Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now guys I have 2 queries about ex gate on exhaust manifold..

First one is, I've been seeing and told that ezine gate is highly recommended to be welded onto rear housing of turbo and or right near the t3 flange..!!!

Second is obviously a 6boost manifold as the gate is already on the mani...

Does or anyone know if they both sound the same and if one is correct or wrong idea...

Thanks...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/411208-ex-gaterb25det/
Share on other sites

I dont like the look of it, and if you want to change turbos or housings later it sucks.

But I do like the boost curve from a housing/gate combo. You can nearly always put a ruler on it and it will be pretty close!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/411208-ex-gaterb25det/#findComment-6573961
Share on other sites

I had a td05 with gate welded on rear and never had any troubles,that said I'm now running a td06 on a modded stock mani with gate and no dramas there either..choice is yours and yes I've heard good and bad stories aswell but that didn't stop me doing it Just make sure it's a good job and don't skimp.If you have the cash a 6boost mani will yield more power top end tho.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/411208-ex-gaterb25det/#findComment-6576737
Share on other sites

Yehhh that's the hole reason for me to do this on the rear housing...

As I can't affords a 6boost mani cause I have other shit to buy first...

This option still allows me to run stock mani and all the same pipe work....

Thanks for the imput...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/411208-ex-gaterb25det/#findComment-6576986
Share on other sites

I went for on the exhaust housing - yes if I wanted to change housing more of a pain but if a stud breaks or the manifold has to come off that can be a pain too so both have advantages and disadvantages.

interms of sound, no difference as others have said.

these should help give you an idea of how to mount off the housing correctly.

http://www.turbosmar...tegate-fitting/

http://www.turbosmar...wastegate-work/

article_wgate1.png

article_wgate3.png

Adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/411208-ex-gaterb25det/#findComment-6577039
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...