1 to 20:1 for a cylinder to fire. If you drop to 50% or less of the expected pressure, you can almost guarantee a missfire, not a lean out. And even in a cylinder or 2 fires lean once or twice, there is no way it will keep firing at that level, it will almost instantly start missifirng.

I run Paul's Engine Monitor too, and that is defiantely your answer. Just set a warning on low fuel pressure. That way not matter whether it is the main pump, lift pump, main tank, surge tank or even regulator that fails, you will be warned.

actually, on second thoughts I have run out of fuel 3 times. Happened at an enduro at Oran Park years ago too.

Same thing....it coughed coming off the bridge, I backed off and drove into the pits swearing.

No engine damage

Pressure between lift pump and surge tank would be low - less than 3psi I would think. Depends on hose length and diameter.

I think you would be better off using a single fluid sensor/switch. We use a capacitance style switch that changes state if the fluid doesn't surround the sensor. Can't remember who makes it - some German company.

Also I wouldn't ever map effective fuel pump duty vs tps on a turocharged car especially on a non positive displacement pump. Really need to map pump duty vs manifold pressure.

Firstly, the fuel pump duty wont be based on TPS posistion. I should have furthered what i was trying to say. I'm using a fuel lab pump. It has a voltage input for speed control or you can use a PWM to control it. I'm using the voltage input to control it. Under 2.5V to the input, the pump runs low duty, above 2.5V the pump runs at full duty. I'm simply pulling the 0-5V off the TPS and feeding it into the signal input on the pump. So at around 40-50% TPS the pump will then change over to full duty.

Yes a capacitance sensor would be very good, however, seeing that my surge tank is already made, this would be hard to fit as i have no way of accessing the inside of the tank.

The length from the lift pump to the surge tank is about 1 metre of 5/16" fuel line with a Ryco fuel filter in this line.

I am not sure where the experience of empty surge tanks killing engines comes from...to me it sounds a like a bit of an internet myth.

I have run the race car out of fuel a twice during races- surge tank empties, car coughs in corner, driver backs off. I have also had a fuel pump fail (came loose in tank tearing wiring off after a rally crash). In 3 cases, even though it has happened to me at full throttle and very hot motor each time, it has not resulted in any damage.

The fact is, it is vey unlikely that a car will fire with insufficient fuel pressure. You need approx 7:1 to 20:1 for a cylinder to fire. If you drop to 50% or less of the expected pressure, you can almost guarantee a missfire, not a lean out. And even in a cylinder or 2 fires lean once or twice, there is no way it will keep firing at that level, it will almost instantly start missifirng.

I run Paul's Engine Monitor too, and that is defiantely your answer. Just set a warning on low fuel pressure. That way not matter whether it is the main pump, lift pump, main tank, surge tank or even regulator that fails, you will be warned.

Yes, theory would say the engine would just cut out when it runs out of fuel. Simon a friend of mine who had this issue said that his lift pump failed, BUT the two 044's he had created enough suction to actually draw fuel from the main tank into the surge tank and allow the engine to run. But surging and lean out occurred.

Put an fpr in the line just before the surge tank so only that part of the line will be pressurised (not the surge tank). Adapt an oil pressure warning light switch and T it in before the fpr. You can have a buzzer or light on your dash. When your tank is running low the buzzer will come on and off (as petrol surges away fom the pickup) and when its buzzing continuously you will know you are down to the 3L in your surge tank.

I am not sure where the experience of empty surge tanks killing engines comes from...to me it sounds a like a bit of an internet myth.

I have run the race car out of fuel a twice during races- surge tank empties, car coughs in corner, driver backs off. I have also had a fuel pump fail (came loose in tank tearing wiring off after a rally crash). In 3 cases, even though it has happened to me at full throttle and very hot motor each time, it has not resulted in any damage.

The fact is, it is vey unlikely that a car will fire with insufficient fuel pressure. You need approx 7:1 to 20:1 for a cylinder to fire. If you drop to 50% or less of the expected pressure, you can almost guarantee a missfire, not a lean out. And even in a cylinder or 2 fires lean once or twice, there is no way it will keep firing at that level, it will almost instantly start missifirng.

I run Paul's Engine Monitor too, and that is defiantely your answer. Just set a warning on low fuel pressure. That way not matter whether it is the main pump, lift pump, main tank, surge tank or even regulator that fails, you will be warned.

This, if your lift pump dies, as soon as you use up whats in the surge tank your engine will simply cough then die. Sure, it might run lean for a split second but no where near long enough to kill it. As for the main pump drawing fuel from the tank, thats simply not possible with a conventional surge tank setup (as in a recirculating setup, with an overflow back to the main tank) as even if they managed to create enough suction they'd simply suck air from the return, not fuel through the dead pump. The only time its possible for a lift pump to kill your motor is if it flows the exact amount needed to create a lean out without going lean enough to miss and even then you'd have to be on WOT for a long time to drain the surge tank whilst its still being partially refilled.

as kitto said... i melted 2 pistons as a result of leaning out with a dead pump... certainly didnt cough and die.. didnt even know it had happened. the two 044's continued to suck fuel thro the lift pump and full tank. all the signs of leaning out were there tho. engine ran hotter, overheating issues etc.

as kitto said... i melted 2 pistons as a result of leaning out with a dead pump... certainly didnt cough and die.. didnt even know it had happened. the two 044's continued to suck fuel thro the lift pump and full tank. all the signs of leaning out were there tho. engine ran hotter, overheating issues etc.

weird. how was the surge tank plumbed?

as kitto said... i melted 2 pistons as a result of leaning out with a dead pump... certainly didnt cough and die.. didnt even know it had happened. the two 044's continued to suck fuel thro the lift pump and full tank. all the signs of leaning out were there tho. engine ran hotter, overheating issues etc.

How full was your fuel tank when this happened?

about 3/4 full

The short fuel return tube that is in the tank may have been sucking a good amount of air bubbles in along with the fuel whan it surges around the tank, causing your 044's to cavitate and lose a lot of pressure.

That would have lead to a lean out condition for sure.

If the tank was a bit lower on fuel the suction would never have happened and the surge tank would have just run out of fuel.

either way. the lift pump died and i had no way of knowing about it.

will be wiring a fuel pressure sensor into the reg and wiring into the haltech to monitor it in future.

Simon, do you believe that monitoring just the rail pressure is ok? Or should we also be trying to monitor how much fuel is in the surge tank and/or if the lift pump has failed?

monitoring rail pressure is the best way, as it covers everything except injectors failing. a surge tank level monitor wont cover the main pump dying.

No it wont, but if you monitor both then you've got both avenues covered. I plan on having the Engine Monitior monitor fuel rail pressure vs boost pressure and i just thought it would be a good idea to keep an eye on the surge tank.

Pointless if you have a pressure monitor. If the intank does die your motors not going to instantly blow into oblivion the second fuel pressure drops 5psi. Even if you somehow managed to empty the surge tank at the same time as being on WOT at 7000rpm your pressure monitor will stop you well before you kill the motor.

Edit: Also, I'm not sure what happened in Simons case but i've had my intank stop pumping several times (due to blocked filters, bad wiring etc) and every time the tank simply empties and the car misses then dies, the first sign is actually the 044 cavitating, you can hear it even with the windows up and music playing. It'd be cool to have a level monitor for it but it's just not needed.

Edited by JonnoHR31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...