Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've seen alot of 350z and G35 owners and others do the VK56 swap and it's a great engine. My question is can you swap a VK56 into an R34 without replacing the transmission. I don't mean can it handle the power and torque, I mean can the gearbox actually bolt up to the engine. It would be amazing if the VK56 can bolt up to an R34 GT-R and keep the AWD while having the VK56. So what do you think guys can this be done...?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/
Share on other sites

I asked Robbie Ward if a VK56 would fit in a skyline and he said that it would be to wide and wont fit easily in GTR engine bay. He has one for his new rail car and said these are massive compared to a LS1

Edited by WHITER33GTS-T
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-6333488
Share on other sites

yh haha I think I underthought this idea haha if anyone can do it Robbie can. I just thought it was a good idea since I've seen these engines being thrown at everything and they're good engines. i think the front diff thing would pretty much kill this idea would it not?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-6334200
Share on other sites

Anything you aim to do with 2.6lt can be more easily achieved, be more reliable, and will be less stressed overall when its done with more displacement.

Just just think how much fun a twin turbo VK56 would be.... or stoke it to 6lt first :yes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-6334493
Share on other sites

Anything you aim to do with 2.6lt can be more easily achieved, be more reliable, and will be less stressed overall when its done with more displacement.

Not for the money.

Spend $30k shoehorning a VK56 into a GTR and you'll have a bog stock VK56 in a GTR. Spend $30k building up an RB26 and you'll smash the living shit out of your stock VK56 engined R34.

Not to mention the aftermarket support for RBs is probably 100 times larger than that of a VK. Sure, when money is no object, go nutso. I'd do some crazy conversions if I had millions, but just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-6334532
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Vk56 at its widest point is 26.5"

these only came out with an auto behind them

There is also the reluctor wheel mounted to the flex plate

there is an adapter plate and clutch kit available off the shelf to match a 370z manual

there is also the height, custom manifold defiantly will be needed

there is also the sump which holds oil vertically at the rear of motor, instead of the horizontal like the RBs (this was to fit the front diff in front of it so it would fit in the Nissan titans

On top of that, not much room for the turbos

they also came out at 9.8:1 (some with corn based eflex)

2007+ = cvct

timing chain also has been known to jump at high revs

US guys claim 17mile/gallon with their n/a

Ecu? 370z use same computer

pistons Google gtm

cams Google Jim wolf technology (s2/s7 s2vct s8 or s8vct most popular

(costs

2k long motor

1k 370z box

1,200 adapter plate

1,200 flywheel/ clutch kit

1,500 cams

300 springs

2-3k importing costs

1,200 pistons

6k stillen supercharger kit

then once here 5k+ fabrication

End result probably around 450-500hp

edit;

Just noticed the dates, sorry for mega post bump lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-6904839
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Mega bump and my first post in maybe 5 years but yeah Robbie Ward is right, they are wide as hell being twin cam and all, but they do fit. Google Ian Fournier.

I've got a high comp atmo VK56 in my R32 sedan drift build.

The tightest part was the clearance between the strut towers and the exhaust ports.

Ended up putting in an S14 steering rack for better clearance and getting a custom steering column made to change the angle on the universal to give more room.

Also ditched the brake and clutch masters, running a floor mounted pedal box with remote reservoirs instead. That part isn't essential but I wanted to mount the engine as far back in the engine bay as possible cos racecar.

Custom tunnel etc. Got photos if anyone's curious.

Putting one in an R34 would be fairly similar I would imagine, but forget AWD, if you wanna go big get one of robbies 4wd RB30 long blocks. Be way cheaper in the long run.

Edited by Hillstc
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-7727481
Share on other sites

Needs more power though - 330AWKW is just a rough and ready RB30 or a mildly modified RB26.

Not saying you're wrong, but it is daily driven on unopened motor with fuel supply issues. and an 80's Jap V8 engine to boot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-7727825
Share on other sites

Not saying you're wrong, but it is daily driven on unopened motor with fuel supply issues. and an 80's Jap V8 engine to boot.

I'm not saying 330 awkw is not a decent lot of power but it just seems (in my opinion) a barely adequate return for the huge amount of time and money that has gone into this (well executed) project. And of course it needs a better fuel supply. The owners seem happy with it and that's fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398723-vk56-r34-gt-r/#findComment-7727929
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...