Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

As part of my current build I will be running a Tomei oil pump, ACL bearings (with an extra thou clearance) and sump extension (8L capacity). Unsure of oil weight as yet...

I am interested to know what oil pressure you're reading at say idle, 3k, 6k and 7.5k RPM?

Also, those doing track work what level of pressure drops are you getting?

I am trying to figure out which EPC valve to run with the Accusump....I found this doc from Canton, see link below:

http://cdn.racerpart...ads/EPC FAQ.pdf

But just want to confirm the 35-40 psi valve is going to be the correct one??

Really unsure at which level of oil pressure (psi) I want the Accusump to open...35-40 psi Or 55-60 psi??

Cheers

Edited by $$slowmedown

From what a few people and I worked out, you won't need the EPC valve.

What you'll want;

Accusump with the electric solenoid valve which is switched on with the ignition on (with an override off switch as well).

Some type of ball valve between the solenoid valve and the engine - to regulate flow

Basically the accusump is open to the engine full time, it discharges and charges as needed, the ball valve is to regulate how much oil is fed to and from the accusump. People found the accusump with no ball valve was dumping way too much oil too quickly when a drop in pressure was found and when the accusump was re-filling, the pump was struggling to feed to accusump and the enigne.

This was worked out using oil pressure vs RPM data logging. I'll be doing the same once i'm ready.

Before the accusump the amount of surge the engine saw was stupid (factory sump, was overfilled slightly i believe) and surged quite badly around some corners. Once the accusump was set up like above there have been no surge issues that i'm aware of.

The car i'm referring to is Simon's S14.

is there any problem dumping cold oil from the accusump into the motor when it opens? the oil in the accusump will be a lot cooler if there is no pressure drop yeah

Before first start up the oil is dumped from the accusump into the cold engine for pre start lubrication. This is normal.

When the engine is running the accusump is charging and discharging as oil pressure rises and falls. Oil doesnt just sit in the accusump doing nothing. So the oil doesnt get a chance to sit in the accusump long enough to cool down.

Yeah thats it. Anyone of those accusumps, the electric solenoid valve and that ball valve will do to reduce flow.

This is mine installed in the boot of my R31 under the parcel shelf.

P6110312.jpg

Did you guys tee the feed into your oil cooler lines with a one way valve? Or connect the accumulator directly to an oil gallery?

Thanks.

I'll be doing this yes. Earls one way -10 check valve. The one way valve that Canton sells restricts too much flow.

But post oil cooler, just before the inlet into the engine.

  • 6 months later...

theres no need to worry about cold oil dumping into engine.. i can assure you that during engine operation that hot oil makes its way back to the accumulator.

mine has been running mint. used just the manual ball valve mounted it behind drivers seat with braided line running through the cabin, however on the new shell i now have mounted in engine bay and using an elec solenoid.

Just a side question, sorry to move off topic.

Running an external oil pump with a long line between pump and feed to engine. Always get a lot of rattle on startup so I crank the engine over without ignition first to build pressure.

Not worried about anti surge but very keen to use the accusump as pre start lube.

How would you use one of these with an external pump picking up oil from external sump pickup and fed direct into oil pump housing?

Cheers.

That is exactly what I'm looking for. My engine never rattles once I crank it over for a little bit, even if I just see 10psi before starting.

@DCIEVE - Not sure what you mean, I don't run a sandwich plate between the block and the filter. No oil cooler. As for the 1 way valve, little worried it will restrict flow. If I tee it into main gallery with the electric valve, will this not work as well? (think I'm missing something) Cheers.

FJenginebuild004.jpg

Edited by Gareth87

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...