Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

THE RESULTS ARE IN!!!!!!

After driving my car around with 260rwkws (stock ecu/turbos) for three months, the hunger for more power was unbareable, so I went on the costly journey a lot of GTR owners decide to take....

My car has finally undergone the turbo upgrade, and after much deliberation decided to go for the Trust T517Z turbo kit. These turbos were chosen as everyone opts for the HKS 2530s, so I decided to be different and more importantly wanted to see the difference between the two, mainly POWER, RESPONSE, LAG...

These are the performance modifications undergone with the upgrade:

- Power FC

- Nismo AFM x2

- Trust Fuel Rail

- Trust 720cc Injectors

- SARD Fuel Pressure Regulator

- Trust T517Z 8cm2 turbos x2

- Bosch 044 Fuel Pump

- HKS EVC4 Boost Controller

- Custom Catch Can

- Daiken Exedy Twin Plate Clutch (converted to push type)

On the dyno the car pumped out 324 rwkws at 20psi (1.3bar). I was very happy with the result, but noticed that car was much laggier which was expected.... However when full boost hits (around 4800rpm), u can't help but smile!!!!!

In the next couple of weeks, there will be a comparison between my car and Simon's car (meshmesh) who has the exact modifications except HKS 2530 turbo kit.... The comparison will be done on the same dyno, same day....

Anyway heres the dyno sheet:

(NOTE: This was NOT done in 'SHOOTOUT MODE')

http://www.meggala.com/T517Za.gif

P.S Big thanx to Gerald and Nigel at Ice Performance!!!!!

And BIG THANX to Steve aka meggala!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41542-dyno-result-t517zs-on-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

intresting dude, thanx for posting, maybe try cam gears as well those turbos are supposed to have bugger all lag compared to the 2530's, good luck.

THE RESULTS ARE IN!!!!!!

After driving my car around with 260rwkws (stock ecu/turbos) for three months, the hunger for more power was unbareable, so I went on the costly journey a lot of GTR owners decide to take....

My car has finally undergone the turbo upgrade, and after much deliberation decided to go for the Trust T517Z turbo kit. These turbos were chosen as everyone opts for the HKS 2530s, so I decided to be different and more importantly wanted to see the difference between the two, mainly POWER, RESPONSE, LAG...

These are the performance modifications undergone with the upgrade:

- Power FC

- Nismo AFM x2

- Trust Fuel Rail

- Trust 720cc Injectors

- SARD Fuel Pressure Regulator

- Trust T517Z 10cm2 turbos x2

- Bosch 044 Fuel Pump

- HKS EVC4 Boost Controller

- Custom Catch Can

- Daiken Exedy Twin Plate Clutch (converted to push type)

On the dyno the car pumped out 324 rwkws at 20psi (1.3bar). I was very happy with the result, but noticed that car was much laggier which was expected.... However when full boost hits (around 4800rpm), u can't help but smile!!!!!

In the next couple of weeks, there will be a comparison between my car and Simon's car (meshmesh) who has the exact modifications except HKS 2530 turbo kit.... The comparison will be done on the same dyno, same day....

Anyway heres the dyno sheet:

(NOTE: This was NOT done in 'SHOOTOUT MODE')

http://www.meggala.com/T517Za.gif

P.S Big thanx to Gerald and Nigel at Ice Performance!!!!!

And BIG THANX to Steve aka meggala!!!!!

Hey Jack... either way you gotta be happy :rofl:. The boys were always pretty confident about your car making the power..no probs. I think it was only a concern about lag?? But by what you say @4800~rpm, that sounds about the same as mine. I tried to do an overlay of your dyno that you emailed me against mine, but the Kmh per hours are set differently, and I think you'll find that yours is not that laggy after all, in comparison my 2530's set up.

Hopefully my friggin clutch arrives next week. :rofl: once it does, we'll organise a day with the boys on the dyno.

Tribex.. I think Jack does have cam gear?? he can confirm, also jack did you end up putting some lightened pulleys? If so do you notice any difference?

Well done.

I'm curious, what did you make at 1 bar? what are these turbos equivilant too? are you running stock internals?

for cost of the PFC and Nismo AFM's I mite recommend the Wolf3d V4 which will also give you boost control and allow you to run a MAP table. Overall a very nice result can you do a run in shootout mode so I can compare my figures to yours?

my chart can be found here http://summoner.perthstreetcars.net/Cefiro...o/mark_dyno.JPG and this was done in shootout at 1 bar.

tribex- yes your right, they are meant to be less laggier than 2530s, but in the 8cm2 version, mine are the 10cm2 version so maybe that's why they are laggier?? Dunno...

Yes I have Trust cam gears....

Doughboy- standard cams, standard headgasket...

meshmesh- yeah full boost is around 5000rpm, getting used to the lag now!!!! As far as the Trust pulley kit, not sure if it made a difference....

rev210- yeah saw that thread, these turbos are apparently capable of 2 bar, don't know about reliability.... my car gets driven on weekends only, so doesn't clock up the k's....

summoner- I'm not sure what the car makes at 1bar, pretty useless running at 1 bar might aswell stay with stock turbos...

These turbos are equivalent to HKS 2530s rated at 600hp for both of them...

Yes running stock internals....

Didn't want to use anything but Power FC, personal preference....

Will do a readout in shootout mode in a couple of weeks when we do the comparison between my car and Simon's (meshmesh)... STAY TUNED!!!! By the way what turbos you running???

Don't think itas tailing off that much, feels very strong.... will have to check it out next time...

for cost of the PFC and Nismo AFM's I mite recommend the Wolf3d V4 which will also give you boost control and allow you to run a MAP table.

Summoner - you should know the rules by now! It's not permitted to use Wolf on GTRs in the Eastern States! :jk:

hope you got $'s for a spare engine then cause you'll need it.

We limited mine to 1bar boost and its running stupidly rich(fouls up plugs) so going to have to drop it down to maybe 12psi and cleantune up. Over 450rwhp and imho you are risking the engine.

My turbo's are equivilant to around hi flo 2540's... Efficiency is the key

I may not know the intricacies of tuning, but wtf has boost got to do with running rich/lean? Sounds more like your tuner hasn't got his fuel mapping correct than whether you're running too much boost...

I'm running 2530s at 19psi and my AFR is sitting dead on 12.0, I don't know why you'd want to run these turbos at a lower boost pressure than that.

Great figures without cams - I did a fair bit of reading on these Trust turbos and found alot of overseas people (UK) had major problems with longevity.

Trust may well have fixed this problem but if they havent I understand the following is the go:

1. upgraded thrust bearing

2. Oil cooler to reduce temps as they are oil cooled

3. hope for the best

Not wanting to appear pessemistic just what I have herd.

Jeremy

summoner & jezzzr, that's the first time I've heard such claims about the trust kits. At the same time, I'm taking it with a grain of salt, mainly because one of AU's most respected gtr builders Ben from racepace recommended these and infact built Ph1's GTR also with the Trust turbo's. Ph1 is pushing around 350rwk with these turbo's, and I am yet to hear he has any problems, perhaps he can confirm. Finally, don't get me wrong, but the pommies aren't exactly as upto date with GTR as AU are they??, and their not the most talented when it comes to engineering, tuning either...

I hope I am wrong (or rather what I read was wrong) because I will be getting a pair of these turbos if they are as durable as HKS/Garett etc, they clearly make great power. The thread that put me off is:

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/showthre...ead.php?t=21242

Its worth a read - UK may be behind us but theyve been using these trust turbos for a while.

Jeremy

Congrats on the results!! sounds like a very nice package :(

As for the turbo's longevity, i've never heard of anyone out here having trouble with them at all. Pete at advan backs them to the hilt, reckons they're the best bolt on low mounts along with 2530's.

It's funny there not having that problem in japan. Maybe they don't like english weather haha :headspin:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...