Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats the most awful thing I have ever heard... in fact, I think my ears are bleeding!

Dont be dodgy! Buy a short shifter (slightly shorter length) or put up with it!

grrrrrrr :hellpisd:

Christian

BE WARNED!!!

To all dont try cutting down the std gearstick as its hollow and filled with rubber, you will end up with two pieces and not much else!Also i would not recommend using a short shifter as you will lunch the gearbox as i did in my 96 ser II.not being a harsh driver it came as a big surprise that my box was f----d and needed a complete rebuild.So please all be warned.

Regards,

SKYLINE.....(KYM)

To ALL,

the std gear stick is hollow and filled with a rubber type of material,hence it cannot be suscessfully cut down.Also note that using a short shifter in you box will increase your chances of lunching the syncros.Even tho i drive reasonbly hard im easy on my equipment and i thoroughly lunched the box so that it req'd a complete rebuild--- so be warned!!!

Regards,

SKYLINE...(Kym).

if you have a non GTR, upgrade to a GTR gearstick, its a tad shorter and the throw is lesser too.

Cutting a gear stick is not a big deal, don't overdo it though or you'll end up wrecking your gearbox. the shorter the distance between the tip and the fulcrum the more pressure it will exert on the gearbox when you change gears. Also since its not a short shift kit the throw will be the same, which means you'll have to move the knob slightly less than stock if you cut it.

A better idea would be to find a thread tapper of the same dimensions as the thread on your gear stick, and dirll a hole then add a thread to your gearknob (just make sure you don't com out the other side). effectively it'll shorten the height of your gearknob.

I have a mate who bought a Series II GTS and it has a cut down stick. He curses it everyday and is looking for a stock one to refit.

can i ask why?

I had a cut down gear stick which I replaced with the C's short shifter. The throw is about the say but the C's shaft is taller so it's not as "comfortable" to drive with...(yeah I'm lazy)...I reckon if I cut about 1.5-2 inches off the C's shaft it'd be close to the short throw on the MX-5.

Matts outta control.

I thought the throw on my Cs is alot shorter than the stocker. If you compare the two, the fulcrum point is moved, and the part of the stick above the pivot point is alot shorter than the stocker (about 1-2 inches from memory). This has the added advantage of meaning the throw is reduced further. It is a true quickshifter, not a shortened shifter.

Minimal movement of the hand equates to maximum result at the other end (fill your boots Matt)

BE WARNED!!!

   To all dont try cutting down the std gearstick as its hollow and filled with rubber, you will end up with two pieces and not much else!Also i would not recommend using a short shifter as you will lunch the gearbox as i did in my 96 ser II.not being a harsh driver it came as a big surprise that my box was f----d and needed a complete rebuild.So please all be warned.

         Regards,

                      SKYLINE.....(KYM)

I have a C's short shifter in my R33. I've been racing, dragging and general driving it for 2 years now and the gearbox is still fine....so don't blame the short shifter.

I'm with MarkG the throw is shorter but the lever itself is still too long

  • 2 weeks later...

Many Short Shifters work by increasing the pivot point of the shaft that goes into the gearbox locator. They lengthen the shaft that goes into the gearbox. This will increase the height of the actual gear stick because you need spacers to raise the whole gear shifter so that the end of the extended shaft can fit into the gearbox locator.

It is recommeneded that you run a high quality sythetic oil, such as REDLINE MTL so that all the components can be better lubricated for easier shifts. IF you cut the standard shaft, or not making a true short shifter, as the pivot point is exactly the same . Nothing is shorter as the arc length has not changed. The end result is a notchy shifter that will break your box because you will be banging it in gear all the time.

Your car, your property, but if you value you car and want to save money in the long run, put up with the longer shifter otherwise enjoy notchy shifts and gearbox rebuilds :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...