Jump to content
SAU Community

Sau Vic 2012 Motorsport Championship Round 7 - Hh 13Th Oct


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Been waiting all year for this :)

just got to get the civic ready

Reverse figure 8, is the track ran backwards? or you go straight instead of turning left and going down the dipper? have only ran it clockwise

Edited by xris

ok so im about to enter, only thing im confused about, i know asaa licence covers it, but, club member? as in wrx or skylines aus member? im asuming i need to pay the $95 as im a sau member? let me know about that and ill submit the forms, 2nd event! be interesting to see the differences over deca

Heads up to people thinking of heading out to hh (bryant park) next month wanting practice this month.

GCC has an event this sun (I'm thinking of entering depending upon weather) entries close tomorrow 5.30pm.

http://www.gippslandcarclub.com.au/suppregs.html

Only 2 problems

1. If they get 100 cars, you really don't get many runs at all (where WRX is 80)

2. It's CAMS and not AASA, so anyone without CAMS it's extra $$

not what i wanted to hear martin! :yucky:

They are still better than cold high performance road tyre like a AD08 - so it's not a major concern.

It's more the brakes and having no heat in them on the reverse Fig 8 given after you launch you can have some fair speed going and need to jump on the anchors. Lots of time to be gained there if you know your braking setup performance from cold.

Only 2 problems

1. If they get 100 cars, you really don't get many runs at all (where WRX is 80)

2. It's CAMS and not AASA, so anyone without CAMS it's extra $$

agreed but from what I ahve seen in the past they don;t get anywhere near that number.

meant to be a well run day as well.

we might be looking at doing some GCC rounds as part of our champ next year.

Heathcote timing never works, track condition depends on the moon.

Not worth driving up there for it. Better off going to Calder on a proper track with timing even though it costs more and you get less runs

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...