Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

my 25's real sick atm and i wanna get my spare bottom end built up real quick as i want a spare or to replace the motor in September as I've got a big event later in the year. I've never gone down the track of rebuilding a bottom end, i usually just swap my head over to another bottom end, I just need to clarify what parts to use, i have done a search but there are still allot of things missing / i want to make sure i purchase the right stuff. The car currently is 360hp safe tuned on 14psi and is used for circuit / durfting. I want to make a strong / reliable bottom end to finish off the build. Don't want to chase huge HP either.

The plan is.

25 block

later model gtr crank with longer oil drive, 33GTR?

forged rod / piston package from USA (87mm) rods usually come with fasteners.

With the pistons is it worth changing the comp ratio or just leave it?

What crank girdle do i need, im guessing the rb25 one will work?

What bearings, i gather you use rb26 bearings, not understanding the tolerances necessary what sizing to i buy or do i get the machine shop to tell me what i require?

Headgasket, im gonna take a guess and say 1.2mm would be suffice, or is this another thing i have to get my machine shop to tell me what to get due to resurfacing? I also assume you get one with a 87mm bore.

Oil pump, just gonna use a N1

ARP fasteners top/bottom.

Another thing when it comes to oil control. Cars used for circuit and durfting. The head has non-VCT cams so should i block the VCT oil feed? And a 1mm restrictor in the rear feed according to sydkids topics, aswell as blocking the front feed. The front head oil drain back to the sump is that for VCT? And can i block it off as i have a rear external drain?

Is there any machining you would recommend?

Thanks !!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406811-rb27-bottom-end-build/
Share on other sites

Well for a start it wont be a RB27... With 26 pistons/rods you get somewhere around the 2665cc if memory serves correct.

By your post and comments it certainly sounds like you need to get a machine/assembly shop involved. Make sure you use solid ARP rod bolts as well.

Also what is the budget here?

budget is around 2-3 for the bottom end, everything else i already have sorted out. i refuse to do a rb30. i just need more of a guideline to start with so i can order in some parts. don't want to miss my event.

You will need the matching girdle for the block you cant just use any old one as they are machined to size as a pair, as for bearings i would recommend ACL race series RB26 bearings, they come in two (2) sizes for standard journal size and that is 7M2428H & 7M2428HX, the HX's give you extra clearance than H's it all comes down to fitting them to your block and measuring the tunnel size then measure the crank and see what clearance you require.

Compression ratio between 8.5:1 to 9.0:1 will suffice.

As for camshafts if you want to run Non VCT then yes the VCT feed will need to be blocked off, to do so i normally tap the hole on the underside of the head and fit an A plug in it you also have to remove the brass segmented oil gallery plug at the front of the head and replace it with a normalplug like the rest of them and in the front intake cam journal the bigger hole also requires blocking. i would also leave the drain from the front exhaust side of the head to block in place as for restrictors you can fit some 1mm ones but if your retaining a hydraulic lifter setup i would not block one of them off as they require plenty of oil to keep them lifters filled up.

Also if not already done i would recommend drilling the 5 internal oil drains in the head and block to a bigger diameter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...