Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I live in brizzy, and will soon be working full time near chinchilla, about 5 hours drive away. My work is usually FIFO, but this site is DIDO.

I am going to have to buy a car anyway, as me and the Mrs share one at the moment, so I need to get something that is comfortable for frequent long journeys, but it also has to be fuel efficient. I'd get a falcodore, but they aren't that great efficiency wise..

Any ideas?

Adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/403864-good-long-distance-car/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

BA Falcon on LPG. On the highway a Falcadore is as efficient, if not more, than a smaller engined car, especially with cruise control.

Or even one on ULP. It's going to lumber along at 110kph using 7-8l/100ks.

Comfy, reliable, economical, cheap, roomy.

Edited by Cowboy1600

Falcons aren't *too* bad on fuel on the highway - I normally average high 7's - low 8's l/100km in the hire cars I drive.

One thing to be aware of is that a seat which might feel comfortable on a short drive can be cripplingly painful over long hauls.

Example - when I had an MY02 WRX, the seats were fantastic and supportive on the race track. however, after 2 hours behind the wheel, my backside was numb and I had to stop so that I could get circulation back in my legs. OTOH, the 2007 PAthfinder had horribly uncomfortable seats (like sitting on a park bench) but after 11 hours behind the wheel (Gold Coast to Mackay) I still felt quite refreshed and there was no discomfort in the seats.

I find the current crop of Falcadores to be very good long distance haulers. Much as I love my small cars, they have no place on country highways. A big car will soakk up the km's much more comfortably, and are likely a better proposition if you happen to encounter any wildlife. On that note, good headlights are a must, as I gather much of your driving will be at night. Big spotties are fine, but a decent set of factory headlights makes a big difference too (unless you want to go the B&S ute route and mount 16 spotties across your roll bar and bull bar.

I've got no problems with getting a como or falcon, what sort of distance, on average, can you get on a tank of lpg in a falcodore?

Are there any models that stand out? I think the new falcon g6e look really smart, but a bit out of my price range

Edited by adamskill

I'd go a BA or BF if the budget extends. XR6s can be had for only a small premium over the stocko. That said, the firmer suspension might not be what you're after in a mile eater. A G6E would be shit hot for 5 hour trips each way a couple times a week but they aren't cheap.

On the highway a ULP Falc will do ~7.5l/100k (let's say 8 to be safe). It has a 68L capacity so you're looking at 850ks+ out of a tank on the highway. Obviously adding some towns and the odd Maccas stop will knock some off this.

EDIT: Haven't found LPG economy figures yet.

EDIT2: 11-12 on highway for gas with 80L tank so ~650ks to a tank. This'll cost ~$60. ($0.70/litre)

7-8 on highway for ULP with 68L tank so ~850ks to a tank. This'll cost ~$95 ($1.40/litre)

LPG ~ $9.23/100ks

ULP ~ $11.17/100ks

Note ULP is likely to be a bit better around town.

Edited by Cowboy1600

I'd go a BA or BF if the budget extends. XR6s can be had for only a small premium over the stocko. That said, the firmer suspension might not be what you're after in a mile eater. A G6E would be shit hot for 5 hour trips each way a couple times a week but they aren't cheap.

On the highway a ULP Falc will do ~7.5l/100k (let's say 8 to be safe). It has a 68L capacity so you're looking at 850ks+ out of a tank on the highway. Obviously adding some towns and the odd Maccas stop will knock some off this.

EDIT: Haven't found LPG economy figures yet.

Cheers mate.

Magnas and camrays.... How would they stack up to the challenge?

The XR6 suspension is actually perfect for daily driving - specially on highways. I find the G6's are a bit floaty for my liking, and the seats feel like an arm chair, whereas the XR6 seats still give you some feeling of what's going on. For a 5 hour haul I'd go the XR6 over the G6 every time

I haven't driven an XR6 longer than about 4.5 hrs in one stretch (Sydney airport to Mudgee region), but they certainly do the job well. As an all rounder, I quite like them (prefer them over the SV6 Commodores, but that's just a personal preference). Second hand should be fairly cheap, given how many of them end up as hire cars.

Magnas are getting long in the tooth now, and haven't aged well. The Mitsu 380 was OK when new, but I haven't driven one for at least 5 years now. The Aurion is another good cruiser - I've done plenty of 3 hour highway trips in them. I wouldn't go for a camry. The 4 cyl engine in something that heavy will be frustrating, and probably no better on fuel than the 6 cyl.

I thought people would be recommending diesels like a golf? Should get very good economy and I believe they are reasonably comfortable guess it also depends how much you are hauling

Small shitboxes and the buy in to diesel takes many more years to pay off the LPG.

You want a big car for long distances.

Cheers mate.

Magnas and camrays.... How would they stack up to the challenge?

OK, but they don't have factory fitted LPG like the Falcon. The V6s aren't really much more economical, even ULP vs ULP.

It'd be a Falcon all the way for me, followed by a Commonwhore and then a Camry. As Warps said, Magnas are getting on now.

You should snap up my daily BA XR6 that I am selling :ph34r: lol in all seriousness though i agree with the above on the XR6 falcon and have taken mine on a few long stretch runs with no issues. Great car, pretty quiet and the seats are extremely comfortable. Fuel consumption on the highway is also suprisingly very good!

We have an E39 2003 Bimmer 530i

It's a glorious car and we'll keep it for a long time yet (as it's done only 73,000Km). Fuel consumpt'n about 8.7 on Hwy. Bimmers of the period have really good petrol frugality.

I didn't recommend it because you're driving for 5 hours and in case the water pump or side tank blows, you probably will be far away from a BMW spares outlet.

I would test drive one certainly if it has low Kms and has had its services all complete. It was rated a few years ago as being the best Euro car ever made.

A 540i was being sold here on SAU Cars F/S a li'l while ago. It may have sold now I think!

The E39 5 Series has all the adjustments of seat positioning you'd every want; and is more comfortable than my brother-in-law's G6E Turbo

If considering this, take the car to the local mechanic to download any fault codes on the DME

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have wasted too much time on this, more than I am willing to admit. I hope someone can set the record straight for me.  I want to replace my Nismo (non GT pro, non GT) standard 2 way in my R33 GTST with a 1.5 way... Ideally I want to get an ATS 1.5 way Carbon LSD, but I don't want to reuse my 29 spline 5x1 axle stubs, and new 30 spline 5x1's are impossible to get a hold of ($$$), and I don't want to drop the cash on going to 6x1 stubs and axles ATM. Which leads me to the Nismo GT Pro 38420-RSS15-B5 or RSS20, as they come with new axle stubs meant for the diff, and is "Convertible" from a 2 way or 1.5 way to "Other ways", but that is where I am stuck as the documentation is a bit all over the place.  To sum up what I have found I believe the all the Nismo GT Pro PN's are convertible from 2 way, 1.5 way, and 1 way; but Nismo sells 2 skus (2 & 1.5) so people do not have to disassemble to convert it.  I found this thread on 350z but it left the question unanswered. https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/620032-nismo-gt-pro-lsd-1-5-vs-2-way-and-torque.html  Essentially the way I think it all works out is like follows...  2 way  1 way  and 1.5 way would be the center pinion shaft in the 1 way block, but with the with the center flipped 180*. So the ramped side of the pinion would face the 1 way gate and act like a ramp.    I can only get my hands on the 2 way in the states, and I am not trying to get stuffed on tariffs by ordering from Japan or anywhere else. I want to confirm that if I get the 2 way I can convert it to the 1.5.     
    • Hi everyone, I have purchased my first GTR and I want to do a single turbo conversion to it. I've been doing as much research as i can and there are a few things that I can find and need to know. I need to run a coolant feed, coolant return, oil feed and oil return for my turbo setup. Here's what I know so far: On the hot side of the rb26 there is coolant feed, oil feed and oil return. Coolant return will be going around the front of the engine to where the thermostat is located. I will need to block off the rear oil return port. I will be running a turbosmart boost solenoid so any of the factory boost stuff wont be needed. Now onto what I don't know: 1. What do I do with the coolant / vacuum hardlines that run around the back of the motor?. 2. What do I block off or loop or move or remove?. I will be running the OEM intake manifold. 3. Is there anything in particular I need to buy for the cold side of the rb26?. I already have the intercooler and pipes sorted. If you have any pictures or information it would be appreciated. Thanks....  
    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
×
×
  • Create New...