Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

20m further UP the hill.....don't you mean further DOWN the hill? It's already at the top of the crest so you don't have big speed for the jump - or do you mean the chicane just as you exit the canyon?

I mean the 3rd set could have been further up the hill, (the set before the set on top of the hill). Certainly not suggesting any more cones.

When going hard I was in 4th gear between the 3rd and 4th sets of cones, no other section was that long and fast, and considering the nature of the road, it was probably one of the more dangerous areas at high speed.

But this is only a personal opinion and just an area that I felt unsettled the car. The set out of the cones was well done overall.

I rescued 2 parts of 2 runs from the corrupted video files:

1/ it is probably a good idea to make sure there is some coolant in the car before running:

2/ the quick run, but the bloody video is cut off about 2/3 through :mad:

I vote more chicanes! Suits the micra better :P

I agree! It keeps the GT-Rs modest! :P

another boat doing its thing below. Was this supposed to be a time attack grip event?

if so no one told Matt or i...

306221_457873234228213_214501475232058_1995605_41184386_n.jpg

I understeered straight through the last chicane so I had already failed at getting a good time at that point, so I figured I may as well put on a show :P

Good news people; I will be making another booking at Sutton.

Not sure of the date yet of course but don't miss it (there will be at least 2 months notice).

Also we will be more stringent on leaks, so please be mindful of that. There was oil leaks on the start line so anyone with that fix it now

Good news people; I will be making another booking at Sutton.

Not sure of the date yet of course but don't miss it (there will be at least 2 months notice).

Also we will be more stringent on leaks, so please be mindful of that. There was oil leaks on the start line so anyone with that fix it now

Thats not good, thats F**king awesome!!! I am NOT missing the next one!!! :woot:

I understeered straight through the last chicane so I had already failed at getting a good time at that point, so I figured I may as well put on a show :P

Same here, saw Eiji out there and decided to get on the gas a little early as i came out of the two corners after the jump, very very easy way to provoke oversteer i discovered. Almost made up for being so far down the timing sheet, will definitely be back for the next one to see if i can get into the 130's!

Entering the burnout comp again? :woot:

Hahahaa you saw that huh??

Hardly what I'd call an epic burnout..........I fell to the Fatz's peer pressure, he is a bad influence.

I do need to learn how to launch properly, it's never been my strong point.

Hahahaa you saw that huh??

Hardly what I'd call an epic burnout..........I fell to the Fatz's peer pressure, he is a bad influence.

I do need to learn how to launch properly, it's never been my strong point.

Was awesome :D

And don't worry, I couldn't launch mine with a high flow so I got NO chance with the 3037 ;)

i was told to wait till i was at high revs before dropping the clutch before doing my last run, i think i was smoking the rears all the way to the first set of cones..feltgoodman.jpg

Also we will be more stringent on leaks, so please be mindful of that. There was oil leaks on the start line so anyone with that fix it now

well, I surely know who was leaking water, and that won't happen again

i was told to wait till i was at high revs before dropping the clutch before doing my last run, i think i was smoking the rears all the way to the first set of cones..feltgoodman.jpg

That launch was somewhere around 4-5k but looks like it failed when I tried to grab second gear, as I said I still need more practice :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...