Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i just got my gtt back from unigroup

just want some feedback on how you think the tune looks, i dont have too much knowledge in this area.

I am happy with it though, it pulls like a rocket but the clutch is starting to slip already..

post-69199-0-46562400-1337328412_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400479-gtx3076r-pick-my-tune-apart-please/
Share on other sites

Well, for a standard turbo it looks unbelivably good. For a mid sized GT30 based turbo it looks pretty good. For a pair of T88s, it looks pretty shit.

But with 270rwkW climbing all the way to over 7200 rpm, of course it would feel pretty nice to drive. You should be happy. Unless you do have a pair of T88s on it!

Looks good. Boost takes a while to hit 20psi (from 18psi). Would add a bit more to the midrange if you get it holding better

That said, should have gone a GT3076 if all you were going to run was 20psi. Cheaper and would have had the same result

GTX = 24psi+ to make use of it.

It looks like it would hit 20psi before 3600 with better boost control/wastegate. Is it a .63 rear or .82? Internal gate too i'm guessing?

I guess it could flow 200kw by 4k on e85? I will let you know soon, mine should be here in 2 weeks. :)

assume it is bolted on to standard exhaust manifold internally gated then the result is average on pump 98. You will need to either run an external gate or get a better exhaust manifold to obtain higher top end.

looks like it dips down at 3800rpm , then comes good at 4500 then dips again at 5400rpm

Is that related to how much effort the tuner has put in?? like ignition timing and fuel maps?

Could be, but I doubt it. He mentioned that the clutch is starting to slip, so that's probably the cause of the dip at 3800. Then the shape from there could be caused by anything, like the smoothing software of the dyno or the ECU that's being used.

Edited by Hanaldo

Why is it that unigroup dyno sheets always make things look like they are really responsive?

if you check out the below page, theres a pretty ordinary SR20 with a 3071R doing 200kw @ 4000rpm and 285kw peak which also lookslike its on boost for the entire run. I doubt its THAT great on the road. compare it to the lower graph and its only 200rpm off a T28.

to OP, its a little ordinary.. wants E85 and 25psi boost.

sorry for the lack of info, its 0.63 externally gated

ive only got a 38mm tial with the flange welded on the standard manifold

I couldnt find any good low mount manifolds that were ex gated

boost controller is a hks evc6

it does pull hard but the turbo is making a wierd noise on spool up, not too sure what this is, im not sure if i could be surging, never heard it before

i might have to take it back n get them to have a listen

aww and yeah its on pump 98

and its run off a power fc

Edited by Selleck 34GTT

It looks about right for a 0.63, it should look and feel responsive.

It will be a little limited in the top end but how much time do you spend up there??

Like The Mafia found there is plenty more compressor flow if you use WMI or pineapple juice to control knock.

cant the boost controller make it hit 20psi earlier?? my apexi would make the boost come on fast and hold it, that was with a internal highflow, yours is external so surely that could be improved, or is that because of the 0.63?

maybe its just the large scale used on that print out.

Edited by SliverS2

Yea....Power seems about right for the .63 rear end on a std mani, I got a little more out of one but that was running 95 and wmi (see turbo upgrade dyno thread P42) so 300rwkw is definately doable with wmi and 98. These comps have a lot left in them but the.63 chokes them badly.

As for the noise, cant say ...this one has a screamer :whistling:

The peak power is fine for it on the said boost and .63, no issues there. The midrange IS a little lacking, and you didnt have a crumby tuner do it for you.

Id probably look at getting a .82 and try run more boost if its possible. The GTX turbos arent necessarily going to keep up with a GT variant if at 'sane' boost levels.

Bit off topic, Do the gtx variations only start to show improvements over the regular gt3076 once they are boosted to about 25psi?

If the gtx offers a little bit of extra flow up top compared with regular gt3076, is there much difference in response between the two or are they hitting full boost at practically the same times?

Bit off topic, Do the gtx variations only start to show improvements over the regular gt3076 once they are boosted to about 25psi?

If the gtx offers a little bit of extra flow up top compared with regular gt3076, is there much difference in response between the two or are they hitting full boost at practically the same times?

The GTXs don't seem to be even as good as the GTs until you have at least 23psi or so.

im still not convinced yet, hopefully with more add ons like cams, cam gear, better boost controller and maybe even the tuner, the gtx might do better than that graph. Looks like this result is no better than Micko's GTX3071, be interesting to see both graphs layed over each other.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...