Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You would find that the R32 also came stock rb25de. Therefore you will not need an engineers cirt.

LOL WUT read what you just wrote

Hmmm, you should watch what you are talking about. As for his suggestion of putting a proper non turbo motor in there is the smartest decision you will ever make.

As for why your car is running shit? Its because the turbo is missing doofus. And want to know another thing? Your non turbo'd car is still illegal for you to drive on your p's because it was registered as a turbo.

So instead of spitting in people's faces like a spoilt brat, just take what he says and reply in a manner as follows, no thank you, I would rather try something else

so he insults me, but i cant insult back?

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes i did re read that? Not sure what your implying,

You mention you dont want to go Rb25de becuase you will have to pay thousands for a cirtificate,

I said, They came stock with the Rb25de in some year makes, Therefore there is nothing to engineer.

Mate, Were trying to help here... Chill out. its friday god dammit

Edited by sydking

Yes i did re read that? Not sure what your implying,

You mention you dont want to go Rb25de becuase you will have to pay thousands for a cirtificate,

I said, They came stock with the Rb25de in some year makes, Therefore there is nothing to engineer.

Mate, Were trying to help here... Chill out. its friday god dammit

which r32 skyline came with stock rb25de please tell me right now

which r32 skyline came with stock rb25de please tell me right now

The 2.5 L RB25 engine was produced in four forms:

  • RB25DE - NON-TURBO twin-cam 140 kW/190 PS (180 - 200 hp ) @ 6000 rpm, 255 N·m (26.0 kgf·m) @ 4000 rpm)
  • RB25DET - twin-cam TURBO (T3 Turbo) (245 to 250 hp and 319 N·m)
  • NEO RB25DE- NON-TURBO twin-cam 147 kW/200 PS @ 6000 rpm, 255 N·m (26.0 kgf·m) @ 4000 rpm)
  • NEO RB25DET - twin-cam TURBO (206 kW (280 PS) @ 6400 rpm, 362 N·m (37.0 kgf·m) @ 3200 rpm)

RB25DE and DET engines produced from August 1993 also featured NVCS (Nissan Variable Cam System) for the intake cam. This gave the new RB25DE more power and torque at lower rpm than the previous model. From 1995,(Series 2 Engines) both the RB25DE and RB25DET had a revised electrical system and the turbo charger on the RB25DET(s2) had a plastic compressor wheel rather than aluminium. The most obvious change to the system was the introduction of ignition coils with built in ignitors, therefore the coil ignitor that was on previous models was not used. Other changes were, different air flow meter, engine ecu, cam angle sensor and throttle position sensor. Mechanically series 1 and series 2 very similar, the only mechanical difference would be the Camshafts as the series 2 Cam Angle Sensor's shaft that goes into the Exhaust cam is slightly different. This is very important to not mistake!

In May 1998 a NEO head was fitted, which enabled the engine to be classified as a low emission vehicle (LEV) engine due to their lower fuel consumption and emission output. The NEO head featured solid lifters rather than hydraulic, revised camshafts, with on/off solenoid Variable VCT , used a hotter 82°c thermostat, model specific coil packs and a revised inlet manifold (the runner diameter is reduced from 50mm to 45mm to increase air velocity and low end torque) in particular the RB25DE NEO which had 2 inlets going into the inlet manifold. The combustion chamber of the head is smaller so GT-R spec connecting rods are used to compensate as well as model specific pistons. The turbo received the larger OP6 turbine which some came with steel compressor and turbine wheels, where others had the Nylon plastic compressor wheel and ceramic turbine wheel. Some also used an N1 type oil pump and had the oil pump drive collar on the crank revised to help cope with the breakage problems associated with fast, high revs. All in all they are quite a different engine in their own right - a culmination of 20 years of Nissan RB engine building rolled into one.

The non-VCT, non-turbo RB25DE was fitted to the R32 Skyline, the VCT turbo and non-turbo was fitted to R33 Skylines and the WC34 Stagea. Early R34 Skylines use the non NEO RB, later models use the NEO version.

R32 Skyline RB25DE Camshaft duration 240°in, 232°ex lift: 7.8mm in, 7.3mm ex

R33 Skyline RB25DE Camshaft duration 240°in, 240°ex lift: 7.8mm in, 7.8mm ex

RB25DET Camshaft duration 240°in, 240°ex lift: 7.8mm in, 7.8mm ex

RB25DE NEO Camshaft duration 236°in, 232°ex lift: 8.4mm in, 6.9mm ex

RB25DET NEO Camshaft duration 236°in, 232°ex lift: 8.4mm in, 8.7mm ex

Edited by sydking

Should have just bought an S-Chassis for cheap, plenty of manuals going around. Instead you went the route that 99% of

the people in this forum will be against. This will have been a hit in the wasteland.

SyDKing:

Your not telling me which exact model the rb25de came with in a r32. If i recall correctly, they were first used in the series 1 r33 skylines in 93. I dont think nissan ever put a rb25de into a r32 from factory.

So, are you trying to say i can swap motors between cars that use the same chassis?

Edited by IM-32-FK

It came in some later R32 GTS models. As he said in his post.

You should research this stuff man, otherwise it'll cost you money and time, also make you look stupider than you actually are

Everyone here is giving great advice, grab an RB25DE about 1k?? Would just need it put in and that's all.

One thing you'll probably get pulled up on is having a turbo badged and registered car, cops will love you for that even though it doesn't have a turbo.

tl;dr: Yes you can put in rb25de and goodluck

r32's came with the motors rb20det, rb26dett, rb20de and the rb25de. rb25de's are cheaps as chips, picked up a replacement motor for my blown r33 rb25de for $400, worked perfect ever since, guy even claimed it only had 67000 on it but i dont live in lala land and know that isnt true.

so if your smart and car work on cars yourself you can have a mad running r32 non tubro for around $500, which is wayyy cheaper than trying to fix up your unturboed rb25det-t.

SyDKing:

Your not telling me which exact model the rb25de came with in a r32. If i recall correctly, they were first used in the series 1 r33 skylines in 93. I dont think nissan ever put a rb25de into a r32 from factory.

So, are you trying to say i can swap motors between cars that use the same chassis?

Wowwww I thought you were trolling. Don't know how many more people you need to tell you that R32's DID come in RB25DE, but heres another one!

Seriously though RB25DE in the little 32 would go well!

Edit: Also I don't think you ever register your car as a Turbo... It definitely doesn't come up with Turbo or N/A in police computers when they rego check it. Unless the copper can read long engine numbers that pray-tell to the aspiration.

Which they won't look at unless they've popped your bonnet, in which case they'll definitely be getting you with your current modified manifolds etc.

and this is why i love the NA section.

the easiest and cheapest option is to simple buy a rb20DE to put in it. the best option is to put the rb25DE into it, and the worst, and most likely the most expensive option is to try and get your current engine to run properly.

actually the best option would be to sell it and buy something else. a SSS pulsar would be a better option. will be faster and cheaper on fuel, rego, insurance, etc. or even just a commodore or falcon, both of which will be faster, cheaper, etc.

I was under the impression that the only time you need an engineering cert is when you upgrade the motor and the difference between the fuel displacement (between the original and the new engine) is greater than 0.2L

but thank you all for the insight.

gearbox is gonna need changing too, so thats another $500 i guess...plus labour costs probably $600-$800...

it all adds up, i dont have that type of money now anyway it needs to get painted.

the gts25 r32 came with 25de, the rb20 with the turbo removed should've run not too bad, slow, but not running too terribly enough to bother someone that would do a -T, have you done the usual checks? put a turbo back on? even a stock 20 turbo

(i think zebra is asking why you think you need to change the gearbox?)

Edited by WMDC35

the gts25 r32 came with 25de, the rb20 with the turbo removed should've run not too bad, slow, but not running too terribly enough to bother someone that would do a -T, have you done the usual checks? put a turbo back on? even a stock 20 turbo

(i think zebra is asking why you think you need to change the gearbox?)

i dont know, you tell me. Can i use a rb20det gearbox with a rb25 engine?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...