Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wish I recognized the car and came said hello at the SAU Nats. Loving the results coming out of this community lately it's insane.

Makes me want to push 11ty boost into my little turbo till it runs out of puff

This is true, alot of big horse power cars kicking around now, especially in sydney...

hey Joey, what cat you running? may have missed it...

4" exhaust?

Hi Dan, exhuast is tapered out from the back of the turbo to a 4 inch all the way to the cat and including the cat. The rest is 3.5inch

The cat is a "high flow" cat :)

Good to hear Nick,

just remember that the turbo is going to sit very high.. especially on a 30 block

I have a bit of room to spare even with the extra deck height. Out of interest have you guys seen any precision results bettering the usual garrett options or is it still just hype? I keep looking for reasons to change but there are precious few results.

Interesting to see how this goes.

More specific details of the setup?

The details are in the build thread but it's basically a std stroke built 30, 26 head with big'ish cams, full race 'power' manifold and all the supporting stuff.

Out of interest have you guys seen any precision results bettering the usual garrett options or is it still just hype? I keep looking for reasons to change but there are precious few results.

From what I have seen they usually come up with a bit better results that the Garrett equivalent. Nothing earth shattering but a little. I think the big test for me will be my GTR on a dyno that has a lot of other results on file to compare with :)

Edited by SimonR32

Well after seeing the power it made on pump on low boost (around 375rwkw) i would have thought it would have made more power...

but by the time we played with the cam gears and got boost coming on nice and early we lost that little bit up top

at the end of the day the front fan is only 60mm and for it to make that power with that kind of response, i couldnt have asked for much more really :)

Absolutely, hardly a disappointing number considering the spool and the price of the turbo - just advertising would suggest that it will match or beat the performance of a GT3582R but it looks a bit more like it is more or less comparable with but definitely not likely to outperform. Again, no shame in that for something not much over half the price that looks and sounds awesome :D

  • Like 1

From what I have seen they usually come up with a bit better results that the Garrett equivalent. Nothing earth shattering but a little. I think the big test for me will be my GTR on a dyno that has a lot of other results on file to compare with :)

That will be interesting, is that likely to happen? An outfit I know is doing a Precision PT6766 and a Forced Performance GT3794R HTA on the otherwise equivalent setup car - an 4G63 unfortunately, but should give a general idea. Will be interesting to see if the Precision turbos are matching the performance of the HTAs.

That will be interesting, is that likely to happen? An outfit I know is doing a Precision PT6766 and a Forced Performance GT3794R HTA on the otherwise equivalent setup car - an 4G63 unfortunately, but should give a general idea. Will be interesting to see if the Precision turbos are matching the performance of the HTAs.

I don't think they have done any HTA's but millions of GT3582R, GTX3582R and T04Z's etc

Here's a video of Joey's car at the Dyno Day yesterday. I think he mentioned it was running about E60.

Sound isn't great but at least it doesn't blow out too bad. Best to click HD and watch it that way (I uploaded a full 1080HD version but even Vimeo trims it down to 720).

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...