Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been looking into exhaust manifolds to hi-mount a hypergear or t67 kando seems 6boost are the best along with the other higher priced items

Has anyone used the cheaper manifolds please tell me about ur experiance. ( I've read the internets for days. some work some break)

Surly anything is better then the standard manifold.

I've seen these advertised, What are your opinions on the below

Just jap racing manifold

http://justjap.com/s...&cat=274&page=1

Slide industries manifold

http://www.ebay.com....=item3a74d06a31

Autobahn88 manifold

http://www.ebay.com....1&_qi=RTM839190

Hybrid performance

http://www.skylinesa...y-aug-specials/

the list goes on and on, If there is better ones please show me

What should I do, Would like not to spend $1000+ on a manifold. But if all the cheapies are truely crap. I will just use standard factory manifold.

If using the factory rb25det manifold is there any heat issues or any problems. When bolting on a larger turbine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409270-cheaper-turbo-manifolds-i-know-sigh/
Share on other sites

Pretty sure there is a thread in here on those NZ manifold etc.... May be of some use to you..... I went 6Boost as i wanted a reliable proven performer! Very happy with quality and excellent service!

Read hypergear thread from 296 and on wards:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page__st__5900

They've tested out the fully bored out and remade stock manifold against a $1300 steam pipe manifold plus manifold with external gate. Expansive manifold made a difference.

Would be interesting to see tests vs something like the NZ Hybrid Performance manifolds...

If I were going cheap, I'd probably go with Hybrid to be honest. Purely because of his thread on here, it's good to see a business willing to take criticism on board as well as posting developments. That said, when I get a high mount manifold, I won't be going cheap. The poor man pays twice.

Hey mate, you're probably going to hear this alot and you'll probably hate it but you're better off saving and getting yourself either a 6boost or equivilant manifold.

It's not so much about the power gains (if any, as some may argue) but whether the manifold will hold up and resist cracking/fracturing. The cost of buying a cheaper manifold and having it crack, and then the cost of labour to remove and either fix or purchase a new one, will outweigh the cost of getting a slightly more expensive one in the first place.

True that the cheaper one may be equal quality against a more expensive item, it's kind of a hit-and-miss sort of deal.

I run a 6Boost high-mount manifold and cannot fault it, so that's what I would reccommend :)

Would be interesting to see tests vs something like the NZ Hybrid Performance manifolds...

If I were going cheap, I'd probably go with Hybrid to be honest. Purely because of his thread on here, it's good to see a business willing to take criticism on board as well as posting developments. That said, when I get a high mount manifold, I won't be going cheap. The poor man pays twice.

Best advice :cheers:

They are all pretty much rubbish. They will crack and warp and you'll be paying to have it removed and fixed in less than a year.

Get a CRG, 6Boost or ETM manifold.

We use CRG for our manifolds and they are only $1100 or $1150 with EGT ports. Same quality as the 6boost manifolds and cnc machined collector as well.

Impressive to see the following and reputation a good manifold (or any product i guess) will get if its done right! Hanaldo nailed it with that quote too :)

Does CRG have a website?

No he used to but was getting smashed with work so he deals direct through us and a couple of other places mostly.

my google searches come up with nothing at all

CRG Manifolds - 0420 613 662

I would avoid calling him over the weekend as it's his birthday and he may or may not have groovy ladies all up in his biz right now. That is unconfirmed though.

Everyone is welcome to send him an sms wishing him happy birthday though. He will appreciate the thought

Check Brae auto fabrications manifolds. I'm using one and it performed well on couple of different turbochargers.

also check drifthovc (Abe2) he's got a steam pipe manifold made with merged collectors for $600.

Hypergear...

I saw you are a selling a hks cast manifold.

Any chance of fitting a kando t67 on it or your ATR43-g3?

I got a hks cast manifold off a mate but thinking of selling to run a brae manifold due to what I have heard about them.

Running rb25 in 180sx.

Yes the G3, SS1PU or SS2 sits on in the HKS manifold fine.Its pretty hard to install if you are trying to do it with engine in the chassis. Also very tight clearance between the turbo to engine mount and drain port.

The Brae manifold can be either high , low or side mount to stock position, I would prefer the side mount as they makes the power fine and nothing else needs to be changed.

Engine is out as I'm painting car ATM.

I have heard of some turbos on the hks manifold causing people to trim the engine mount.

If i was to run a G3 or similar turbo would the gains be worth the price of a brae manifold taking in mind I have the hks manifold and got it for virtually nothing or do you think sell and upgrade?

Cheers.

Yes if you run a 4inch intake you will need to trim the engine mount. But I can machine the comp housing down to 3inch instead of 4. How ever it is still recommended to trim the engine mount and run a 4inch induction pipe.

Since the engine is out, installation would be easy. I would just use the HKS manifold. I'm sure the end result would be similar or better to other aftermarket manifolds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...